Nada Murphy1, Amy Epstein, Helen Leonard, Elise Davis, Dinah Reddihough, Andrew Whitehouse, Peter Jacoby, Jenny Bourke, Katrina Williams, Jenny Downs. 1. *Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; †The Jack Brockhoff Child Health and Wellbeing Program, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; ‡Department of Developmental Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; §School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There are many challenges to health, functioning, and participation for children with Down syndrome; yet, the quality-of-life (QOL) domains important for this group have never been clearly articulated. This study investigated parental observations to identify QOL domains in children with Down syndrome and determined whether domains differed between children and adolescents. METHODS: The sample comprised 17 families whose child with Down syndrome was aged 6 to 18 years. Primary caregivers took part in semistructured telephone interviews to explore aspects of their child's life that were satisfying or challenging. Qualitative thematic analysis was implemented using a grounded theory framework to identify domains. The coded data set was divided into 2 groups (childhood and adolescence) at 3 age cut points to observe whether differences existed between the coded domains and domain elements: (1) 6 to 11 years with 12 to 18 years; (2) 6 to 13 years with 14 to 18 years; and (3) 6 to 15 years with 16 to 18 years. RESULTS: Eleven domains were identified: physical health, behavior and emotion, personal value, communication, movement and physical activity, routines and predictability, independence and autonomy, social connectedness and relationships, variety of activities, nature and outdoors, and access to services. No differences in domains and domain elements were identified across childhood and adolescence. CONCLUSION: Our data form a preliminary framework from which to design investigations of the child's perspectives on life quality and suggest a range of necessary supports and services.
OBJECTIVE: There are many challenges to health, functioning, and participation for children with Down syndrome; yet, the quality-of-life (QOL) domains important for this group have never been clearly articulated. This study investigated parental observations to identify QOL domains in children with Down syndrome and determined whether domains differed between children and adolescents. METHODS: The sample comprised 17 families whose child with Down syndrome was aged 6 to 18 years. Primary caregivers took part in semistructured telephone interviews to explore aspects of their child's life that were satisfying or challenging. Qualitative thematic analysis was implemented using a grounded theory framework to identify domains. The coded data set was divided into 2 groups (childhood and adolescence) at 3 age cut points to observe whether differences existed between the coded domains and domain elements: (1) 6 to 11 years with 12 to 18 years; (2) 6 to 13 years with 14 to 18 years; and (3) 6 to 15 years with 16 to 18 years. RESULTS: Eleven domains were identified: physical health, behavior and emotion, personal value, communication, movement and physical activity, routines and predictability, independence and autonomy, social connectedness and relationships, variety of activities, nature and outdoors, and access to services. No differences in domains and domain elements were identified across childhood and adolescence. CONCLUSION: Our data form a preliminary framework from which to design investigations of the child's perspectives on life quality and suggest a range of necessary supports and services.
Authors: Susan M Sawyer; Rima A Afifi; Linda H Bearinger; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Bruce Dick; Alex C Ezeh; George C Patton Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Helma B M van Gameren-Oosterom; Minne Fekkes; Jacobus P van Wouwe; Symone B Detmar; Anne Marie Oudesluys-Murphy; Paul H Verkerk Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Elise Davis; Amy Shelly; Elizabeth Waters; Andrew Mackinnon; Dinah Reddihough; Roslyn Boyd; H Kerr Graham Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2009-01-26 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Helma B M van Gameren-Oosterom; Minne Fekkes; Simone E Buitendijk; Ashna D Mohangoo; Jeanet Bruil; Jacobus P Van Wouwe Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jenny Downs; Peter Jacoby; Helen Leonard; Amy Epstein; Nada Murphy; Elise Davis; Dinah Reddihough; Andrew Whitehouse; Katrina Williams Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Peter Jacoby; Andrew Whitehouse; Helen Leonard; Jacinta Saldaris; Scott Demarest; Tim Benke; Jenny Downs Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 2.988