OBJECTIVE: To assess problem behavior in adolescents with Down syndrome and examine the association with sex and severity of intellectual disability. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional data of a Dutch nationwide cohort of Down syndrome children aged 16-19 years were collected using a written parental questionnaire. Problem behavior was measured using the Child Behavior Checklist and compared with normative data. The degree of intellectual disability was determined using the Dutch Social competence rating scale. RESULTS: The response rate was 62.8% (322/513), and the mean age 18.3 years (SD ± 0.8). The total score for problem behavior was higher in adolescents with Down syndrome than in adolescents without Down syndrome (26.8 vs 16.5; P < .001). Overall, 51% of adolescents with Down syndrome had problem scores in the clinical or borderline range on 1 or more Child Behavior Checklist subscales; this is more than twice as high as adolescents without Down syndrome. Adolescents with Down syndrome had more internalizing problems than their counterparts without Down syndrome (14% and 9%, respectively, in the clinical range); the percentages for externalizing problems were almost equal (7% and 9%, respectively, in the clinical range). The highest problem scores in adolescents with Down syndrome were observed on the social problems and thought problems subscales (large to very large standardized differences). Male sex and/or more severe mental disabilities were associated with more behavioral problems. CONCLUSIONS: Serious problem behavior is more prevalent in adolescents with Down syndrome. This demonstrates the need for a focus on general behavior improvement and on the detection and treatment of specific psychopathology in individuals with Down syndrome.
OBJECTIVE: To assess problem behavior in adolescents with Down syndrome and examine the association with sex and severity of intellectual disability. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional data of a Dutch nationwide cohort of Down syndrome children aged 16-19 years were collected using a written parental questionnaire. Problem behavior was measured using the Child Behavior Checklist and compared with normative data. The degree of intellectual disability was determined using the Dutch Social competence rating scale. RESULTS: The response rate was 62.8% (322/513), and the mean age 18.3 years (SD ± 0.8). The total score for problem behavior was higher in adolescents with Down syndrome than in adolescents without Down syndrome (26.8 vs 16.5; P < .001). Overall, 51% of adolescents with Down syndrome had problem scores in the clinical or borderline range on 1 or more Child Behavior Checklist subscales; this is more than twice as high as adolescents without Down syndrome. Adolescents with Down syndrome had more internalizing problems than their counterparts without Down syndrome (14% and 9%, respectively, in the clinical range); the percentages for externalizing problems were almost equal (7% and 9%, respectively, in the clinical range). The highest problem scores in adolescents with Down syndrome were observed on the social problems and thought problems subscales (large to very large standardized differences). Male sex and/or more severe mental disabilities were associated with more behavioral problems. CONCLUSIONS: Serious problem behavior is more prevalent in adolescents with Down syndrome. This demonstrates the need for a focus on general behavior improvement and on the detection and treatment of specific psychopathology in individuals with Down syndrome.
Authors: Megan Stringer; Irushi Abeysekera; Jared Thomas; Jonathan LaCombe; Kailey Stancombe; Robert J Stewart; Karl J Dria; Joseph M Wallace; Charles R Goodlett; Randall J Roper Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2017-05-03
Authors: Angela C Summers; Joseph Snow; Edythe Wiggs; Alexander G Liu; Camilo Toro; Andrea Poretti; Wadih M Zein; Brian P Brooks; Melissa A Parisi; Sara Inati; Dan Doherty; Meghana Vemulapalli; Jim C Mullikin; Thierry Vilboux; William A Gahl; Meral Gunay-Aygun Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Kitty-Rose Foley; Jenny Bourke; Stewart L Einfeld; Bruce J Tonge; Peter Jacoby; Helen Leonard Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Jacobus P van Wouwe; Helma B M van Gameren-Oosterom; Paul H Verkerk; Paula van Dommelen; Minne Fekkes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 3.240