Literature DB >> 32941670

Environmental deformations dynamically shift human spatial memory.

Alexandra T Keinath1, Ohad Rechnitz2, Vijay Balasubramanian3, Russell A Epstein1.   

Abstract

Place and grid cells in the hippocampal formation are commonly thought to support a unified and coherent cognitive map of space. This mapping mechanism faces a challenge when a navigator is placed in a familiar environment that has been deformed from its original shape. Under such circumstances, many transformations could plausibly serve to map a navigator's familiar cognitive map to the deformed space. Previous empirical results indicate that the firing fields of rodent place and grid cells stretch or compress in a manner that approximately matches the environmental deformation, and human spatial memory exhibits similar distortions. These effects have been interpreted as evidence that reshaping a familiar environment elicits an analogously reshaped cognitive map. However, recent work has suggested an alternative explanation, whereby deformation-induced distortions of the grid code are attributable to a mechanism that dynamically anchors grid fields to the most recently experienced boundary, thus causing history-dependent shifts in grid phase. This interpretation raises the possibility that human spatial memory will exhibit similar history-dependent dynamics. To test this prediction, we taught participants the locations of objects in a virtual environment and then probed their memory for these locations in deformed versions of this environment. Across three experiments with variable access to visual and vestibular cues, we observed the predicted pattern, whereby the remembered locations of objects were shifted from trial to trial depending on the boundary of origin of the participant's movement trajectory. These results provide evidence for a dynamic anchoring mechanism that governs both neuronal firing and spatial memory.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  boundaries; environmental deformations; grid cells; human spatial memory; place cells; virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32941670      PMCID: PMC8293620          DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  55 in total

1.  Local transformations of the hippocampal cognitive map.

Authors:  Julija Krupic; Marius Bauza; Stephen Burton; John O'Keefe
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Grid cell symmetry is shaped by environmental geometry.

Authors:  Julija Krupic; Marius Bauza; Stephen Burton; Caswell Barry; John O'Keefe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Insights from a rodent navigation model.

Authors:  Denis Sheynikhovich; Ricardo Chavarriaga; Thomas Strösslin; Angelo Arleo; Wulfram Gerstner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  What grid cells convey about rat location.

Authors:  Ila R Fiete; Yoram Burak; Ted Brookings
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Influence of boundary removal on the spatial representations of the medial entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Francesco Savelli; D Yoganarasimha; James J Knierim
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Entorhinal velocity signals reflect environmental geometry.

Authors:  Robert G K Munn; Caitlin S Mallory; Kiah Hardcastle; Dane M Chetkovich; Lisa M Giocomo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: the hippocampus as a path integration system.

Authors:  B L McNaughton; C A Barnes; J L Gerrard; K Gothard; M W Jung; J J Knierim; H Kudrimoti; Y Qin; W E Skaggs; M Suster; K L Weaver
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Human entorhinal cortex represents visual space using a boundary-anchored grid.

Authors:  Joshua B Julian; Alexandra T Keinath; Giulia Frazzetta; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Geometric determinants of human spatial memory.

Authors:  Tom Hartley; Iris Trinkler; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-11

10.  A hybrid oscillatory interference/continuous attractor network model of grid cell firing.

Authors:  Daniel Bush; Neil Burgess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Dynamical self-organization and efficient representation of space by grid cells.

Authors:  Ronald W DiTullio; Vijay Balasubramanian
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Structuring Knowledge with Cognitive Maps and Cognitive Graphs.

Authors:  Michael Peer; Iva K Brunec; Nora S Newcombe; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 20.229

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.