Literature DB >> 23618886

Screening for occupational asthma by using a self-administered questionnaire in a clinical setting.

Jacques A Pralong1, Gregory Moullec, Eva Suarthana, Michel Gérin, Denyse Gautrin, Jocelyne Lʼ Archevêque, Manon Labrecque.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Because of its high prevalence, early screening for occupational asthma (OA) is crucial. We aimed to evaluate the screening performance of the Occupational Asthma Screening Questionnaire-11 items (OASQ-11) in a clinical setting.
METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2011, 169 workers referred for potential OA to our hospital completed the OASQ-11 and underwent workups to determine the final diagnosis. The discriminative abilities of the OASQ-11 as a whole and in relation to demographic and exposure parameters were determined by the area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUC).
RESULTS: Model 1, consisting of the OASQ's items, showed fair discrimination (AUC, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.80). Addition of age and exposure duration to model 1 improved discrimination (AUC, 0.80; confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.88).
CONCLUSION: A simple model consisting of the OASQ-11's items, age, and exposure duration could well discriminate subjects with OA in a clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23618886     DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182851790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  7 in total

1.  An official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report: presentations and discussion of the fifth Jack Pepys Workshop on Asthma in the Workplace. Comparisons between asthma in the workplace and non-work-related asthma.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Malo; Susan M Tarlo; Joaquin Sastre; James Martin; Mohamed F Jeebhay; Nicole Le Moual; Dick Heederik; Thomas Platts-Mills; Paul D Blanc; Olivier Vandenplas; Gianna Moscato; Frédéric de Blay; André Cartier
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-07

Review 2.  Review of Diagnostic Challenges in Occupational Asthma.

Authors:  Jacques A Pralong; Andre Cartier
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 3.  Improving detection of work-related asthma: a review of gaps in awareness, reporting and knowledge translation.

Authors:  Madison MacKinnon; Teresa To; Clare Ramsey; Catherine Lemière; M Diane Lougheed
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.406

Review 4.  Recommendations for a Clinical Decision Support System for Work-Related Asthma in Primary Care Settings.

Authors:  Philip Harber; Carrie A Redlich; Stella Hines; Margaret S Filios; Eileen Storey
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  Assessment of work-related asthma prevalence, control and severity: protocol of a field study.

Authors:  Hermine Mével; Valérie Demange; Emmanuelle Penven; Christian Trontin; Pascal Wild; Christophe Paris
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Screening tools for work-related asthma and their diagnostic accuracy: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Ngamjit Kongsupon; Gareth I Walters; Peymané Adab; Rachel E Jordan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 7.  Work-related asthma: A position paper from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and the National Asthma Council Australia.

Authors:  Ryan Hoy; Jonathan Burdon; Ling Chen; Susan Miles; Jennifer L Perret; Shivonne Prasad; Naghmeh Radhakrishna; Janet Rimmer; Malcolm R Sim; Deborah Yates; Graeme Zosky
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 6.424

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.