BACKGROUND: Few studies compare oral to intravenous (IV) iron for managing anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis. METHODS: We enrolled 96 CKD anemic patients onerythropoietin in a randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled study. Patients received 29 days of oral FeSO4 (325 mg t.i.d.) or intravenous (IV) iron sucrose (5 doses of 200 mg weekly). Assessments were made up to 14 days after the last dose. Primary endpoints were changes in hemoglobin and ferritin, and clinical success was evaluated from the percent of patients with combined endpoints of rises in hemoglobin/ferritin, hemoglobin/ferritin/TSAT, and hemoglobin/TSAT. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in hemoglobin values between IV and oral therapy. IV iron patients had greater increases in mean serum ferritin (288 ng/ml, p < 0.0001) compared to oral iron patients (-5.1 ng/ml, p = NS). IV iron patients with baseline ferritin < 100 ng/ml had a greater increase in hemoglobin (1.4 g/dl) compared to oral iron patients (0.9 g/dl) (p < 0.05). More IV iron patients (54.2%) attained hemoglobin values > 11.0 g/dl compared to oral iron patients (31.3%, p = 0.028), and met hemoglobin/ferritin (62.5%), hemoglobin/TSAT (47.9%), hemoglobin/ferritin/TSAT (43.8%), and ferritin/TSAT criteria (54.2%) than oral iron patients (0, 22.9, 0, and 0%, respectively). There were no serious side effects. CONCLUSIONS: These CKD patients had increases in both hemoglobin and ferritin following IV iron therapy, whereas those treated with oral iron had increases in hemoglobin without increases in iron stores. Iron sucrose, given weekly as 200 mg IV push over 5 min is an effective and safe anemia treatment in this population.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Few studies compare oral to intravenous (IV) iron for managing anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) not on dialysis. METHODS: We enrolled 96 CKD anemicpatients on erythropoietin in a randomized, open-label, multicenter, controlled study. Patients received 29 days of oral FeSO4 (325 mg t.i.d.) or intravenous (IV) iron sucrose (5 doses of 200 mg weekly). Assessments were made up to 14 days after the last dose. Primary endpoints were changes in hemoglobin and ferritin, and clinical success was evaluated from the percent of patients with combined endpoints of rises in hemoglobin/ferritin, hemoglobin/ferritin/TSAT, and hemoglobin/TSAT. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in hemoglobin values between IV and oral therapy. IV ironpatients had greater increases in mean serum ferritin (288 ng/ml, p < 0.0001) compared to oral ironpatients (-5.1 ng/ml, p = NS). IV ironpatients with baseline ferritin < 100 ng/ml had a greater increase in hemoglobin (1.4 g/dl) compared to oral ironpatients (0.9 g/dl) (p < 0.05). More IV ironpatients (54.2%) attained hemoglobin values > 11.0 g/dl compared to oral ironpatients (31.3%, p = 0.028), and met hemoglobin/ferritin (62.5%), hemoglobin/TSAT (47.9%), hemoglobin/ferritin/TSAT (43.8%), and ferritin/TSAT criteria (54.2%) than oral ironpatients (0, 22.9, 0, and 0%, respectively). There were no serious side effects. CONCLUSIONS: These CKDpatients had increases in both hemoglobin and ferritin following IV iron therapy, whereas those treated with oral iron had increases in hemoglobin without increases in iron stores. Iron sucrose, given weekly as 200 mg IV push over 5 min is an effective and safe anemia treatment in this population.
Authors: Paolo Ferrari; Hemant Kulkarni; Shyam Dheda; Susanne Betti; Colin Harrison; Timothy G St Pierre; John K Olynyk Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-09-28 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Adeera Levin; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Bruce Culleton; Sheldon Tobe; Philip McFarlane; Marcel Ruzicka; Kevin Burns; Braden Manns; Colin White; Francoise Madore; Louise Moist; Scott Klarenbach; Brendan Barrett; Robert Foley; Kailash Jindal; Peter Senior; Neesh Pannu; Sabin Shurraw; Ayub Akbari; Adam Cohn; Martina Reslerova; Vinay Deved; David Mendelssohn; Gihad Nesrallah; Joanne Kappel; Marcello Tonelli Journal: CMAJ Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Donald S Silverberg; Dov Wexler; Adrian Iaina; Shoshana Steinbruch; Y Wollman; Doron Schwartz Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: A Rosati; C Tetta; J I Merello; I Palomares; R Perez-Garcia; F Maduell; B Canaud; P Aljama Garcia Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Bruce S Spinowitz; Annamaria T Kausz; Jovanna Baptista; Sylvia D Noble; Renuka Sothinathan; Marializa V Bernardo; Louis Brenner; Brian J G Pereira Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-06-04 Impact factor: 10.121