Donald J Cegala1, Stefne Lenzmeier Broz. 1. School of Journalism & Communication and Department of Family Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, 43210, USA. cegala.1@osu.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: Significant shortcomings have been noted in the literature in communication skills training for practising doctors. Given the importance of competent communication to the doctor-patient relationship and health care in general, these shortcomings should be addressed in future research. OBJECTIVE: Research into physician communication skills training is examined with respect to the communication objectives and behaviours that are addressed. METHODS: A Medline search of literature from 1990 to the present was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies of doctor communication skills training were found. The majority of studies included insufficient information about the communication behaviours taught to participants. In several studies, there was a mismatch between stated behaviours and instruments or procedures used to assess them. CONCLUSION: Three recommendations are suggested. Firstly, future researchers should take greater care in matching assessment instruments with stated communication skills. Secondly, researchers should provide and use a theoretical framework for selecting communication skills to address in interventions, and thirdly, the timing of communication skills within the interview context should be part of the instruction in interventions.
CONTEXT: Significant shortcomings have been noted in the literature in communication skills training for practising doctors. Given the importance of competent communication to the doctor-patient relationship and health care in general, these shortcomings should be addressed in future research. OBJECTIVE: Research into physician communication skills training is examined with respect to the communication objectives and behaviours that are addressed. METHODS: A Medline search of literature from 1990 to the present was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies of doctor communication skills training were found. The majority of studies included insufficient information about the communication behaviours taught to participants. In several studies, there was a mismatch between stated behaviours and instruments or procedures used to assess them. CONCLUSION: Three recommendations are suggested. Firstly, future researchers should take greater care in matching assessment instruments with stated communication skills. Secondly, researchers should provide and use a theoretical framework for selecting communication skills to address in interventions, and thirdly, the timing of communication skills within the interview context should be part of the instruction in interventions.
Authors: John Heritage; Jeffrey D Robinson; Marc N Elliott; Megan Beckett; Michael Wilkes Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-08-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jenna E Reno; Jacob Thomas; Jennifer Pyrzanowski; Steven Lockhart; Sean T O'Leary; Elizabeth J Campagna; Amanda F Dempsey Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2019-01-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Céline Bourquin; Friedrich Stiefel; Jürg Bernhard; Gabriella Bianchi Micheli; Liselotte Dietrich; Christoph Hürny; Brigitta Wössmer; Alexander Kiss Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-04-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Andrea Mechanick Braverman; Elisabeth J Kunkel; Leo Katz; Austin Katona; Teresa Heavens; Andrew Miller; Jennifer Jasmine Arfaa Journal: J Patient Exp Date: 2015-05-01
Authors: C Anthony Ryan; Nuala Walshe; Robert Gaffney; Andrew Shanks; Louise Burgoyne; Connie M Wiskin Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 2.463