Literature DB >> 26776715

How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis.

S B Green.   

Abstract

Numerous rules-of-thumb have been suggested for determining the minimum number of subjects required to conduct multiple regression analyses. These rules-of-thumb are evaluated by comparing their results against those based on power analyses for tests of hypotheses of multiple and partial correlations. The results did not support the use of rules-of-thumb that simply specify some constant (e.g., 100 subjects) as the minimum number of subjects or a minimum ratio of number of subjects (N) to number of predictors (m). Some support was obtained for a rule-of-thumb that N ≥ 50 + 8 m for the multiple correlation and N ≥104 + m for the partial correlation. However, the rule-of-thumb for the multiple correlation yields values too large for N when m ≥ 7, and both rules-of-thumb assume all studies have a medium-size relationship between criterion and predictors. Accordingly, a slightly more complex rule-of thumb is introduced that estimates minimum sample size as function of effect size as well as the number of predictors. It is argued that researchers should use methods to determine sample size that incorporate effect size.

Year:  1991        PMID: 26776715     DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  281 in total

1.  Demoralization, anhedonia and grief in patients with severe physical illness.

Authors:  David M Clarke; David W Kissane; Tom Trauer; Graeme C Smith
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Predicting conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease using neuropsychological tests and multivariate methods.

Authors:  Robert M Chapman; Mark Mapstone; John W McCrary; Margaret N Gardner; Anton Porsteinsson; Tiffany C Sandoval; Maria D Guillily; Elizabeth Degrush; Lindsey A Reilly
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Yoga Is as Good as Stretching-Strengthening Exercises in Improving Functional Fitness Outcomes: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Neha P Gothe; Edward McAuley
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  The stress process perspective and adaptation of people with schizophrenia--an exploratory study.

Authors:  Yves Lecomte; Céline Mercier
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Central distribution and three-dimensional arrangement of fin chromatophore motoneurons in the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis.

Authors:  Michelle R Gaston; Nathan J Tublitz
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-25

6.  Initial pain and disability characteristics can assist the prediction of the centralization phenomenon on initial assessment of patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Alon Rabin; Yaniv Shmushkevich; Leonid Kalichman
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-11-05

7.  Effects of working memory capacity on mental set due to domain knowledge.

Authors:  Travis R Ricks; Kandi Jo Turley-Ames; Jennifer Wiley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

Review 8.  Illusory predictors: Generalizability of findings in cocaine treatment retention research.

Authors:  Angela L Stotts; Marc E Mooney; Shelly L Sayre; Meredith Novy; Joy M Schmitz; John Grabowski
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Estimating the relative contributions of virulence factors for pathogenic microbes.

Authors:  Erin E McClelland; Paul Bernhardt; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Neural signatures of experience-based improvements in deterministic decision-making.

Authors:  Joshua J Tremel; Patryk A Laurent; David A Wolk; Mark E Wheeler; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.