Literature DB >> 33544753

Stakeholder perspectives towards the use of toxicants for managing wild pigs.

Ellary Tucker Williams1, Christopher A Lepczyk1, Wayde Morse1, Mark Smith1.   

Abstract

Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are one of the most detrimental invasive mammals in the US. Lack of adequate population control has allowed pigs to become established across the landscape, causing significant ecological and economic damage. Given the need for additional tools for reducing wild pig populations, two toxicants, warfarin and sodium nitrite, are at the forefront of the discussion regarding future wild pig management. However, no research has examined stakeholders' perspectives towards the use of toxicants in wild pig management. Given the lack of knowledge, our goal was to determine stakeholders' perspectives towards the legal use of toxicants for managing wild pigs. We surveyed 1822 individuals from three stakeholder groups (hunters, farmers, and forestland owners) across Alabama during February 2018 using an online survey following the Tailored Design Method. All three stakeholder groups were generally supportive of toxicant use, though their views differed slightly by group. Furthermore, all stakeholder groups were supportive of toxicant purchasing and use regulations, while accidental water contamination, human health impact, and incorrect usage of a toxicant were stakeholders' greatest concerns. These results indicate that these groups would likely be in support of using toxicants for wild pig management in Alabama and could be a model for other states or locations. Consequently, these results have direct implications for shaping policy and possible use of toxicants as a future wild pig management tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33544753      PMCID: PMC7870098          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  9 in total

1.  Pesticide regulation, product innovation and public attitudes.

Authors:  J Tait
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2001-08

2.  A framework for sustainable invasive species management: Environmental, social, and economic objectives.

Authors:  Diane L Larson; Laura Phillips-Mao; Gina Quiram; Leah Sharpe; Rebecca Stark; Shinya Sugita; Annie Weiler
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Federal and state pesticide regulations and legislation.

Authors:  T A Miller
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 19.686

4.  Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management.

Authors:  David M Lodge; Susan Williams; Hugh J MacIsaac; Keith R Hayes; Brian Leung; Sarah Reichard; Richard N Mack; Peter B Moyle; Maggie Smith; David A Andow; James T Carlton; Anthony McMichael
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Understanding attitudes toward the control of nonnative wild and feral mammals: similarities and differences in the opinions of the general public, animal protectionists, and conservationists in New Zealand (aotearoa).

Authors:  Mark J Farnworth; Helen Watson; Nigel J Adams
Journal:  J Appl Anim Welf Sci       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 1.440

Review 6.  Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being.

Authors:  Liba Pejchar; Harold A Mooney
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Landowners' Perspectives on Coordinated, Landscape-Level Invasive Species Control: The Role of Social and Ecological Context.

Authors:  Rebecca M Niemiec; Roger P Pech; Grant L Norbury; Andrea E Byrom
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Assessing landowners' attitudes toward wild hogs and support for control options.

Authors:  Carlotta A Caplenor; Neelam C Poudyal; Lisa I Muller; Chuck Yoest
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.789

Review 9.  Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management.

Authors:  Rodrigo A Estévez; Christopher B Anderson; J Cristobal Pizarro; Mark A Burgman
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 6.560

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.