P Millard1, J Bailey, J Hanson. 1. Dept. of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7240.
Abstract
DESIGN: Comparative study of pregnancy outcome for parturients who had stayed in an antenatal village and for those admitted directly from the community. SETTING: A rural hospital in Zimbabwe. OUTCOME MEASURES: Birthweight, perinatal mortality and degree of obstetrical intervention. RESULTS: Women who stayed in the antenatal village experienced better pregnancy outcome than women admitted directly from the community. Birthweight was greater, perinatal mortality lower, and obstetrical intervention less often required in the antenatal village group. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of randomisation, differences between the two groups in antenatal risk factors, and lack of information relating to socio-economic status suggest that generalisations beyond the specific case be made cautiously.
DESIGN: Comparative study of pregnancy outcome for parturients who had stayed in an antenatal village and for those admitted directly from the community. SETTING: A rural hospital in Zimbabwe. OUTCOME MEASURES: Birthweight, perinatal mortality and degree of obstetrical intervention. RESULTS:Women who stayed in the antenatal village experienced better pregnancy outcome than women admitted directly from the community. Birthweight was greater, perinatal mortality lower, and obstetrical intervention less often required in the antenatal village group. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of randomisation, differences between the two groups in antenatal risk factors, and lack of information relating to socio-economic status suggest that generalisations beyond the specific case be made cautiously.
Authors: Anne C C Lee; Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens; Vishwajeet Kumar; David Osrin; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Steven N Wall; Allyala K Nandakumar; Uzma Syed; Gary L Darmstadt Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Cephas Sialubanje; Karlijn Massar; Marit S G van der Pijl; Elisa Maria Kirch; Davidson H Hamer; Robert A C Ruiter Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 3.223