Katarina Hauser1, Jan Matthes2. 1. Department of Pharmacology II, University of Cologne, Gleueler Strasse 24, 50931, Köln (Cologne), Germany. 2. Department of Pharmacology II, University of Cologne, Gleueler Strasse 24, 50931, Köln (Cologne), Germany. jan.mattthes@uni-koeln.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Poor medication communication of physicians to patients is detrimental, e.g. for medication adherence. Reasons for physicians' deficits in medication communication may be unfavourable conditions in daily practice or already insufficient training during their (undergraduate) medical studies. We explored medical students' communication on new medications in simulated physician-patient conversations to identify actual deficits indicating apparent educational needs. METHODS: Fifth year medical students attending a mandatory course at the University of Cologne had simulated physician-patient consultations aiming at drug prescription. In 2015, 21 consultations were recorded, transcribed and subjected to qualitative content analysis based on the method of inductive coding. RESULTS: Even essential information on drug therapy was often lacking (e.g. adverse effects, drug administration). Some aspects were addressed more frequently than others. This seemed to differ depending on the diagnosis underlying the particular treatment (acute event vs. chronic disease). The extent of information on drug treatments given in simulated physician-patient consultations varied significantly between students. CONCLUSIONS: Fifth year medical students showed appreciable deficits in communicating drug prescriptions to patients though there were remarkable inter-individual differences. Our findings suggest that communication on drug therapy to patients is no self-evolving skill. Thus, there is obviously a need for emphasizing medication communication in the training of medical students. Communication aids specifically aiming at medication communication might facilitate learning of adequate medication communication skills.
PURPOSE: Poor medication communication of physicians to patients is detrimental, e.g. for medication adherence. Reasons for physicians' deficits in medication communication may be unfavourable conditions in daily practice or already insufficient training during their (undergraduate) medical studies. We explored medical students' communication on new medications in simulated physician-patient conversations to identify actual deficits indicating apparent educational needs. METHODS: Fifth year medical students attending a mandatory course at the University of Cologne had simulated physician-patient consultations aiming at drug prescription. In 2015, 21 consultations were recorded, transcribed and subjected to qualitative content analysis based on the method of inductive coding. RESULTS: Even essential information on drug therapy was often lacking (e.g. adverse effects, drug administration). Some aspects were addressed more frequently than others. This seemed to differ depending on the diagnosis underlying the particular treatment (acute event vs. chronic disease). The extent of information on drug treatments given in simulated physician-patient consultations varied significantly between students. CONCLUSIONS: Fifth year medical students showed appreciable deficits in communicating drug prescriptions to patients though there were remarkable inter-individual differences. Our findings suggest that communication on drug therapy to patients is no self-evolving skill. Thus, there is obviously a need for emphasizing medication communication in the training of medical students. Communication aids specifically aiming at medication communication might facilitate learning of adequate medication communication skills.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical pharmacology; Drug information; Medical education; Patient-physician relation; Prescribing
Authors: Scot H Simpson; Dean T Eurich; Sumit R Majumdar; Rajdeep S Padwal; Ross T Tsuyuki; Janice Varney; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: BMJ Date: 2006-06-21
Authors: Hayden B Bosworth; Bradi B Granger; Phil Mendys; Ralph Brindis; Rebecca Burkholder; Susan M Czajkowski; Jodi G Daniel; Inger Ekman; Michael Ho; Mimi Johnson; Stephen E Kimmel; Larry Z Liu; John Musaus; William H Shrank; Elizabeth Whalley Buono; Karen Weiss; Christopher B Granger Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Patrik Aronsson; Shirley Booth; Staffan Hägg; Karin Kjellgren; Ann Zetterqvist; Gunnar Tobin; Margareta Reis Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 2.463