Pernille F Rønn1,2, Gregers S Andersen1, Torsten Lauritzen3, Dirk L Christensen1,4, Mette Aadahl5,6, Bendix Carstensen1, Marit E Jørgensen1,7. 1. Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark. 2. Department of Public Health, Centre for Arctic Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 3. Department of Public Health, General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 4. Department of Public Health, Global Health Section, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Research Centre for Prevention and Health, the Capital Region of Denmark, Glostrup, Denmark. 6. Department of Public Health, Section of Health Services Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ethnic variation in abdominal fat distribution may explain differences in cardiometabolic risk between populations. However, the ability of anthropometric measures to quantify abdominal fat is not clearly understood across ethnic groups. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between anthropometric measures and visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAT) in Inuit, Africans and Europeans. METHODS: We combined cross-sectional data from 3 studies conducted in Greenland, Kenya and Denmark using similar methodology. A total of 5275 individuals (3083 Inuit, 1397 Africans and 795 Europeans) aged 17-95 years with measures of anthropometry and ultrasonography of abdominal fat were included in the study. Multiple regression models with fractional polynomials were used to analyse VAT and SAT as functions of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio and body fat percentage. RESULTS: The associations between conventional anthropometric measures and abdominal fat distribution varied by ethnicity in almost all models. Europeans had the highest levels of VAT in adjusted analyses and Africans the lowest with ethnic differences most apparent at higher levels of the anthropometric measures. Similar ethnic differences were seen in the associations with SAT for a given anthropometric measure. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional anthropometric measures like BMI and waist circumference do not reflect the same amount of VAT and SAT across ethnic groups. Thus, the obesity level at which Inuit and Africans are at increased cardiometabolic risk is likely to differ from that of Europeans. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
BACKGROUND: Ethnic variation in abdominal fat distribution may explain differences in cardiometabolic risk between populations. However, the ability of anthropometric measures to quantify abdominal fat is not clearly understood across ethnic groups. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between anthropometric measures and visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue (SAT) in Inuit, Africans and Europeans. METHODS: We combined cross-sectional data from 3 studies conducted in Greenland, Kenya and Denmark using similar methodology. A total of 5275 individuals (3083 Inuit, 1397 Africans and 795 Europeans) aged 17-95 years with measures of anthropometry and ultrasonography of abdominal fat were included in the study. Multiple regression models with fractional polynomials were used to analyse VAT and SAT as functions of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio and body fat percentage. RESULTS: The associations between conventional anthropometric measures and abdominal fat distribution varied by ethnicity in almost all models. Europeans had the highest levels of VAT in adjusted analyses and Africans the lowest with ethnic differences most apparent at higher levels of the anthropometric measures. Similar ethnic differences were seen in the associations with SAT for a given anthropometric measure. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional anthropometric measures like BMI and waist circumference do not reflect the same amount of VAT and SAT across ethnic groups. Thus, the obesity level at which Inuit and Africans are at increased cardiometabolic risk is likely to differ from that of Europeans. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHNICITY; INTERNATIONAL HLTH; OBESITY
Authors: Alexander Frenzel; Hans Binder; Nadja Walter; Kerstin Wirkner; Markus Loeffler; Henry Loeffler-Wirth Journal: NPJ Aging Mech Dis Date: 2020-03-24
Authors: Niels Grarup; Ida Moltke; Mette K Andersen; Peter Bjerregaard; Christina V L Larsen; Inger K Dahl-Petersen; Emil Jørsboe; Hemant K Tiwari; Scarlett E Hopkins; Howard W Wiener; Bert B Boyer; Allan Linneberg; Oluf Pedersen; Marit E Jørgensen; Anders Albrechtsen; Torben Hansen Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Vilde L Michalsen; Kirsti Kvaløy; Johan Svartberg; Susanna R A Siri; Marita Melhus; Ann R Broderstad Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Luciana Zaccagni; Stefania Toselli; Barbara Bramanti; Emanuela Gualdi-Russo; Jessica Mongillo; Natascia Rinaldo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alexander Frenzel; Hans Binder; Nadja Walter; Kerstin Wirkner; Markus Loeffler; Henry Loeffler-Wirth Journal: NPJ Aging Mech Dis Date: 2020-03-24