Literature DB >> 28084815

Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion restriction in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas in comparison with "high-risk stigmata" of the 2012 international consensus guidelines for prediction of the malignancy and invasiveness.

Mimi Kim1, Kyung Mi Jang2, Seong Hyun Kim2, Kyoung Doo Song2, Woo Kyoung Jeong2, Tae Wook Kang2, Young Kon Kim2, Dong Ik Cha2, Kyunga Kim3, Heejin Yoo3.   

Abstract

Background It is debated whether diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), which is widely used for detection and characterization of various malignant tumors, is comparable with high-risk stigmata of 2012 international consensus guidelines (ICG) for diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion restriction in IPMNs for prediction of malignancy and invasiveness in comparison with high-risk stigmata of 2012 ICG. Material and Methods This retrospective study was institutional review board approved and informed consent was waived. A total of 132 patients with surgically proven IPMNs (49 malignant, 83 benign) who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and DWI with a b-value of 0, 100, and 800 s/mm2 using a 3.0 T MR system were included. Two radiologists independently evaluated imaging parameters of high-risk stigmata and worrisome features of 2012 ICG and diffusion restriction in IPMNs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and McNemar's test were used for statistical analysis. Results The presence of diffusion restriction in IPMNs was the only independent imaging parameter for prediction of malignancy (odds ratio [OR], 11.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.60-39.87; P < 0.001) and invasiveness (OR, 17.92; 95% CI, 3.91-82.03; P < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. The diagnostic accuracy and specificity of diffusion restriction were significantly improved compared to high-risk stigmata of 2012 ICG to prediction of malignant ( P = 0.006 and P < 0.001, respectively) or invasive IPMNs ( P = 0.009 and P = 0.015, respectively). Conclusion The diffusion restriction in IPMNs could be considered as another high-risk stigma of malignancy and predictor for invasiveness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreas; diffusion restriction; intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28084815     DOI: 10.1177/0284185116685921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

Review 1.  Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: Current Understanding and Future Directions for Stratification of Malignancy Risk.

Authors:  Annabelle L Fonseca; Kimberly Kirkwood; Michael P Kim; Anirban Maitra; Eugene J Koay
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 2.  Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas: recommendations for Standardized Imaging and Reporting from the Society of Abdominal Radiology IPMN disease focused panel.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Hecht; Gaurav Khatri; Desiree Morgan; Stella Kang; Priya R Bhosale; Isaac R Francis; Namita S Gandhi; David M Hough; Chenchan Huang; Lyndon Luk; Alec Megibow; Justin M Ream; Dushyant Sahani; Vahid Yaghmai; Atif Zaheer; Ravi Kaza
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-13

Review 3.  Quantitative pancreatic MRI: a pathology-based review.

Authors:  Manil D Chouhan; Louisa Firmin; Samantha Read; Zahir Amin; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Review of the diagnosis and management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Authors:  Stefano Crippa; Paolo G Arcidiacono; Francesco De Cobelli; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  MRI-Based Pancreatic Atrophy Is Associated With Malignancy or Invasive Carcinoma in Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm.

Authors:  Tingting Lin; Xin Chen; Jingjing Liu; Yingying Cao; Wenjing Cui; Zhongqiu Wang; Cheng Wang; Xiao Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Pancreatic cancer in patient with groove pancreatitis: Potential pitfalls in diagnosis.

Authors:  Elias Lugo-Fagundo; Edmund M Weisberg; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-09-29

7.  Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Malignant From Benign Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fan Xu; Yingying Liang; Wei Guo; Zhiping Liang; Liqi Li; Yuchao Xiong; Guoxi Ye; Xuwen Zeng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.