Literature DB >> 28078387

Landowners' Perspectives on Coordinated, Landscape-Level Invasive Species Control: The Role of Social and Ecological Context.

Rebecca M Niemiec1, Roger P Pech2, Grant L Norbury3, Andrea E Byrom2.   

Abstract

To achieve biodiversity gains, landowner engagement in coordinated invasive species control programs across private lands is needed. Understanding landowners' perspectives toward such coordinated control efforts is crucial to facilitating engagement. We conducted in person and mail surveys of 68 landowners in and adjacent to the area of a proposed invasive predator control program in New Zealand. We find that, similar to previous studies, landowners consider the potential socioeconomic and ecological benefits of invasive species control and express a strong desire to enhance native biodiversity. However, we also find that landowners take into account the complexity of the local social and ecological context in which a program will unfold in three ways: they consider (1) the level of contribution by other landowners and urban residents who are benefiting from collective control efforts; (2) the potential for the program to upset the local "ecological balance", leading to increases in other pests; and (3) the probability that the program will be successful given the likelihood of others participating and control tactics being effective. We suggest that managers of coordinated invasive species control efforts may benefit from devoting time and resources toward addressing beliefs about social and ecological context, rather than solely providing financial subsidies and information about control tactics or the impacts of invasive species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collective action; Invasive species; New Zealand; Private lands conservation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28078387     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0807-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey.

Authors:  Edwin A Locke; Gary P Latham
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2002-09

2.  How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis.

Authors:  S B Green
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Applying behavioral theories to invasive animal management: Towards an integrated framework.

Authors:  Lynette J McLeod; Donald W Hine; Patricia M Please; Aaron B Driver
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Key principles of community-based natural resource management: a synthesis and interpretation of identified effective approaches for managing the commons.

Authors:  James S Gruber
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 5.  Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management.

Authors:  Rodrigo A Estévez; Christopher B Anderson; J Cristobal Pizarro; Mark A Burgman
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Predator-Free New Zealand: Conservation Country.

Authors:  James C Russell; John G Innes; Philip H Brown; Andrea E Byrom
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 8.589

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Provision of Urban Ecosystem Services Throughout the Private-Social-Public Domain: A Conceptual Framework.

Authors:  Alessandro Ossola; Laura Schifman; Dustin L Herrmann; Ahjond S Garmestani; Kirsten Schwarz; Matthew E Hopton
Journal:  Cities Environ       Date:  2018

2.  Stakeholder perspectives towards the use of toxicants for managing wild pigs.

Authors:  Ellary Tucker Williams; Christopher A Lepczyk; Wayde Morse; Mark Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.