Literature DB >> 28095881

Renal function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease receiving intravenous ferric carboxymaltose: an analysis of the randomized FIND-CKD trial.

Iain C Macdougall1, Andreas H Bock2, Fernando Carrera3, Kai-Uwe Eckardt4, Carlo Gaillard5, David Van Wyck6, Yvonne Meier7, Sylvain Larroque7, Simon D Roger8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies demonstrate renal proximal tubular injury after administration of some intravenous iron preparations but clinical data on renal effects of intravenous iron are sparse.
METHODS: FIND-CKD was a 56-week, randomized, open-label, multicenter study in which patients with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD), anemia and iron deficiency without erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy received intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), targeting either higher (400-600 μg/L) or lower (100-200 μg/L) ferritin values, or oral iron.
RESULTS: Mean (SD) eGFR at baseline was 34.9 (11.3), 32.8 (10.8) and 34.2 (12.3) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the high ferritin FCM (n = 97), low ferritin FCM (n = 89) and oral iron (n = 167) groups, respectively. Corresponding values at month 12 were 35.6 (13.8), 32.1 (12.7) and 33.4 (14.5) mL/min/1.73 m2. The pre-specified endpoint of mean (SE) change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 was +0.7 (0.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 with high ferritin FCM (p = 0.15 versus oral iron), -0.9 (0.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 with low ferritin FCM (p = 0.99 versus oral iron) and -0.9 (0.7) mL/min/1.73 m2 with oral iron. No significant association was detected between quartiles of FCM dose, change in ferritin or change in TSAT versus change in eGFR. Dialysis initiation was similar between groups. Renal adverse events were rare, with no indication of between-group differences.
CONCLUSION: Intravenous FCM at doses that maintained ferritin levels of 100-200 μg/L or 400-600 μg/L did not negatively impact renal function (eGFR) in patients with ND-CKD over 12 months versus oral iron, and eGFR remained stable. These findings show no evidence of renal toxicity following intravenous FCM over a 1-year period. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00994318 (first registration 12 October 2009).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic kidney disease; Ferinject; Ferric carboxymaltose; Intravenous; Renal function; eGFR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28095881      PMCID: PMC5240256          DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0444-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Nephrol        ISSN: 1471-2369            Impact factor:   2.388


Background

The use of iron therapy to manage renal anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has increased significantly in recent years [1], partly in response to concerns about the safety of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapies [2, 3]. Randomized trials have shown intravenous (IV) iron therapy to be more effective than oral iron in terms of replenishing depleted iron stores and improving anemia in patients on dialysis [4-6]. In non-dialysis dependent CKD (ND-CKD), trials have confirmed the benefits of IV versus oral iron therapy but have typically been no longer than 8 weeks in duration [7-11]. Recently, the randomized 56-week FIND-CKD study compared IV ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) versus oral iron in patients with ND-CKD, anemia, and iron deficiency not receiving ESA therapy [12]. Intravenous FCM targeting a ferritin level of 400–600 μg/L delayed and/or reduced the need for other anemia management (including ESAs) significantly at 1 year compared to patients receiving oral iron, and the hematopoietic response was more rapid. However, concerns exist about the potential renal toxicity of IV iron therapy [13]. Rapid release of large amounts of iron into the bloodstream could generate ‘free’ iron in the circulation (non-transferrin bound iron, NTBI) which may promote oxidative stress [14, 15]. Some IV iron complexes such as ferric gluconate contain weakly-bound iron that is released readily and quickly [15]. In contrast, animal models have shown, that oxidative stress does not increase with more stable IV iron complexes such as FCM [16-18]. Clinical evidence relating to a possible effect of IV iron therapy on renal function is limited. Single-dose and short-term (5-week) studies from one center have indicated that iron sucrose may induce renal injury mediated by oxidative stress and inflammation [19-23]. However, the recently published REVOKE study, which randomized patients with ND-CKD to IV iron sucrose or oral iron, showed neither a difference in renal function decline (based on GFR measured by iothalamate clearance) nor in proteinuria during follow-up lasting up to 2 years [24]. Confirmatory data are clearly important. The FIND-CKD trial included protocol-specified monitoring of renal function in over 600 patients with ND-CKD, based on estimated GFR (eGFR), throughout the 1-year study [25]. Data were analyzed to compare renal outcomes in patients randomized to IV FCM using two different dosing regimens aiming for different target ferritin concentrations, with those in patients receiving oral iron.

Methods

Study design

FIND-CKD was a 56-week, open-label, multicenter, prospective, randomized, three-arm study undertaken during December 2009 to January 2012 at 193 nephrology centers in 20 countries (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00994318) [25].

Patient population

Adult patients (≥18 years) with ND-CKD were eligible for inclusion if (a) at least one Hb level was between 9 and 11 g/dL within 4 weeks of randomization, (b) any ferritin level was <100 μg/L, or <200 μg/L with transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20%, within 4 weeks of randomization, (c) eGFR was ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD-4] equation [26]), the prior rate of eGFR loss was ≤12 mL/min/1.73 m2/year and predicted eGFR at 12 months based on previous decline was ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m2, and (d) no ESA had been administered within 4 months prior to randomization. Estimates of prior eGFR loss were based on at least two values over at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, and preferably three values over at least 3 months. Key exclusion criteria included current dialysis, anticipated dialysis or transplantation during the study, anemia due to reasons other than iron deficiency, a documented history of discontinuing oral iron products due to significant gastrointestinal distress, known active infection, C-reactive protein >20 mg/L, overt bleeding, active malignancy, chronic liver disease, concomitant New York Heart Association Class IV heart failure and poorly controlled hypertension (>160 mmHg systolic pressure or >100 mmHg diastolic pressure).

Randomization and intervention

Eligible patients were randomized centrally via a central interactive voice-response system in a 1:1:2 ratio to high ferritin FCM, low ferritin FCM or oral iron. The dose of FCM (Ferinject®, Vifor International, St Gallen, Switzerland) in the high ferritin and low ferritin FCM groups was adjusted to target a ferritin level of 400−600 μg/L and 100–200 μg/L, respectively. An initial single dose was administered on day 0: 1000 mg iron as FCM in the high ferritin FCM group (500 mg iron on days 0 and 7 in patients weighing ≤66 kg) and 200 mg iron as FCM in the low ferritin FCM group if ferritin was <100 μg/L. During weeks 4 to 48, FCM was administered every 4 weeks in the high ferritin FCM group at a dose of 500 mg iron if ferritin was in the range 200 to <400 μg/L, and at a dose of 1000 mg iron if ferritin was <200 μg/L, and in the low ferritin FCM group at a dose of 200 mg iron if ferritin was <100 μg/L. In both groups, dosing was withheld if TSAT was ≥40%. Oral iron therapy consisted of commercially-available ferrous sulfate at a dose of 304 mg (100 mg of iron) twice daily to week 52. During the first 8 weeks after randomization, patients were not to receive ESAs, blood transfusion or any anemia therapy other than study drug unless there was an absolute requirement, after which ESAs and other therapies were permitted according to local practice if the Hb was <10 g/dL.

Assessment of renal function

Renal function was assessed by eGFR, with values calculated locally and provided by the study sites using the MDRD-4 formula [26]. Estimated GFR was recorded at baseline and at every 3 months throughout the 12-month study period. The change in eGFR from baseline to the end of the study was a pre-specified secondary endpoint of the trial. GFR was estimated by the MDRD-4 formula [26]. As a post hoc sensitivity analysis, GFR was also estimated by the creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula [27]. CKD-EPI values were calculated centrally using locally-measured serum creatinine levels. The percentage of patients starting dialysis was a further pre-specified secondary endpoint.

Statistical analysis

All analyses of renal function were exploratory. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) modeling was used to compare the change in eGFR values from baseline to month 12 between groups based on least square (LS) mean values using a repeated fixed effects model with treatment, visit and pooled country as factors, baseline eGFR as covariate, and treatment-by-visit as an interaction. Change in eGFR at month 12 was summarized in subpopulations of patients according to age (≤ or > median), gender, body mass index (BMI, ≤ or > median), baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressure (≤ or > median), mean arterial pressure and history of diabetes at baseline. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis including demographics and baseline characteristics (age, gender, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, diabetic status, prior use of angiotensin converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker [ARB] medications) was performed to check for potential confounding effect and best impacting factor on the analysis of treatment effect. For the proportion of patients requiring dialysis, logistic regression analyses were performed and odds ratios (ORs) were used to compare treatment groups. Post hoc, absolute eGFR values and the change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 were analyzed according to (i) quartiles of total FCM dose throughout the 12-month study using pooled data from both FCM treatment groups (ii) quartiles of change in ferritin level from baseline to month 12 across all patients (iii) quartiles of change in TSAT level from baseline to month 12 across all patients. Renal function was analyzed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of randomized treatment and who attended at least one post-baseline visit. Patients were excluded from the analysis of change in eGFR to month 12 if (a) they reached the primary event before month 12 (i.e. received alternative management for anemia) or (b) the randomized treatment regimen was permanently discontinued before month 12. Within this cohort, calculations for the change in eGFR, ferritin and TSAT from baseline to month 12 were based on the subpopulations of patients who had values available at both time points. Adverse events were analyzed in the safety population, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of randomized study drug. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS Version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Study population

In total, 613 patients were randomized and included in the ITT population. Estimated GFR was measured at baseline in all patients. Of 519 patients who completed the study, 166 patients had started another anemia management and/or stopped the randomized study regimen before month 12, and were excluded from analyses. Thus eGFR values at both baseline and month 12 were analyzed in 353 patients (97, 89 and 167 patients in the high ferritin FCM group, the low ferritin FCM group and the oral iron group, respectively). These patients were included in the current analysis. The demographics and other characteristics of this subpopulation (Table 1) did not differ from the total ITT population (Additional file 1: Table S1) and were comparable between groups.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics for patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12

High ferritin FCM (n = 97)Low ferritin FCM (n = 89)Oral iron(n = 167)
Age, years69.3 (12.9)69.0 (12.1)69.6 (12.7)
Female gender, n (%)61 ((62.9)56 (62.9)106 (63.5)
White race, n (%)93 (95.9)83 (93.3)159 (95.2)
Body mass index, kg/m2 30.5 (6.8)30.0 (5.3)29.4 (5.4)
History of diabetes, n (%)61 (62.9)59 (66.3)106 (63.5)
Endogenous erythropoietin, mIU/mL29.4 (24.6)29.6 (27.4)26.3 (20.9)
Hb, g/dL10.4 (0.7)10.5 (0.9)10.7 (0.6)
Ferritin, μg/L54.2 94.9)45.8 (44.3)52.4 (39.9)
TSAT, %16.3 (20.2)14.9 (7.5)14.8 (7.0)
C-reactive protein, mg/L7.4 (13.4)5.7 (5.9)5.3 (6.5)
ACE inhibitor therapy prior to study entry, n (%)a 32 (33.0)37 (41.6)69 (41.3)
Angiotensin II antagonist therapy prior to study entry, n (%)b 41 (42.3)33 (37.1)77 (46.1)

Continuous variables are shown as mean (SD)

ACE angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, FCM ferric carboxymaltose, Hb hemoglobin, TSAT transferrin saturation

aIncludes patients receiving ACE inhibitor combinations

bIncludes patients receiving angiotensin II antagonist combinations

Baseline characteristics for patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12 Continuous variables are shown as mean (SD) ACE angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, FCM ferric carboxymaltose, Hb hemoglobin, TSAT transferrin saturation aIncludes patients receiving ACE inhibitor combinations bIncludes patients receiving angiotensin II antagonist combinations Baseline eGFR in this subpopulation of patients was similar between treatment groups (Table 2) and did not show any relevant differences to baseline values in the total ITT population (mean [SD] 32.8 [11.7] mL/min/1.73 m2, 31.5 [10.7] mL/min/1.73m2and 32.3 [11.6] mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, in the high ferritin FCM, low ferritin FCM and oral iron groups).
Table 2

Estimated GFR (eGFR) for patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12

High ferritin FCM (n = 97)Low ferritin FCM (n = 89)Oral iron (n = 167)
eGFR at baseline (MDRD), mL/min/1.73 m2
 Mean (SD)34.9 (11.3)32.8 (10.8)34.2 (12.3)
 ≥ 60, n (%)1 (1.0)1 (1.1)3 (1.8)
 30 to <60, n (%)62 (63.9)51 (57.3)101 (60.5)
 15 to <30, n (%)34 (35.1)37 (41.6)60 (35.9)
 < 15, n (%)003 (1.8)
eGFR at month 12 (MDRD), mL/min/1.73 m2
 Mean (SD)35.6 (13.8)32.1 (12.7)33.4 (14.5)
 ≥ 60, n (%)7 (7.2)4 (4.5)7 (4.2)
 30 to <60, n (%)54 (55.7)40 (44.9)83 (49.7)
 15 to <30, n (%)32 (33.0)39 (43.8)65 (38.9)
 < 15, n (%)4 (4.1)6 (6.7)12 (7.2)
Change from baseline to month 12, LS mean (SE) (MDRD), mL/min/1.73 m2 0.7 (0.9)-0.9 (0.9)-0.9 (0.7)
p value for change vs oral irona 0.150.99Reference
Relative change from baseline to month 12, LS mean (SE) (MDRD), %3.1 (2.6)-2.4 (2.7)-2.2 (2.0)
p value for change vs oral irona 0.0980.95Reference
eGFR (CKD-EPI) mL/min/1.73 m2 n = 82 n = 68 n = 137
 Mean (SD) at baseline33.5 (11.9)32.0 (11.8)32.5 (13.4)
 Mean (SD) at month 1234.8 (13.1)31.1 (13.5)31.0 (14.8)
 Change, LS mean (SE), mL/min/1.73 m2 1.3 (1.0)-1.2 (1.0)-1.7 (0.7)
p value for change vs oral irona 0.0120.68Reference

eGFR was estimated by the MDRD-4 equation [27] at the local laboratory

CI confidence interval, CKD-EPI Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), eGFR estimated GFR, FCM ferric carboxymaltose, LS least squares, MDRD Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, SE standard error

aAnalysis of covariance analysis based on least square mean values, using repeated measures

Estimated GFR (eGFR) for patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12 eGFR was estimated by the MDRD-4 equation [27] at the local laboratory CI confidence interval, CKD-EPI Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), eGFR estimated GFR, FCM ferric carboxymaltose, LS least squares, MDRD Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, SE standard error aAnalysis of covariance analysis based on least square mean values, using repeated measures Four patients in this cohort of 353 patients were included against protocol with baseline eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2: one high ferritin FCM patient (63 mL/min/1.73 m2), one low ferritin FCM patient (61 mL/min/1.73 m2) and two patients in the oral iron group (66 and 77 mL/min/1.73 m2). Three patients in the oral iron group contravened the exclusion criterion that eGFR loss was to be no more than 12 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year.

Change in renal function

Values for eGFR showed no change in any of the three treatment groups throughout the 12-month study (Fig. 1). At month 12, mean (SD) eGFR was 35.6 (13.8) mL/min/1.73 m2, 32.1 (12.7) mL/min/1.73 m2 and 33.4 (14.5) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The pre-defined endpoint of change from baseline to month 12 was +0.7 (0.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the high ferritin FCM group, -0.9 (0.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the low ferritin FCM group and -0.9 (0.7) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the oral iron group (least square [LS] mean [SE] values). There were no significant differences in the change from baseline to month 12 for either FCM group versus oral iron (p = 0.15 for the high ferritin group, p = 0.99 for the low ferritin FCM group). The mean (SE) percentage change in eGFR was 3.1 (2.6)% in the high ferritin FCM group (p = 0.098 versus oral iron) (Table 2).
Fig. 1

Estimated GFR to month 12 according to treatment group in patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12. Values are shown as mean (SD). FCM, ferric carboxymaltose; eGFR, estimated GFR

Estimated GFR to month 12 according to treatment group in patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12. Values are shown as mean (SD). FCM, ferric carboxymaltose; eGFR, estimated GFR As a sensitivity analysis, eGFR was also calculated using the CKD-EPI formula. Serum creatinine values were provided for central calculation of CKD-EPI values in 82, 68 and 137 patients in the high ferritin FCM, low ferritin FCM and oral iron groups, respectively. Based on the CKD-EPI formula, there was a significant increase in eGFR from baseline to month 12 for the high ferritin FCM group versus oral iron (p = 0.012) (Table 2). When the change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 was assessed in subpopulations of patients according to age, gender, BMI, presence/absence of diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure, no apparent influence of treatment group was observed (Additional file 2: Table 2).

Change in renal function according to FCM dose

The mean (SD) total dose of FCM 2793 (932) mg iron in the high ferritin group and 1205 (626) mg iron in the low ferritin group among patients with eGFR data available at baseline and month 12 (excluding patients who started another anemia therapy or permanently discontinued study treatment.) The change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 showed no association with total FCM dose when plotted individually for patients in either the high ferritin FCM or low ferritin FCM groups (Additional file 3: Figure S1). Using pooled data from both FCM groups, the change in eGFR to month 12 was analyzed by quartiles of total FCM dose (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 2

Absolute estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 according to quartiles of (a) total ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) dose to month 12 in patients randomized to high ferritin FCM or low ferritin FCM (b) change in ferritin from baseline to month 12 across all treatment groups and (c) change in transferrin saturation (TSAT) from baseline at month 12 across all treatment groups. Data are shown for patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12. Change in eGFR is shown as least squares (LS) mean values. MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease

Absolute estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 according to quartiles of (a) total ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) dose to month 12 in patients randomized to high ferritin FCM or low ferritin FCM (b) change in ferritin from baseline to month 12 across all treatment groups and (c) change in transferrin saturation (TSAT) from baseline at month 12 across all treatment groups. Data are shown for patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12. Change in eGFR is shown as least squares (LS) mean values. MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease The multivariate model indicated that age (p = 0.007), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.004), diabetic status (p = 0.058) and prior use of ACE inhibitor therapy (p = 0.054) exerted an impact on the change in eGFR (MDRD) to month 12. When these factors were added into the repeated measures model over time, the least square mean values for treatment effect were similar for the high ferritin FCM, low ferritin FCM and oral iron groups (0.7, -0.8 and -0.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively; p = 0.14 for high ferritin FCM versus oral iron, p = 0.92 for low ferritin FCM versus oral iron). When repeated using the CKD-EPI equation to estimate GFR, only age (p = 0.042) and systolic blood pressure (p = 0.004) were found to influence the change in eGFR to month 12. Inclusion of these two factors in the repeated measure model produced LS mean values of 1.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the high ferritin FCM group, -1.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the low ferritin FCM group and -1.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the oral iron group (p = 0.010 versus high ferritin FCM, p = 0.613 versus low ferritin FCM).

Change in renal function according to iron status

Mean ferritin levels were within the pre-specified target ranges from week 12 to the end of the study in both of the FCM treatment arms (Additional file 4: Figure S2a). At month 12, the mean (SD) change in ferritin from baseline was 455 (116), 81 (59) and 139 (111) μg/L in the high ferritin FCM, low ferritin FCM and oral iron groups, respectively, among patients with eGFR available at baseline and month 12. The change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 showed no significant association with the change in ferritin over the same period when analyzed by quartiles (Fig. 2b). TSAT levels to month 12 are shown in Additional file 4: Figure S2b. As observed for ferritin levels, the change in eGFR showed no significant differences between quartiles of change in TSAT (Fig. 2c).

Renal events

In total, 16/613 patients in the ITT population (2.6%) progressed to dialysis by month 12 (5 high ferritin FCM, 1 low ferritin FCM, 10 oral iron). There was no significant difference in the risk of dialysis for either FCM group versus oral iron: OR 1.01 (95% CI 0.34, 3.00; p = 0.99) for the high ferritin FCM group and OR 0.20 (95% CI 0.03, 1.56; p = 0.12) for the low ferritin group. No patient underwent renal transplantation. Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events related to renal function were low with no indication of clinically relevant differences between treatment groups (Additional file 5: Table S3).

Discussion

Results from the randomized FIND-CKD trial show that compared to oral iron, administration of IV FCM in doses that maintain ferritin levels of 100–200 μg/L or 400–600 μg/L does not negatively impact renal function, as determined by eGFR, in patients with ND-CKD after 1 year. Mean eGFR remained stable during the study in both the FCM treatment groups, and the change in eGFR to 1 year did not differ from that seen in patients treated with oral iron therapy, either on univariate or multivariate analysis. These findings, calculated using the pre-specified MDRD-4 formula, were confirmed when GFR was estimated by the more recently developed CKD-EPI formula [28]. Indeed, if anything, there was an increase in eGFR in the patients in the high-ferritin FCM arm compared to oral iron using the CKD-EPI formula (p = 0.012) which was confirmed on multivariate analysis. There was no difference between groups in the rate of progression to dialysis and no evidence of increased renal adverse events in either FCM treatment group. Clinical studies measuring the short- or long-term effect of IV iron complexes on renal function versus controls are relatively scarce. Van Wyck et al. randomized 188 patients with ND-CKD to a total dose of 1000 mg iron as iron sucrose (infused over 3.5–4 h) or oral iron sulfate [10]. At the end of the 6-week study, there was a mean decrease in eGFR in both treatment arms, but the decrease was smaller in the iron sucrose arm (-1.45 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus -4.40 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the oral iron arm; p = 0.01). McMahon et al. undertook a randomized trial of iron sucrose (100–200 mg every two months) or oral iron sulfate for 12 months in patients with ND-CKD who were non-anemic (Hb ≥11 g/dL) and iron replete (ferritin >300 μg/L and TSAT >25%) at baseline, and has described a similar change in eGFR in both treatment groups over the study period [29]. This similarity was observed despite elevated iron indices in the IV iron group at month 12 (mean ferritin 363 μg/L versus 125 μg/L in the oral iron group; TSAT 30% versus 21%). However, the study analyzed only 85 patients, such that a relatively small effect on renal function may have remained undetected, and the study protocol specified only modest doses of iron supplementation in both the IV and oral iron groups (the actual amount administered was not specified). Lastly, a recent randomized trial of IV iron sucrose versus oral iron showed no change in measured GFR over 2 years’ follow-up between the two arms of the study [24]. Other randomized trials comparing IV iron versus oral iron have not reported renal function, but there was no evidence of a higher rate of renal adverse events in the IV iron groups versus patients receiving oral iron therapy [7–9, 11]. Regarding a possible effect of IV iron on proteinuria, in a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over study of eight patients with ND-CKD, Leehey et al. assessed the effect of a single dose of ferric gluconate at a dose of 125 mg iron infused over one hour, or 250 mg iron over two hours [21]. They observed no evidence of acute renal injury, as assessed by albuminuria, proteinuria or enzymuria, although plasma levels of the oxidative stress marker malondialdehyde (MDA) increased with both doses. Another randomized trial, by Agarwal and colleagues, administered a single dose of 100 mg iron sucrose to 20 subjects with CKD stage 3 or 4, and also found an increase in MDA versus controls, accompanied by transient proteinuria and enzymuria which resolved within 24 h [22]. Similar analyses have been performed in repeated dose studies. In a multicenter, randomized trial, 62 patients with ND-CKD and iron deficiency anemia received a weekly dose of either iron sucrose or ferric gluconate (100 mg) for 5 weeks [19]. Basal levels of proteinuria were similar, but increased post-dosing, with a greater increase with iron sucrose than ferric gluconate [19]. This was consistent with results from an earlier single-dose study from the same group which showed that a single dose of iron sucrose (100 mg) provoked a significantly higher urinary protein to creatinine ratio than ferric gluconate [20]. The difference between iron sucrose and ferric gluconate is somewhat unexpected, since the latter is considered to be less stable. Other authors have reported that rapid infusion (5 min) of iron dextran or iron sucrose results in generation of reactive oxygen species [15], whereas a study of 20 iron-replete dialysis patients found that slow infusion (60 min) of these preparations did not affect biomarkers of oxidative stress or inflammation [30] (neither study measured renal function). Finally, in the prospective REVOKE trial [24], which was designed to detect renal toxicity of IV iron, proteinuria was similar in the IV iron sucrose and oral iron arms. In the current study, FCM-treated patients received an initial single dose of up to 1000 mg iron in the high ferritin group, or 200 mg in the low ferritin group (each infused over 15 min), with mean total doses of ~2800 mg iron and ~1200 mg iron, respectively, among patients with eGFR data available at baseline and month 12. A post hoc analysis indicated that within this range, there was no association between quartiles of FCM dose and the change in eGFR during the 12 months after the start of FCM therapy. Moreover, neither absolute levels of ferritin (a marker for iron stores) nor TSAT (a marker for iron availability) at month 12, nor the change in ferritin or TSAT during the study, showed an association with change in eGFR. Thus, the significant increase in ferritin levels achieved in the cohort of patients randomized to high ferritin FCM was not associated with a change in renal function.

Conclusions

The main limitation of these findings is the 1-year duration of the FIND-CKD trial which, while longer than most previous comparative studies of IV versus oral iron [7–11, 24], may not be adequate to detect a long-term effect on renal function. Within the full study cohort, we restricted the analysis to the patients who remained on the randomized study drug for the full 12-month study; any patient in whom another anemia therapy was introduced or who discontinued the study prematurely was excluded. While this reduced the population size, we believe that this was the most rigorous analytical approach. No patient discontinued the study due to decreasing renal function so bias due to selective discontinuation can be ruled out. Moreover, baseline and month 12 values for eGFR (and the extent of change from baseline to month 12) were similar in each treatment group to those seen in the full ITT population [25]. A post hoc repeated measured modeling calculation showed that the population analyzed here (n = 353) had a 15 and 18% power, respectively, to detect a difference of 1.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the change in eGFR between the high and low ferritin FCM groups, and between the high ferritin FCM and oral iron groups (40 and 49%, respectively, to detect a difference of 2 mL/min/1.73 m2). The study used eGFR as the indicator of renal function rather than a method to measure GFR. Furthermore, GFR estimates were based on locally determined serum creatinine values, so that variability between methods at different sites cannot be excluded. It is unlikely, however, that such variations would have obscured differences between treatment groups, since each patient served as their own control at baseline using the same assay. Another limitation is that urinary protein excretion and biomarkers of renal tubular toxicity were not recorded. Also, patients previously showing a rapidly progressive loss of renal function at screening were excluded from the study. Indeed, it is remarkable that the annual loss of eGFR was no more than 1.6 mL/min/1.732 in any group. Other eligibility criteria for the study may have contributed to this stability, notably exclusion of patients with previous eGFR loss >12 mL/min/1.73 m2/year but also, for example, those with poorly controlled hypertension. Moreover, approximately three-quarters of patients were receiving an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Lastly, in terms of the study design, the absence of a placebo arm precludes a comparison of renal function using IV iron versus no treatment and would have contributed to understanding if the observed stability of renal function was partly a trial effect. In conclusion, results from this study indicate a lack of renal toxicity of IV iron therapy in patients with relatively stable renal function. It is important to note that these results do not necessarily apply to other IV iron preparations, due to varying molecular structures and physiochemical properties, or to patients with other characteristics (for example those receiving dialysis). Assessment of longer-term effects of IV iron, however, is required.
Table 3

FIND-CKD trial: Ethics Committee approvals

CountrySite NrEthic Committee
Australia0101Bellberry HREC 229 Greenhill Road Dulwich SA 5O65
Australia0102Bellberry HREC 229 Greenhill Road Dulwich SA 5O65
Australia0103Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout RoadNew Lambton Heights NSW 23O5
Australia0104Research Ethics Committee Royal Adelaide Hospital North TerraceAdelaide SA 5OOO
Australia0105Human Research Ethics Committee Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville, Victoria 3O5O
Australia0106Eastern Health HREC Level 2, 5 Arnold Street Box Hill, Victoria 3f28
Australia0106Eastern Health HREC Level 2, 5 Arnold Street Box Hill, Victoria 3f29
Australia0107Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout RoadNew Lambton Heights NSW 23O5
Australia0108PAH Human Research Ethics Committee Tafe 3, Level 2, Bldg 35Princess Alexandra Hospital Ispswich Road Woolloongabba, QLD 4fO2
Australia9Ballarat Health Services and St. John of God Health Care Ethics CommitteeBase Hospital Drummond Street North PO Box 577 Ballarat 3353
Australia0110Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout RoadNew Lambton Heights NSW 2305
Australia0111Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout RoadNew Lambton Heights NSW 2306
Australia0111Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital HREC University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Level 4, RBWH HERSTON, QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA 4029
Australia0112Sir Charles Gairdner HREC Level 2, A block Hospital Avenue Nedlands, WA 6009
Australia0113Royal Perth Hospital HREC Colonial House Wellington Street, WA 6000
Australia0114Southern Health HREC 246 Clayton Road Clayton, Victoria 3168
Australia0115Sir Charles Gairdner HREC Level 2, A block Hospital Avenue Nedlands, WA 6009
Australia0117Cairns Base Hospital Ethics Committee PO Box 902 Cairns, QLD 4870
Australia0118Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout RoadNew Lambton Heights NSW 2305
Australia0119Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout RoadNew Lambton Heights NSW 2305
Australia0120Sir Charles Gairdner HREC Level 2, A block Hospital Avenue Nedlands, WA 6009
Austria0202Ethikkommission der Stadt Wien Town Thomas-Klestil-Platz 8/2 A-1030 Wien, Osterreich
Austria0203Ethikkommission der Stadt Wien Town Thomas-Klestil-Platz 8/2 A-1030 Wien, Osterreich
Austria0204Ethikkommission des Landes VorarlbergRathausstrassed 15A-6900 BregenzOsterreich
Austria0205Ethikkommission Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen Linz GmbH Fadingerstrasse 1A-4 Linz Osterreich
Austria0206Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Universitat Innsbruck Innrain 43A-6020 Innsbruck Osterreich
Austria0207EK des Landes Oberosterreich Landesnervenklinik Wagner-Jauregg Strasse Wagner-Jauregg Weg 15A-4020 Linz Osterreich
Belgium0301Secretariaat Ethische Commissie UZ Gent Attn. Prof. Dr Matthys De Pintelaan 1859000 Gent
Belgium0302H.-Hartziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen vzw Attn. Dr. Ludo Marcelis WILGENSTRAAT 28800 ROESELARE
Belgium0303Dr Van VlemOnze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Attn. Greet de Geest Moorselbaan 164 9300 Aalst
Belgium0304Commissie Medische Ethiek van Universitaire Ziekenhuizen K.U.Leuven Attn. Prof. Walter Van den BogaertCampus Gasthuisberg E330 Herestraat 49 B-3000 Leuven
Belgium0305Kristien Schoenmakers gang beheer en directie ZOL Campus St Jan Schiepse bos 6 3600 Genk
Belgium0306Hopitaux IRIS Sud-site Joseph Bracops Rue Dr Huet 79 Brussels 1070
Belgium0307Comité d’Ethique du Epicura Ath-Baudour Attn. Dr Frederic Debelle136 rue Louis Caty 7331 Baudour
Belgium0308Commission d’Ethique Biomédicale Hospitalo- Facultaire Attn. Pr Jean-Marie Maloteaux Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Avenue Hippocrate 55/14 B-1200 Bruxelles
Belgium0309Comite d’Ethique Hospitalo-Facultaire Universitaire de Liege Centre Hospitalier Universitaire du Sart Tilman, B35 4000 Sart Tilman par Liege 1
Belgium0311Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugman Attn. Valsamis JosephPlace A. Van Gehuchten, 4 1020 Bruxelles --2
Belgium0312Comite d’Ethique Clinique Universitaire de BruxellesHopital Erasme Route de Lennik 808 1070 Bruxelles - 7
Czech Republic0401Etická komise IKEM a FN Thomayerovy s poliklinikouVídeňská 800 140 59 Praha 4
Czech Republic0402Etická komise pro multicentrická hodnocení Fakultní nemocnice v Motole V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Praha 5
Czech Republic0403Etická komise Litomyšlská nemocnicea.s. J. E. Purkyně 652 570 14 Litomyšl
Czech Republic0404Etická komise Nemocnice Jihlava Vrchlického 59 586 01 Jihlava
Czech Republic0405Etická komise pro multicentrická hodnocení Fakultní nemocnice v Motole V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Praha 5
Czech Republic0406Etická komiseKrajská nemocnice T. Bati a.s. Zlín Havlíčkovo nábřeží 600 762 75 Zlín
Czech Republic0407Etická komise Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové Sokolská 581500 05 Hradec Králové
Czech Republic0408Etická Komise Nemocnice Písek, a.s. Karla Čapka 589 397 23 Písek
Czech Republic0409Etická komise Nemocnice Tábor, a.s. Kpt. Jaroše 2000 390 03 Tábor
Czech Republic0410Etická komiseNemocnice ve Frýdku-Místku, p.o. El. Krásnohorské 321 738 18 Frýdek-Místek
Czech Republic0411Etická komiseFN Brno Bohunice Jihlavská 20 625 00 Brno
Czech Republic0412Etická komise B. Braun Avitum Bulovka Budínova 67 181 02 Praha 8
Czech Republic0413Etická komise B. Braun Avitum Bulovka Budínova 67 181 02 Praha 8
Czech Republic0414Etická komise Nemocnice s poliklinikou v Novém Jičíně, p.o.K Nemocnici 775/76 741 01 Nový Jičín
Czech Republic0415Etická komise B. Braun Avitum Bulovka Budínova 67 181 02 Praha 8
Czech Republic0416Etická komise Nemocnice Znojmo MUDr. Jana Janského 11 669 02 Znojmo
Czech Republic0417Etická komise B. Braun Avitum Bulovka Budínova 67 181 02 Praha 8
Czech Republic0418Etická komise společnosti Fresenius Medical Care - DS, s.r.o.Lužná 591160 05 Praha 6
Czech Republic0419Etická komise pro multicentrická hodnocení Fakultní nemocnice v Motole V Úvalu 84150 06 Praha 5
Czech Republic0420Etická komise společnosti Fresenius Medical Care - DS, s.r.o.Lužná 591160 05 Praha 6
Czech Republic0421Etická komise společnosti Fresenius Medical Care - DS, s.r.o.Lužná 591160 05 Praha 6
Czech Republic0422Etická komise společnosti Fresenius Medical Care - DS, s.r.o.Lužná 591160 05 Praha 6
Czech Republic0423Etická komise společnosti Fresenius Medical Care - DS, s.r.o.Lužná 591160 05 Praha 6
Czech Republic0424Etická komise pro multicentrická hodnocení Fakultní nemocnice v Motole V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Praha 5
Denmark0501De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer for RegionHovedstadenRegionsgardenKongesn VaengeCK-3400 Hillerod
Denmark0502De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer for RegionHovedstadenRegionsgardenKongesn VaengeCK-3400 Hillerod
Denmark0503De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer for Region HovedstadenRegionsgården Kongens Vænge 2 DK-3400 Hillerød
Denmark0504De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer for RegionHovedstadenRegionsgardenKongesn VaengeCK-3400 Hillerod
France0601CPP Sud-Méditerranée IVDr Alain DUBOISHopital Saint EloiRue Bertin Sand34295 MontpellierCedex 5
France0601CPP Sud-Méditerranée IVDr Alain DUBOISHopital Saint EloiRue Bertin Sand34295 MontpellierCedex 5
France0602CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France0603CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France0604CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France0605CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France0606CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France0607CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France0608CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France0609CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France0610CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France0611CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France0612CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
Germany0701Ethik-Kommmission bei der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universitat Wurzburg Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie Versbacher Str. 997078 Wurzburg Wuerzburg
Germany0702Site 0702Ethik-Kommission der Arztekammer HamburgHumboldtstr. 67a 22083 Hamburg
Germany0703Site 0703Wthikkommission an der Medizinischen Fakultat Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universitat Greifswald Institut fur PharmakologieFriedrich-Loeffler-Str. 23d 17487 Greifswald
Germany0704Site 0704, 0721Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Nordrhein Tersteegenstr. 940474 Dusseldorf
Germany0705Site 0705, 0708, 0710, 0711Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der Medizinischen Fakultat der WWU-Munster Von-Esmarch-Strasse 6248149 Munster
Germany0706Site 0706Ethikkommission der Universitat Ulm Helmholtzstrasse 20(Oberer Eselsberg) 89081 Ulm
Germany0708Site 0705, 0708, 0710, 0711Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der Medizinischen Fakultat der WWU-Munster Von-Esmarch-Strasse 6248149 Munster
Germany0709Site 0709, 0729Ethik-Kommission der Landesarztekammer Hessen Im Vogelsang 360488 Frankfurt am Main
Germany0710Site 0705, 0708, 0710, 0711Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der Medizinischen Fakultat der WWU-Munster Von-Esmarch-Strasse 6248149 Munster
Germany0711Site 0705, 0708, 0710, 0711Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der Medizinischen Fakultat der WWU-Munster Von-Esmarch-Strasse 6248149 Munster
Germany0712Site 0712, 0726Ethik-Kommission der Bayerischen Landesarztekammer Muhlbaurstrasse 16 81677 Munchen
Germany0713Site 0713, 0725Landesamt fur Gesundheit und Soziales Geschaftsstelle der Ethik-Kommission des Landes Berlin Fehrbelliner Platz 110707 Berlin
Germany0714Site 0714, 0722Ethikkommission Landesarztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz Deutschhausplatz 3 55116 Mainz
Germany0715Site 0715Ethikkommission an der Med. Fakultat der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat BonnBiomedizinisches Zentrum Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25 53105 Bonn
Germany0716Site 0716Ethik-Kommission des Fachbereichs Medizin der Johann Wolfgang Goethe- Universitat Haus 1 Theodor-Stern-Kai 760590 Frankfurt
Germany0717Site 0717, 0730Ethik-Kommission bei der Landesarztekammer Baden-Wurttemberg Jahnstr. 40 70597 Stuttgart
Germany0719Site 0719Ethikkommission bei der Arztekammer Niedersachsen zur Beurteilung MedizinischerForschung am Menschen Berliner Allee 20 30175 Hannover
Germany0720Site 0720Ethikkommission bei der Sachsischen Landesarztekammer Schutzenhohe 1699 Dresden
Germany0721Site 0704, 0721Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Nordrhein Tersteegenstr. 940474 Dusseldorf
Germany0722Site 0714, 0722Ethikkommission Landesarztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz Deutschhausplatz 3 55116 Mainz
Germany0724Site 0724Ethik-Kommission der Otto-von-Guericke- Universitat an der Medizinischen Fakultat Leipziger Str. 44 39120 Magdeburg
Germany0725Site 0713, 0725Landesamt fur Gesundheit und Soziales Geschaftsstelle der Ethik-Kommission des Landes Berlin Fehrbelliner Platz 110707 Berlin
Germany0726Site 0712, 0726Ethik-Kommission der BayerischenLandesarztekammerMuhlbaurstrasse 1681677 Munchen
Germany0727Site 0727Ethik-Kommission der Universitat Witten/Herdecke Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 5058448 Witten
Germany0728Site 0728Ethikkommission der Med. Fakultat derUniversitat zu KolnGebaude 5Kerpener Str. 6250937 Koln
Germany0729Site 0709, 0729Ethik-Kommission der LandesarztekammerHessenIm Vogelsang 360488 Frankfurt am Main
Germany0730Site 0717, 0730Ethik-Kommission bei derLandesarztekammerBaden-WurttembergJahnstr. 4070597 Stuttgart
Germany0731Site 0731Ethik-Kommission der LandesarztekammerBrandenburgDreifertstrasse 1203044 Cottbus
Greece0801Ethical CommitteeGeneral University Hospital of Thessaloniki “Papgeorgiou” Thessaloniki Ring Road, Nea Efkarpia Thessaloniki, 56429
Greece0802General Hospital of Thessaloniki “Ippokrateion” 49 Konstantinoupoleos st. Thessaloniki, 56442
Greece0803ATTIKON General University Hospital of Athens 1 Rimini Str.Chaidari, Athens, 12462
Greece0804General University Hospital of Alexandroupolis Dragana Alexandroupolis, 68100
Greece0805Ethical CommiteeGeneral University Hospital of Larissa Mezourlo Larissa, 41110
Greece0806Ethics CommitteeAchillopoulio General Prefecture Hospital of Volos 134 Polyeri streetVolos, 38222
Greece0807Ethical CommiteeGeneral Hospital of Rhodes Aghioi Aphostoloi Rhodes, 85100
Greece0808Ethical CommiteeIPPOKRATEION General Hospital of Athens 114 Vas. Sofias Ave Athens, 11526
Greece0809Ethical CommiteeGeneral Hospital of Athens, KORGALENEIO- BENAKEIO Athenasaki Str. 1Athens, 11526
Greece0810Ethical CommiteeGeneral Prefecture Hospital of Ioannina, XATZIKOSTA Avv. Makrigianni 1Ioannina, 45550
Greece0811Ethical CommiteeGeneral University Hospital of Patras Rio-Patras Street Rios Patras, 16500
Greece0812Ethical CommiteeGeneral University Hospital of Ioannina Stavros Niarchos Avenue Ioannina, 45550
Greece0813Ethical Commitee General Hospital of ArtaA. Zara Str 4 Arta, 47100
Greece0815Ethical CommiteeGeneral Hospital of Peireus “Tzaneio” Zanni & Afendouli Peireus, 18536
Greece0817Ethical CommiteeGeneral Prefecture Hospital of Argos 191 Korinthou Str.Argos, 21200
Greece0818Ethical CommiteeLAIKO General Hospital of Athens 17 Aghiou Thomas Str.Athens, 11527
Greece0819Ethical CommiteeGeneral Hospital of Mytilene “Vostanio” 48 E. Vostani Str.Vestos, 81100
Greece0820Ethical Commitee General Hospital of Serres 2nd k of Serres-Drama National Road Serres, 62100
Greece0821Ethical CommiteeKYANOUS STAVROS General Hospital of Athens102, Vas Sofias Ave Athens, 11528
Greece0822Ethical CommiteeIASO General Hospital of Athens Cholargos Athens, 11526
Greece0823Ethical CommiteeGeneral Hospital of Athens “Henry Dunant” 107 Messogheion Ave Athens, 11526
Italy1001Comitato EticoDell’Azienda Ospedaliera di Lecco Via Dell’Eremo 9/11 Lecco, 23900
Italy1002Comitato Etico Locale per la Sperimentazione Clinical Della AUSL 12 di Viareggio Via Aurelia 33555045 Lido di Cà Maiore (LC)
Italy1003Comitato Etico Dell’Azeinda Ospedaliera Universitaria Della Seconda Univestità degli Studi di Napoli Via Costatinopoli, 10480138 Napoli
Italy1004Comitato Etico Indipendente dell’Azienda ospedaliero-Univesitaria Policlinico S. Orsola Via Albertoni 1540138 Bologna
Italy1005Comitato Etico Della ASL TO/2 di Torino Corso Svizzera 185 bis 10149 Torino
Italy1007Comitato di Bioetica della Azienda Ospedali Riuniti di Bergam Largo Barozzi 124128 Bergamo
Italy1008Comitato Etico ASL di Caserta Via Unità Italiana 28 81100 Caserta
Italy1009Comitato Etico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria ‘S. Martin’ di Genova Largo Rosanna Benzi 10 16132 Genova
Italy1Comitato Etico Della Provincia di Modena Via Largo del Pozzo 71 41124 Modena
Italy1011Comitato Etico ASL CE/1 Di Caserta Via Unità Italiana 28 81100 Caserta
Italy1012Comitato Etico Regionale Unico (CERU) AOU Santa Maria della Misericordia Piazzale Santa maria della Misericordia 15 33100 Udine
Italy1013Comitato Etico Scientifico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale S. Carlo Borromeo di MilanoVia Pio II° n° 3 20153 Milano
Italy1014Comitato Bioetico Dell’Azienda Cannizzaro di Catania Via Messina 82995126 Catania
Italy1016Comitato Ethico-Scientifico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Niguara Ca’ Granda Di Milano Piazza Ospedale Maggiore n. 3 20162 Milano
Italy1017Comitato Etico Della AUSL RM/H Di Albano LazialeBorgo Garibaldi n. 12 00041 Albano Laziale (RM)
Italy1018Comitato Etico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese-Ciaccio Di CatanzaroVia Vinicio Cortese, 10 88100 Catanzaro
Italy1020Comitato Etico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Giovanni Battista di Torino C so Bramante 88/90 10126 Torino
Italy1021Comitato Etico Scientifico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale S. Carlo Borrome di MilanoVia Pio II°, n°3 20153 Milano
Italy1022Comitato Etico Central Dell’IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri Di Pavia Via Salvatore Maugeri 4 27100 Pavia
Italy1023Comitato Etico Sperimentazione clinical Medicinali Della AUSL 8 Di Arezzo Via Curtatone 5452100 Arezzo
Italy1024Comitato EticoAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di figgiaViale Luigi Pinto 71100 Foggia
Italy1026Comitato di Etica Della ASL di Salerno Via Federico Ricco, 50 84014 Noceria Inferiore (SA)
Italy1027Comitato Etico Per le Sperimentazioni Cliniche die Medicinali Della Provincia di VeneziaVia Don Federico Tosatto 147 30174 Venezia
Italy1028Comitato Etico Della AUSL RM/G di Tivoli Via Tiburtina 22/a 00019 Tivoli (RM)
Italy1029Comitato Etico Delle Aziende Sanitarie Dell’Umbria di PerugiaVia della Rivoluzione 16 Ellera di Corciano (PG) 06070 Perugia
Netherlan ds1101Meander Medical Center, Lichtenberg location Toetsingscommissie Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekSecretariat, P&O Room N042 Utrechtseweg 1603818 ES Amersfoort The Netherlands
Netherlan ds1102Medical Ethics Review Committee Zuidwest Holland Fonteynenburghlaan 72275 CX VOORBURGThe Netherlands
Netherlan ds1102Medical Ethics Review Committee Gelre Hospital Albert Schweitzerlaan 317334 DZ Apeldoorn The Netherlands
Netherlan ds1103Medical Ethics Review Committee Gelre Hospital Albert Schweitzerlaan 317334 DZ Apeldoorn The Netherlands
Netherlan ds1104Medical Ethics Review Committee Albert Schweitzer Hospital loc. DW, Postvak 7, kmr. Z 150T.a.v. Ms. A. de Graag – de Vries Albert Schweitzerplaats 25 3318 AT Dordrecht The Netherlands
Netherlan ds1105METc VU Medical Center Medical Faculty, Room H-565 Van der Boerchorststraat 7 1081 BT Amsterdam The Netherlands
Netherlan ds1106Medical Ethics Review Committee Noord- HollandForeest Medical School Nassauplein 10 1815 GM Alkmaar The Netherlands
Norway1201Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK) REK-MidtBygg for samfunnsmedisin (5 etg) Håkon Jarlsgt. 11, St. Olavs Hospital Trondheim
Poland1301Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1302Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1303Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1306Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1309Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1311Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1313Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1314Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1315Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1316Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1318Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1320Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1321Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1322Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1323Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1324Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1326Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1327Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1328Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1329Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1330Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland1331Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Portugal1402CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Portugal1403CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Portugal1404CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Portugal1405CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Portugal1406CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Portugal1407CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Spain1501Hospital Universitario Dr Peset de Valencia CEIC, a/a Raquel E. Blesa, C/Juan de Garray 21, 1er Piso Consultas externas, 46017 Valencia
Spain1503Hospital Universitario Dr Peset de Valencia CEIC, a/a Raquel E. Blesa, C/Juan de Garray 21, 1er Piso Consultas externas, 46017 Valencia
Spain1504CEIC Hospital Universitario La Paz(LEC) Paseo de la Castellana, 261, Planta 8a Hospital General, 28046 Madrid
Spain1505CEIC Fundació Puigvert IUNA (LEC) Agencia de Gestio del Coneixement Cartagena, 340-350 08025 Barcelona
Spain1506CEIC Hospital Universitario General Gregorio Marañón (CEC) CEIC Area 1, C/ dr Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid
Spain1507Agencia de Ensayos Clinicos - servicio de Farmacia Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, c/ Villarroel, 170 - Sotano, Escalera 6b, 08036 Barcelona
Spain1509CEIC Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge Edificio Consultas Externas. Planta -1, C/ Feixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona
Spain1510CEIC Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Edifici Institut de Recerca, 2a planta Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035
Spain1512CEIC Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón (LEC) C/ Budapest N1, 28922 Alcorcon, Madrid
Spain1513CEIC Clinica de AsturiasHospital Central de Asturias, Celestino Villamil, s/n, 33006 Oviedo
Spain1514Hopsital Universitario “Reina Sofia” Comite Etico de Ensayos Clinicos, Edificio de Consultas Externas, planta -1, Avda. Menendez Pidal, s/n, 14004 Cordoba
Spain1515Hospital Torrecardenas CEICParaje Torrecardenas, s/n, 04009 Almeria
Spain1516Fundacion Jimenez Diaz CEIC, Avda. Reyes Catolicos, 2, Entrplanta, 28040 Madrid
Spain1517Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias CEIC, Ctra. Alcala-Meco s/n, 28805 Alcala de Henares, Madrid
Spain1518CEIC de Aragon, Avda. Gomez Laguna, 25 planta 11, 50009 Zaragoza
Spain1519Hospital Universitario de Puerto Real, Ctra. NaI IV, km. 665, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz
Spain1520CEIC Hospital Universitario de Getafe (LEC) Ctra. De Toledo, km. 12500, 28905 Getafe, Madrid
Spain1521CEIC Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Findacion para la Investigacion Biomedica, C/ Diego de leon, 62, 28006 Madrid
Spain1522CEIC Hospital Universitario de Girona Josep Trueta (LEC) avda. De Franca s/n, 17007 Girona
Spain1523CEIC Parc Salut del Mar (LEC)IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Parc de Recerca Biomedica de Barcelona, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona
Sweden1601Regionala etikprövningsnämndenStockholm FE 289Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, 17179
Sweden1602Regionala etikprövningsnämndenStockholm FE 289Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, 17179
Sweden1603Regionala etikprövningsnämndenStockholm FE 289Karolinska InstitutetStockholm, 17179
Switzerland1701Kantonal Ethikkommission Aargau Departement Gesundheit und Soziales PD Dr. med. Otto Hilfiker Bachstrasse 155001 Aarau
Switzerlan d1702Kantonal Ethik-Kommission (KEK) Prof. Dr. med. Robert Maurer Universitätsspital Zürich Sonneggstr. 12 8091 Zürich
Switzerlan d1703Kantonal Ethik-Kommission (KEK) Prof. Dr. med. Robert Maurer Universitätsspital Zürich Sonneggstr. 12 8091 Zürich
Switzerlan d1704Kantonal Ethikkommission Bern (KEK) Prof. Dr. pharm. Nilaus Tüller Postfach 56 3 Bern
Turkey1801Ankara University Medical Faculty Deanship Clinical Researches Ethics Committee nkara Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Morfoloji Binası 06100 Sihhiye Ankara Turkey
Turkey1802Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey1803Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey1804Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey1804Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey1807Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey1810Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey1811Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
United Kingdom1901Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1902Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1903Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1904Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1905Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1906Health Research AuthorityNRES Committee Riverside RECBristol REC CentreWhitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom1907Health Research AuthorityNRES Committee Riverside RECBristol REC CentreWhitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom1908Health Research AuthorityNRES Committee Riverside RECBristol REC CentreWhitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom1909Health Research AuthorityNRES Committee Riverside RECBristol REC CentreWhitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom1910Health Research AuthorityNRES Committee Riverside RECBristol REC CentreWhitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom1911Health Research AuthorityNRES Committee Riverside RECBristol REC CentreWhitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom1912Health Research AuthorityNRES Committee Riverside RECBristol REC CentreWhitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom1913Health Research AuthorityNRES Committee Riverside RECBristol REC CentreWhitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom1914Health Research AuthorityNRES Committee Riverside RECBristol REC CentreWhitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom1915Health Research AuthorityNRES Committee Riverside RECBristol REC CentreWhitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom1916Health Research AuthorityNRES Committee Riverside RECBristol REC CentreWhitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom1917Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1918Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1919Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1920Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1921Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1922Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1923Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1924Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1925Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1926Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1927Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1928Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1929Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom19230Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1931Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1932Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom1933Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC CentreLevel 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
Romania2001National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania2002National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania2003National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania2004National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania2005National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania2006National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania2007National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
US2110Salem VA Medical Center IRB Kim Ragsdale, PhD 1970 Roanoke BlvdSalem. VA 24153
US2113Integreview IRB Valerie Nelson3001, South Lamar Blvd Suite 210 Austin, TX 78704
US2105Integreview IRB Valerie Nelson3001, South Lamar Blvd Suite 210 Austin, TX 78704
US2114Temple VA Medical Cener IRB John W Klocek, PhD 1901 Veterans Memorial Drive Temple, TX 76504
  30 in total

1.  Parenteral iron formulations differentially affect MCP-1, HO-1, and NGAL gene expression and renal responses to injury.

Authors:  Ali C M Johnson; Kirsten Becker; Richard A Zager
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2010-05-26

2.  Proteinuria induced by parenteral iron in chronic kidney disease--a comparative randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; David J Leehey; Scott M Olsen; Naomi V Dahl
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Maintenance of elevated versus physiological iron indices in non-anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lawrence P McMahon; Annette B Kent; Peter G Kerr; Helen Healy; Ashley B Irish; Bruce Cooper; Adrian Kark; Simon D Roger
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Changing patterns of anemia management in US hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Janet K Freburger; Leslie J Ng; Brian D Bradbury; Abhijit V Kshirsagar; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Comparison of intravenous iron sucrose to oral iron in the treatment of anemic patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis.

Authors:  Chaim Charytan; Wajeh Qunibi; George R Bailie
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2005-04-11

6.  Erythropoietic response and outcomes in kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Scott D Solomon; Hajime Uno; Eldrin F Lewis; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Julie Lin; Emmanuel A Burdmann; Dick de Zeeuw; Peter Ivanovich; Andrew S Levey; Patrick Parfrey; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Ajay K Singh; Robert Toto; Fannie Huang; Jerome Rossert; John J V McMurray; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  A S Levey; J P Bosch; J B Lewis; T Greene; N Rogers; D Roth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A randomized controlled study of iron supplementation in patients treated with erythropoietin.

Authors:  I C Macdougall; B Tucker; J Thompson; C R Tomson; L R Baker; A E Raine
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Ferumoxytol for treating iron deficiency anemia in CKD.

Authors:  Bruce S Spinowitz; Annamaria T Kausz; Jovanna Baptista; Sylvia D Noble; Renuka Sothinathan; Marializa V Bernardo; Louis Brenner; Brian J G Pereira
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  On the nature of proteinuria with acute renal injury in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2004-10-05
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Ferric Carboxymaltose: A Review in Iron Deficiency.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Iron Deficiency in Chronic Kidney Disease: Updates on Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Authors:  Elizabeth Katherine Batchelor; Pinelopi Kapitsinou; Pablo E Pergola; Csaba P Kovesdy; Diana I Jalal
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Parenteral versus oral iron therapy for adults and children with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Emma L O'Lone; Elisabeth M Hodson; Ionut Nistor; Davide Bolignano; Angela C Webster; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-21

Review 4.  Simultaneous management of disordered phosphate and iron homeostasis to correct fibroblast growth factor 23 and associated outcomes in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Guillaume Courbon; Marta Martinez-Calle; Valentin David
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Iron deficiency across chronic kidney disease stages: Is there a reverse gender pattern?

Authors:  Mabel Aoun; Rita Karam; Ghassan Sleilaty; Leony Antoun; Walid Ammar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Intravenous Irons: From Basic Science to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Sunil Bhandari; Dora I A Pereira; Helen F Chappell; Hal Drakesmith
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.