Literature DB >> 8914038

A randomized controlled study of iron supplementation in patients treated with erythropoietin.

I C Macdougall1, B Tucker, J Thompson, C R Tomson, L R Baker, A E Raine.   

Abstract

In view of current uncertainty regarding the optimum route for iron supplementation in patients receiving recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO), a prospective randomized controlled study was designed to investigate this issue. All iron-replete renal failure patients commencing EPO who had a hemoglobin concentration < 8.5 g/dl and an initial serum ferritin level of 100 to 800 micrograms/liter were randomized into three groups with different iron supplementation: Group 1, i.v. iron dextran 5 ml every 2 weeks; Group 2, oral ferrous sulphate 200 mg tds; Group 3, no iron. All patients were treated with 25 U/kg of EPO thrice weekly subcutaneously. The hemoglobin concentration, reticulocyte count, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation, and EPO dose were monitored every two weeks for the first four months. Thirty-seven patients entered the study (12 i.v., 13 oral, 12 no iron). The three groups were equivalent with regard to age, sex, and other demographic details. Even allowing for dosage adjustments, the hemoglobin response in the group receiving i.v. iron (7.3 +/- 0.8 to 11.9 +/- 1.2 g/dl) was significantly greater than that for the other two groups (7.2 +/- 1.1 to 10.2 +/- 1.4 g/dl and 7.3 +/- 0.8 to 9.9 +/- 1.6 g/dl for Groups 2 and 3, respectively; P < 0.005 for both groups vs. Group 1 at 16 weeks). There was no difference between the groups supplemented with oral iron and no iron. Serum ferritin levels remained constant in those receiving i.v. iron (345 +/- 273 to 359 +/- 140 micrograms/liter), in contrast to the other two groups in which ferritin levels fell significantly (309 +/- 218 to 116 +/- 87 micrograms/liter and 458 +/- 206 to 131 +/- 121 micrograms/liter for Groups 2 and 3, respectively; P < 0.0005 for Group 1 vs. Group 2, and P < 0.005 for Group 1 vs. Group 3 at 16 weeks). Dosage requirements of EPO were less in Group 1 (1202 +/- 229 U/kg/16 weeks) than in Group 2 (1294 +/- 314 U/kg/16 weeks) or Group 3 (1475 +/- 311 U/kg/16 weeks; P < 0.05 vs. Group 1). The results of this study suggest that, even in iron-replete patients, those supplemented with i.v. iron have an enhanced hemoglobin response to EPO with better maintenance of iron stores and lower dosage requirements of EPO, compared with those patients receiving oral iron and no iron supplementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8914038     DOI: 10.1038/ki.1996.487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  65 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the hepcidin-ferroportin axis to develop new treatment strategies for anemia of chronic disease and anemia of inflammation.

Authors:  Chia Chi Sun; Valentina Vaja; Jodie L Babitt; Herbert Y Lin
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 10.047

2.  Supplemental iron via dialysate: a novel mode of delivery for hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Iain C Macdougall
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Effects of Ferric Citrate in Patients with Nondialysis-Dependent CKD and Iron Deficiency Anemia.

Authors:  Steven Fishbane; Geoffrey A Block; Lisa Loram; John Neylan; Pablo E Pergola; Katrin Uhlig; Glenn M Chertow
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Serum iron markers are inadequate for guiding iron repletion in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Paolo Ferrari; Hemant Kulkarni; Shyam Dheda; Susanne Betti; Colin Harrison; Timothy G St Pierre; John K Olynyk
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  [The use of erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins in anemic patients with malignant diseases].

Authors:  Heinz Ludwig; Thomas Auberger; Otto Ch Burghuber; Michael Gnant; Georg Hopfinger; Ulrich Jäger; Felix Keil; Gabriela Kornek; Werner Linkesch; Edgar Petru; Robert Pirker; Elisabeth Pittermann; Alexander Reinthaller; Hellmut Samonigg; Günther Steger; Felix Stockenhuber; Michael Studnicka; Günter Weiss; Christoph Zielinski
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Ferric citrate controls phosphorus and delivers iron in patients on dialysis.

Authors:  Julia B Lewis; Mohammed Sika; Mark J Koury; Peale Chuang; Gerald Schulman; Mark T Smith; Frederick C Whittier; Douglas R Linfert; Claude M Galphin; Balaji P Athreya; A Kaldun Kaldun Nossuli; Ingrid J Chang; Samuel S Blumenthal; John Manley; Steven Zeig; Kotagal S Kant; Juan Jose Olivero; Tom Greene; Jamie P Dwyer
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 7.  Clinical Translation of Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Yuanzeng Min; Joseph M Caster; Michael J Eblan; Andrew Z Wang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Ferumoxytol as an intravenous iron replacement therapy in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Robert Provenzano; Brigitte Schiller; Madhumathi Rao; Daniel Coyne; Louis Brenner; Brian J G Pereira
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Cumulative iron dose and resistance to erythropoietin.

Authors:  A Rosati; C Tetta; J I Merello; I Palomares; R Perez-Garcia; F Maduell; B Canaud; P Aljama Garcia
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.902

10.  A study of the response of elderly patients with end-stage renal disease to epoetin alfa or beta.

Authors:  Johann C B Nicholas
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.