Jacques A Pralong1,2, Andre Cartier3. 1. Institute for Work and Health, Route de la Corniche 2, 1066, Epalinges, Switzerland. 2. Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland. 3. Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, 5400 Boulevard Gouin Ouest, Montréal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada. andre.cartier@umontreal.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Occupational asthma (OA) is one of the most frequent occupational diseases and its diagnosis is often difficult. This review summarizes its current diagnostic challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: OA is associated with significant health and socio-economic burden. It is underdiagnosed and physicians need to adopt a stepwise approach to confirm the diagnosis. Although early removal from exposure to the offending agent is associated with a better prognosis, physicians should try to confirm the diagnosis of work-related asthma before taking a worker off work. A proper occupational and medical history is very important but is not enough to make the diagnosis of OA. Objective evidence of work-related asthma is required and this represents a serious challenge to most physicians. Measurement of non-specific bronchial responsiveness (NSBR) and spirometry may confirm the diagnosis of asthma but do not confirm the diagnosis of OA. Serial monitoring of peak expiratory flows (PEF), NSBR, and airway inflammation at and off work may confirm the diagnosis of OA but are often difficult to perform. Confirming sensitization by skin prick tests or specific IgE may help to support the diagnosis of OA. Specific inhalation challenges (SIC) in the lab or at work are considered the reference standard but are of limited access. Medical surveillance programs along with primary prevention (reducing exposure) may help to reduce the burden of OA, but the ideal program has yet to be defined. The diagnostic workup of OA remains a challenge and needs a rigorous stepwise evaluation.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Occupational asthma (OA) is one of the most frequent occupational diseases and its diagnosis is often difficult. This review summarizes its current diagnostic challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: OA is associated with significant health and socio-economic burden. It is underdiagnosed and physicians need to adopt a stepwise approach to confirm the diagnosis. Although early removal from exposure to the offending agent is associated with a better prognosis, physicians should try to confirm the diagnosis of work-related asthma before taking a worker off work. A proper occupational and medical history is very important but is not enough to make the diagnosis of OA. Objective evidence of work-related asthma is required and this represents a serious challenge to most physicians. Measurement of non-specific bronchial responsiveness (NSBR) and spirometry may confirm the diagnosis of asthma but do not confirm the diagnosis of OA. Serial monitoring of peak expiratory flows (PEF), NSBR, and airway inflammation at and off work may confirm the diagnosis of OA but are often difficult to perform. Confirming sensitization by skin prick tests or specific IgE may help to support the diagnosis of OA. Specific inhalation challenges (SIC) in the lab or at work are considered the reference standard but are of limited access. Medical surveillance programs along with primary prevention (reducing exposure) may help to reduce the burden of OA, but the ideal program has yet to be defined. The diagnostic workup of OA remains a challenge and needs a rigorous stepwise evaluation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Monitoring; Occupational asthma; Peak expiratory flow; Specific inhalation challenges
Authors: D R Baldwin; P Gannon; P Bright; D T Newton; A Robertson; K Venables; B Graneek; R D Barker; A Cartier; J-L Malo; M Wilsher; C F A Pantin; P S Burge Journal: Thorax Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Frédéric Girard; Simone Chaboillez; André Cartier; Johanne Côté; Frederick E Hargreave; Manon Labrecque; Jean-Luc Malo; Susan M Tarlo; Catherine Lemière Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-07-21 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Rolf Merget; Ingrid Sander; Vera van Kampen; Monika Raulf-Heimsoth; Olaf Hagemeyer; Eike Marek; Thomas Brüning Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2015 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Jacques A Pralong; Gregory Moullec; Eva Suarthana; Michel Gérin; Denyse Gautrin; Jocelyne Lʼ Archevêque; Manon Labrecque Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: D Talini; F Novelli; E Bacci; F L Dente; M De Santis; A Di Franco; L Melosini; B Vagaggini; P L Paggiaro Journal: J Allergy (Cairo) Date: 2011-05-25
Authors: Julia Engel; Vera van Kampen; Anne Lotz; Jessica Abramowski; Vitali Gering; Olaf Hagemeyer; Thomas Brüning; Monika Raulf; Rolf Merget Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Lavinia Clara Del Roio; Rafael Futoshi Mizutani; Regina Carvalho Pinto; Mário Terra-Filho; Ubiratan Paula Santos Journal: J Bras Pneumol Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 2.624