Literature DB >> 28098553

Biofilm-Forming Capability of Highly Virulent, Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris.

Leighann Sherry, Gordon Ramage, Ryan Kean, Andrew Borman, Elizabeth M Johnson, Malcolm D Richardson, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson.   

Abstract

The emerging multidrug-resistant yeast pathogen Candida auris has attracted considerable attention as a source of healthcare-associated infections. We report that this highly virulent yeast has the capacity to form antifungal resistant biofilms sensitive to the disinfectant chlorhexidine in vitro.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candida auris; aggregative phenotypes; antifungal drug­ resistant; biofilm; candidemia; chlorhexidine; fungi; healthcare–associated infections; killing assay; multidrug resistant; nonaggregative phenotypes; virulent; yeast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28098553      PMCID: PMC5324806          DOI: 10.3201/eid2302.161320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


The yeast pathogen Candida auris was first detected in 2009 from an ear canal infection in Japan (). This species initially attracted attention because of its reduced susceptibility to azoles and amphotericin B, combined with the lack of reliable culture-based methods for its identification (). More recently, C. auris has been associated globally with life-threatening invasive diseases, such as bloodstream and wound infections. C. auris has also caused hospital outbreaks across Asia and South America, as highlighted in a 2016 clinical alert (). In addition, in a UK intensive care unit, candidemia developed in 20% of patients colonized with C. auris (). Although the mode of transmission within hospitals is unknown, C. auris may substantially contaminate rooms of colonized or infected patients (). Phospholipase and proteinase activity have been identified as virulence factors (); however, because previously used assessment techniques were rudimentary, this pathogen’s ability to form biofilm remains under question (). The draft genome identifying various proteins involved in biofilm formation (), coupled with recent descriptions of aggregative and nonaggregative phenotypes, the latter of which are more virulent in vivo (), indicate the possibility of heterogeneous C. auris biofilm formation, as described for C. albicans (). We sought to examine these aggregative and nonaggregative C. auris phenotypes in the context of biofilm-forming capacity, investigate their susceptibility to a panel of antifungal agents and the skin disinfectant chlorhexidine, and investigate their virulence in vivo.

The Study

Throughout this study, we used C. albicans SC5314 and Candida glabrata WT2001 as comparators for C. auris nonaggregative strains NCPF 8971 (strain 10) and NCPF 8973 (strain 12) and aggregative strains NCPF 8977 (strain 2) and NCPF 8978 (strain 6), as previously described (). Strains were propagated in YPD broth (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK), incubated overnight at 30°C, and adjusted to 106 cells/mL in RPMI 1640 medium (). On 3 separate occasions, 8 biofilms of each Candida species were grown in flat-bottomed, 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates and incubated for 24 h at 37°C, after which biomass was assessed by crystal violet assay (). C. albicans displayed the greatest biofilm mass (Figure 1, panel A), consistent with previous findings (). Compared with C. albicans, all C. auris strains formed significantly reduced biofilms (p<0.0001): biomass for nonaggregative C. auris strains 10 and 12 was 2.4 and 1.5 times less, respectively, than those for C. albicans, and biomass for aggregative C. auris strains 2 and 6 was 3.0 and 3.1 times less, respectively. However, these strains formed significantly greater biofilms (p<0.0001) than those formed by C. glabrata (3.8, 6.0, 3.0, and 2.9 times more for strains 10, 12, 2, and 6, respectively). We confirmed these findings for each species by scanning electron microscopy after growing the strains on Thermanox Coverslips (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Paisley, UK) for 24 h, as previously described (). C. albicans biofilms were typically densely packed with hyphae (Figure 1, panel B), whereas C. glabrata formed a sparse biofilm consisting of yeast cells only, without extracellular matrix (Figure 1, panel C). C. auris strain 10 biofilm formation was intermediate to the C. albicans and C. glabrata phenotypes, showing predominately budding yeast and occasional pseudohyphae (Figure 1, panel D). In agreement with previous findings (), all tested C. auris strains displayed the same phenotype.
Figure 1

Biofilm formation on Candida auris, C. albicans, and C. glabrata yeast strains. A) Biomass quantities were determined spectrophotometrically for 4 strains of C. auris and 1 each of C. albicans and C. glabrata. Isolates were standardized to 106 cells/mL in RPMI-1640 and grown in flat-bottomed 96-well microtiter plates for 24 h at 37°C. Biofilms were then washed, stained with crystal violet solution, and quantified. Data represent the mean ± SD of experiments performed on 3 separate occasions, using 8 replicates for each strain. Results show that C. auris can form heterogeneous intermediate biofilms. B–D) C. albicans (B), C. glabrata (C) and C. auris (D) were also grown on Thermanox coverslips (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Paisley, UK) for 24 h at 37°C. Biofilms were then processed and viewed on a JEOL (Tokyo, Japan) JSM-6400 scanning electron microscope; images were assembled using Photoshop software (http://www.photoshop.com/products). Arrow indicates pseudohyphae in C. auris biofilm (D). Scale bars represent 20 μm (original magnification ×1,000). OD, optical density.

Biofilm formation on Candida auris, C. albicans, and C. glabrata yeast strains. A) Biomass quantities were determined spectrophotometrically for 4 strains of C. auris and 1 each of C. albicans and C. glabrata. Isolates were standardized to 106 cells/mL in RPMI-1640 and grown in flat-bottomed 96-well microtiter plates for 24 h at 37°C. Biofilms were then washed, stained with crystal violet solution, and quantified. Data represent the mean ± SD of experiments performed on 3 separate occasions, using 8 replicates for each strain. Results show that C. auris can form heterogeneous intermediate biofilms. B–D) C. albicans (B), C. glabrata (C) and C. auris (D) were also grown on Thermanox coverslips (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Paisley, UK) for 24 h at 37°C. Biofilms were then processed and viewed on a JEOL (Tokyo, Japan) JSM-6400 scanning electron microscope; images were assembled using Photoshop software (http://www.photoshop.com/products). Arrow indicates pseudohyphae in C. auris biofilm (D). Scale bars represent 20 μm (original magnification ×1,000). OD, optical density. To determine MICs for planktonic and sessile cells of the C. auris strains, we performed antifungal susceptibility testing using standardized Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A3 broth microdilution (visual inspection) and standardized candidal biofilm testing (metabolic viability) with fluconazole, voriconazole, caspofungin, micafungin, liposomal amphotericin B, amphotericin B, and chlorhexidine (,). Antifungal agents were tested in serial 2-fold dilutions (0.06–32.0 mg/L) for planktonic and sessile cells. Fluconazole was ineffective (MICs of >32 mg/L) against planktonic and sessile communities, whereas voriconazole displayed minimal activity against planktonic cells (Table 1, 2). Although liposomal amphotericin B was active against planktonic C. auris at 0.25–1.0 mg/L, up to 16 mg/L was required to reduce biofilm metabolic viability by 90%. Amphotericin B was more effective, requiring 4 mg/L to kill biofilms. Micafungin was the most active echinocandin, requiring <0.5 mg/L to inhibit planktonic cells, compared with 2–32 mg/L for caspofungin. However, these 2 antifungal agents were ineffective against biofilms, requiring >32 mg/L to inhibit sessile cells. Of note, chlorhexidine exhibited the greatest activity, requiring <0.02% to effectively inhibit planktonic and sessile cells across all strains tested. All strains showed similar sensitivity profiles, with the exception of strain 10, for which voriconazole was required in higher concentrations and caspofungin in lower concentrations to effectively inhibit planktonic growth.
Table 1

Planktonic susceptibility profiles of 7 antifungals against Candida auris yeast

Drug
Planktonic MIC*
Strain 2
Strain 6
Strain 10
Strain 12
Fluconazole>32>32>32>32
Voriconazole88321
Caspofungin32322>32
Micafungin0.5<0.0625<0.06<0.0625
Liposomal amphotericin B0.250.250.51
Amphotericin B0.250.250.50.5
Chlorhexidine, %<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02

*Values are mg/L except as indicated. All MIC tests were performed on 3 independent occasions, showing identical results each time.

Table 2

Sessile susceptibility profiles of 7 antifungals against Candida auris yeast

Drug
Sessile MIC*
Strain 2
Strain 6
Strain 10
Strain 12
Fluconazole>32>32>32>32
Voriconazole>32>32>32>32
Caspofungin>32>32>32>32
Micafungin>32>320.25>32
Liposomal amphotericin B281616
Amphotericin B2424
Chlorhexidine, %<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02

*Values are mg/L except as indicated. Sessile MICs are defined as a 90% inhibition of the metabolic dye XTT, 2,3-Bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide inner salt (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) compared with the untreated control; MIC tests were performed on 3 independent occasions and showed identical results each time.

*Values are mg/L except as indicated. All MIC tests were performed on 3 independent occasions, showing identical results each time. *Values are mg/L except as indicated. Sessile MICs are defined as a 90% inhibition of the metabolic dye XTT, 2,3-Bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide inner salt (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) compared with the untreated control; MIC tests were performed on 3 independent occasions and showed identical results each time. Killing assays in Galleria mellonella were performed, as previously described (), to assess the pathogenicity of each Candida species. Ten G. mellonella larvae (Livefoods Direct Ltd, Sheffield, UK) with bodyweights of ≈300 mg were used for each test group. Standardized inoculums of 106 and 105 and to 5 × 105 and 5 × 104 cells/larvae (Figure 2) in PBS, were injected into the hemocoel, as previously described (). We assessed pathogenicity using a Kaplan-Meier plot, monitoring the percent survival over 5 days. Survival data for 5 × 105 cells/larvae showed a significant difference in the killing of larvae by C. glabrata and the other Candida species (p<0.0001) (Figure 2, panel B). Although C. albicans and C. auris had similar kill kinetics in this model, infection with nonaggregative C. auris strain 10 achieved a 100% death rate within 48 h, compared with a rate of ≈87% with C. albicans (p = 0.3076). Moreover, nonaggregative C. auris was significantly more pathogenic than C. albicans when a lower inoculum of 105 (p<0.05) and 5 × 104 cells/larvae (p<0.01) was administered. These data, along with those of Borman et al. (), suggest that the nonaggregative C. auris phenotype has the capacity to form biofilms with enhanced virulence capacity.
Figure 2

Pathogenicity of Candida species yeast infections in vivo. Galleria mellonella larvae were infected with 106 (A), 5 × 105 (B), 105 (C), and 5 × 104 (D) cells/larvae of C. albicans, C. glabrata, and 4 C. auris strains, and larvae survival measured every 12 h over 5 d. Ten samples of each yeast were used, and experiments were performed on 3 independent occasions. Data represents the mean percentage survival, as determined using a Kaplan-Meier plot. PBS and controls, which were pierced only, were also included and had no effect on larvae survival. Results show that C. auris and C. albicans infection exhibit similar pathogenicity.

Pathogenicity of Candida species yeast infections in vivo. Galleria mellonella larvae were infected with 106 (A), 5 × 105 (B), 105 (C), and 5 × 104 (D) cells/larvae of C. albicans, C. glabrata, and 4 C. auris strains, and larvae survival measured every 12 h over 5 d. Ten samples of each yeast were used, and experiments were performed on 3 independent occasions. Data represents the mean percentage survival, as determined using a Kaplan-Meier plot. PBS and controls, which were pierced only, were also included and had no effect on larvae survival. Results show that C. auris and C. albicans infection exhibit similar pathogenicity.

Conclusions

Biofilm formation is a key driver of C. albicans pathogenicity and is associated with patient death (,). We show that C. auris can differentially adhere to polymeric surfaces, form biofilms, and resist antifungal agents that are active against its planktonic counterparts. Of particular interest, caspofungin was predominately inactive against C. auris biofilms; this finding was unexpected because caspofungin is normally highly effective against Candida biofilms. These features contribute not only to C. auris virulence but also to its survival in hospital environments, increasing its ability to cause outbreaks (). The results of the in vivo model used in this study are in line with our clinical experience and validated by findings in other in vivo studies (), affirming that C. auris is highly virulent or more virulent than C. albicans. Although unable to form biofilms equivalent to C. albicans, C. auris has a noteworthy virulence capacity that merits further exploration, particularly given the apparent heterogeneity associated with aggregative capacity. These factors, together with the innate resistance of C. auris to most antifungal agents, may explain why it is an emerging pathogen. Our findings suggest it is improbable that the spread and prevalence of C. auris can be controlled with antifungal stewardship approaches alone. We showed that chlorhexidine is effective against C. auris planktonic and sessile communities. Thus, use of this disinfectant can be advocated for topical control of C. auris at standard concentrations used for skin and wound cleansing and disinfection (0.05%–4.0%). Infection-prevention measures targeting C. auris biofilms in patients, on medical devices (e.g., equipment in contact with patients), and in the hospital environment will be required.
  12 in total

1.  Biofilm formation and genotyping of Candida haemulonii, Candida pseudohaemulonii, and a proposed new species (Candida auris) isolates from Korea.

Authors:  Bong Joon Oh; Jong Hee Shin; Mi-Na Kim; Heungsup Sung; Kyungwon Lee; Min Young Joo; Myung Geun Shin; Soon Pal Suh; Dong Wook Ryang
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans biofilms.

Authors:  G Ramage; K Vande Walle; B L Wickes; J L López-Ribot
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris Misidentified as Candida haemulonii: Characterization by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry and DNA Sequencing and Its Antifungal Susceptibility Profile Variability by Vitek 2, CLSI Broth Microdilution, and Etest Method.

Authors:  Shallu Kathuria; Pradeep K Singh; Cheshta Sharma; Anupam Prakash; Aradhana Masih; Anil Kumar; Jacques F Meis; Anuradha Chowdhary
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Itraconazole-resistant Candida auris with phospholipase, proteinase and hemolysin activity from a case of vulvovaginitis.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; Tuhina Banerjee; Chandra Bhan Pratap; Ragini Tilak
Journal:  J Infect Dev Ctries       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  First report of Candida auris in America: Clinical and microbiological aspects of 18 episodes of candidemia.

Authors:  Belinda Calvo; Analy S A Melo; Armindo Perozo-Mena; Martin Hernandez; Elaine Cristina Francisco; Ferry Hagen; Jacques F Meis; Arnaldo Lopes Colombo
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 6.072

6.  Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital.

Authors:  Kazuo Satoh; Koichi Makimura; Yayoi Hasumi; Yayoi Nishiyama; Katsuhisa Uchida; Hideyo Yamaguchi
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.955

7.  Biofilm formation is a risk factor for mortality in patients with Candida albicans bloodstream infection-Scotland, 2012-2013.

Authors:  R Rajendran; L Sherry; C J Nile; A Sherriff; E M Johnson; M F Hanson; C Williams; C A Munro; B J Jones; G Ramage
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Draft genome of a commonly misdiagnosed multidrug resistant pathogen Candida auris.

Authors:  Sharanya Chatterjee; Shuba Varshini Alampalli; Rishi Kumar Nageshan; Sivarajan T Chettiar; Sangeeta Joshi; Utpal S Tatu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Biofilms formed by Candida albicans bloodstream isolates display phenotypic and transcriptional heterogeneity that are associated with resistance and pathogenicity.

Authors:  Leighann Sherry; Ranjith Rajendran; David F Lappin; Elisa Borghi; Federica Perdoni; Monica Falleni; Delfina Tosi; Karen Smith; Craig Williams; Brian Jones; Chris J Nile; Gordon Ramage
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  A Prospective Surveillance Study of Candidaemia: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Antifungal Treatment and Outcome in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Ranjith Rajendran; Leighann Sherry; Ashutosh Deshpande; Elizabeth M Johnson; Mary F Hanson; Craig Williams; Carol A Munro; Brian L Jones; Gordon Ramage
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  90 in total

1.  Drosophila melanogaster as a model to study virulence and azole treatment of the emerging pathogen Candida auris.

Authors:  Sebastian Wurster; Ashwini Bandi; Nicholas D Beyda; Nathaniel D Albert; Nitya M Raman; Isaam I Raad; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Candida auris: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Anna Jeffery-Smith; Surabhi K Taori; Silke Schelenz; Katie Jeffery; Elizabeth M Johnson; Andrew Borman; Rohini Manuel; Colin S Brown
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Candida auris: a fungus with identity crisis.

Authors:  Taissa Vila; Ahmed S Sultan; Daniel Montelongo-Jauregui; Mary Ann Jabra-Rizk
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Biofilms Formed by Isolates from Recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis Patients Are Heterogeneous and Insensitive to Fluconazole.

Authors:  Leighann Sherry; Ryan Kean; Emily McKloud; Lindsay E O'Donnell; Rebecca Metcalfe; Brian L Jones; Gordon Ramage
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Fungal Pathogens: Shape-Shifting Invaders.

Authors:  Kyunghun Min; Aaron M Neiman; James B Konopka
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 17.079

6.  Nitroglycerin-Citrate-Ethanol Catheter Lock Solution Is Highly Effective for In Vitro Eradication of Candida auris Biofilm.

Authors:  Nylev Vargas-Cruz; Ruth A Reitzel; Joel Rosenblatt; Anne-Marie Chaftari; Rita Wilson Dib; Ray Hachem; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Issam I Raad
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Activity of anti-CR3-RP polyclonal antibody against biofilms formed by Candida auris, a multidrug-resistant emerging fungal pathogen.

Authors:  Jaroslava Dekkerová; Jose L Lopez-Ribot; Helena Bujdáková
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Pharmacodynamic Optimization for Treatment of Invasive Candida auris Infection.

Authors:  Alexander J Lepak; Miao Zhao; Elizabeth L Berkow; Shawn R Lockhart; David R Andes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  A Selective Medium for Isolation and Detection of Candida auris, an Emerging Pathogen.

Authors:  Sourav Das; Shreya Singh; Yamini Tawde; Arunaloke Chakrabarti; Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy; Harsimran Kaur; Shamanth A Shankarnarayan; Anup Ghosh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Candida auris: an Emerging Fungal Pathogen.

Authors:  Emily S Spivak; Kimberly E Hanson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.