Literature DB >> 15271693

An effective strategy for diagnosing occupational asthma: use of induced sputum.

Frédéric Girard1, Simone Chaboillez, André Cartier, Johanne Côté, Frederick E Hargreave, Manon Labrecque, Jean-Luc Malo, Susan M Tarlo, Catherine Lemière.   

Abstract

Monitoring airway inflammation by means of induced sputum cell counts seems to improve the management of asthma. We sought to assess whether such monitoring at the end of periods at and away from work combined with the monitoring of PEF could improve the diagnosis of occupational asthma. We enrolled subjects suspected of having occupational asthma. Serial monitoring of PEF was performed during 2 weeks at and away from work. At the end of each period, induced sputum was collected. Specific inhalation challenge was subsequently performed. PEF graphs were interpreted visually by five independent observers. Forty-nine subjects, including 23 with positive specific inhalation challenge, completed the study. The addition of sputum cell counts to the monitoring of PEF increased the specificity of this test, respectively, by 18 (range [r] 13.7-25.5) or 26.8% (r 24.8-30.4) depending if an increase of sputum eosinophils greater than 1 or 2% when at work was considered as significant. The sensitivity increased by 8.2% (r 4.1-13.4) or decreased by 12.3% (r 3.1-24.1) depending on the cutoff value in sputum eosinophils chosen (greater than 1 or 2%, respectively). The addition of sputum cell counts to PEF monitoring is useful to improve the diagnosis of occupational asthma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15271693     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200403-380OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  15 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of occupational asthma: an update.

Authors:  Edgardo J Jares; Carlos E Baena-Cagnani; R Maximiliano Gómez
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Defining occupational asthma and confirming the diagnosis: what do experts suggest?

Authors:  Jean-Luc Malo; Anthony Newman Taylor
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Asthma in the workplace: a Canadian contribution and perspective.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Malo; Moira Chan-Yeung
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 4.  Economic evaluations.

Authors:  Nick R Anthonisen
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.409

5.  A kit to facilitate and standardize the processing of sputum for measurement of airway inflammation.

Authors:  Simone Chaboillez; Angira Dasgupta; Philippe Prince; Louis-Philippe Boulet; Catherine Lemière
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 6.  Diagnosis of asthma in adults.

Authors:  Alan G Kaplan; Meyer S Balter; Alan D Bell; Harold Kim; R Andrew McIvor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Assessing and treating work-related asthma.

Authors:  Tracy Stoughton; Michael Prematta; Timothy Craig
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 3.406

Review 8.  Review of Diagnostic Challenges in Occupational Asthma.

Authors:  Jacques A Pralong; Andre Cartier
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.806

9.  Cost-effectiveness of various diagnostic approaches for occupational asthma.

Authors:  Wendy A Kennedy; Frédéric Girard; Simone Chaboillez; André Cartier; Johanne Côté; Frederick Hargreave; Manon Labrecque; Jean-Luc Malo; Susan M Tarlo; Carrie A Redlich; Catherine Lemière
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.409

10.  Asthma related to cleaning agents: a clinical insight.

Authors:  Olivier Vandenplas; Vinciane D'Alpaos; Geneviève Evrard; Jacques Jamart; Joel Thimpont; François Huaux; Jean-Christophe Renauld
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.