Literature DB >> 2808528

The motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase is in or near the kinetochore.

R B Nicklas1.   

Abstract

I have tested two contending views of chromosome-to-pole movement in anaphase. Chromosomes might be pulled poleward by a traction fiber consisting of the kinetochore microtubules and associated motors, or they might propel themselves by a motor in the kinetochore. I cut through the spindle of demembranated grasshopper spermatocytes between the chromosomes and one pole and swept the polar region away, removing a portion of the would-be traction fiber. Chromosome movement continued, and in the best examples, chromosomes moved to within 1 micron of the cut edge. There is nothing beyond the edge to support movement, and a push from the rear is unlikely because cuts in the interzone behind the separating chromosomes did not stop movement. Therefore, I conclude that the motor must be in the kinetochore or within 1 micron of it. Less conclusive evidence points to the kinetochore itself as the motor. The alternative is an external motor pulling on the kinetochore microtubules or directly on the kinetochore. A pulling motor would move kinetochore microtubules along with the chromosome, so that in a cut half-spindle, the microtubules should protrude from the cut edge as chromosomes move toward it. No protrusion was seen; however, the possibility that microtubules depolymerize as they are extruded, though unlikely, is not ruled out. What is certain is that the motor for poleward chromosome movement in anaphase must be in the kinetochore or very close to it.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2808528      PMCID: PMC2115846          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.109.5.2245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  26 in total

1.  Interaction of microtubules and the mechanism of chromosome movement (zipper hypothesis). 1. General principle.

Authors:  A S Bajer
Journal:  Cytobios       Date:  1973-11

2.  Characterization of the mitotic traction system, and evidence that birefringent spindle fibers neither produce nor transmit force for chromosome movement.

Authors:  A Forer
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Chromosome movement and spindle birefringence in locally heated cells: interaction versus local control.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1979-09-01       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber.

Authors:  C L Rieder
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1982

5.  Mitotic mechanism based on intrinsic microtubule behaviour.

Authors:  R L Margolis; L Wilson; B I Keifer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-03-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Microtubule treadmills--possible molecular machinery.

Authors:  R L Margolis; L Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Nucleotide requirements for anaphase chromosome movements in permeabilized mitotic cells: anaphase B but not anaphase A requires ATP.

Authors:  W Z Cande
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Do anaphase chromosomes chew their way to the pole or are they pulled by actin?

Authors:  A Forer
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Spindle microtubules and their mechanical associations after micromanipulation in anaphase.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; D F Kubai; T S Hays
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Mechanics of chromosome separation during mitosis in Fusarium (Fungi imperfecti): new evidence from ultrastructural and laser microbeam experiments.

Authors:  J R Aist; M W Berns
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  74 in total

1.  Kinetochore reproduction in animal evolution: cell biological explanation of karyotypic fission theory.

Authors:  R L Kolnicki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Pac-Man does not resolve the enduring problem of anaphase chromosome movement.

Authors:  J D Pickett-Heaps; A Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.356

3.  Microtubule flux mediates poleward motion of acentric chromosome fragments during meiosis in insect spermatocytes.

Authors:  J R LaFountain; R Oldenbourg; R W Cole; C L Rieder
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  Mechanisms of microtubule-based kinetochore positioning in the yeast metaphase spindle.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Chad G Pearson; Paul S Maddox; Kerry S Bloom; E D Salmon; David J Odde
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Cyclin B degradation leads to NuMA release from dynein/dynactin and from spindle poles.

Authors:  Katja Gehmlich; Laurence Haren; Andreas Merdes
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 6.  Kinetochore-microtubule interactions during cell division.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Claudio E Sunkel
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Maloriented bivalents have metaphase positions at the spindle equator with more kinetochore microtubules to one pole than to the other.

Authors:  James R LaFountain; Rudolf Oldenbourg
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  A mechanistic model for the organization of microtubule asters by motor and non-motor proteins in a mammalian mitotic extract.

Authors:  Arijit Chakravarty; Louisa Howard; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 9.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

10.  Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Chad G Pearson; Paul S Maddox; Ted R Zarzar; E D Salmon; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.