Literature DB >> 12828140

Use of maternity waiting home in rural Zambia.

Luc van Lonkhuijzen1, Margreet Stegeman, Rebecca Nyirongo, Jos van Roosmalen.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to assess the results from the use of a maternity waiting home, a health facility to which women with high risk pregnancies are referred during the last weeks of pregnancy in rural Zambia. It compared the risk status and pregnancy outcome in women staying as waiters with those women who give birth in hospital after direct admission (non-waiters). Forty seven per-cent of the non-waiters (n = 292) had no maternal risk factors and 85% had no antenatal risk factors as compared to 17% and 78% among the waiters (n = 218). Eighty six per cent of waiters had spontaneous vaginal vertex delivery as compared to 95% of non-waiters. Although the differences in risk status were statistically significant, no differences were found in birth weight and maternal and perinatal mortality. The similar obstetric outcome among waiters with more high risk pregnancies and non-waiters could be interpreted as a possible outcome of the maternity waiting home. When dependent on a proper functioning referral system, such waiting homes can reduce perinatal mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12828140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr J Reprod Health        ISSN: 1118-4841


  27 in total

1.  Reaching vulnerable women through maternity waiting homes in Malawi.

Authors:  Kavita Singh; Ilene Speizer; Eunsoo Timothy Kim; Clara Lemani; Ann Phoya
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  The tyranny of distance: maternity waiting homes and access to birthing facilities in rural Timor-Leste.

Authors:  Kayli Wild; Lesley Barclay; Paul Kelly; Nelson Martins
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 3.  Newborn Outcomes and Maternity Waiting Homes in Low and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Julie M Buser; Jody R Lori
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-04

Review 4.  Maternity waiting facilities for improving maternal and neonatal outcome in low-resource countries.

Authors:  Luc van Lonkhuijzen; Jelle Stekelenburg; Jos van Roosmalen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

Review 5.  Delivering interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths: improving service supply and community demand.

Authors:  Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Gary L Darmstadt; Rachel A Haws; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Linking families and facilities for care at birth: what works to avert intrapartum-related deaths?

Authors:  Anne C C Lee; Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens; Vishwajeet Kumar; David Osrin; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Steven N Wall; Allyala K Nandakumar; Uzma Syed; Gary L Darmstadt
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Using audit to enhance quality of maternity care in resource limited countries: lessons learnt from rural Tanzania.

Authors:  Angelo S Nyamtema; Alise Bartsch de Jong; David P Urassa; Jos van Roosmalen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  The effectiveness of emergency obstetric referral interventions in developing country settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julia Hussein; Lovney Kanguru; Margaret Astin; Stephen Munjanja
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Reducing one million child deaths from birth asphyxia--a survey of health systems gaps and priorities.

Authors:  Joy E Lawn; Ananta Manandhar; Rachel A Haws; Gary L Darmstadt
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2007-05-16

10.  Acceptability of evidence-based neonatal care practices in rural Uganda - implications for programming.

Authors:  Peter Waiswa; Margaret Kemigisa; Juliet Kiguli; Sarah Naikoba; George W Pariyo; Stefan Peterson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.