Literature DB >> 28078030

Lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: a multi-modality, morphologic and functional imaging study.

Jinman Zhong1, Weiwei Zhao1, Fang Ren1, Shun Qi1, Xifu Wang2, Tianchu Lv2, Zhanliang Su2, Hong Yin1, Jing Ren3, Yi Huan1.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the value of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for diagnosing lymph nodes metastasis before treatment in gastric cancer. Eighty-two patients with proven gastric cancer underwent CT, morphological MRI (T2WI) and DWI examinations. Two radiologists independently assessed these images for the presence of lymph nodes involvement. Pathologic findings were considered as "gold standard". Independent samples t-test was used for the comparisons of short diameters and ADC values between the positive lymph nodes and the negative lymph nodes. Diagnostic accuracy of these three imaging modalities was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC). The ADC value of the positive lymph nodes was (1.15 ± 0.01) × 10-3 mm2/s, which was significantly lower than that of the negative lymph nodes (1.48 ± 0.01) × 10-3 mm2/s (t = 18.70, P < 0.0001). The short diameter of the positive lymph nodes (1.54 ± 0.38 cm) was significantly greater than that of the negative lymph nodes (0.95 ± 0.12 mm) (t = 19.03, P < 0.001). The AUC for all imaging modalities combined (0.893) was significantly larger than that for each imaging modality alone (P < 0.05), and the AUC of DWI (0.797) was significantly larger than (P < 0.05) that of morphological MRI (0.733). There was no statistically significant difference between the AUCs of CT and morphological MRI (P = 0.462). In conclusion, CT, MRI and DWI combined present significantly higher accuracy than each imaging modality alone in the detection of lymph nodes involvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stomach neoplasms; X-Ray computed; apparent diffusion coefficient; diffusion weighted imaging; lymph nodes; magnetic resonance imaging; tomography

Year:  2016        PMID: 28078030      PMCID: PMC5209510     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transl Res            Impact factor:   4.060


  35 in total

1.  Discrimination of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with gastric carcinoma using diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Jin Cheng; Yi Wang; Jie Deng; Robert J McCarthy; Gongwei Wang; He Wang; Yingjiang Ye
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Preoperative apparent diffusion coefficient value of gastric cancer by diffusion-weighted imaging: Correlations with postoperative TNM staging.

Authors:  Song Liu; Hao Wang; Wenxian Guan; Liang Pan; Zhuping Zhou; Haiping Yu; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang; Jian He; Zhengyang Zhou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; M L Aubin; J Vignaud; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Spiral computed tomography and operative staging of gastric carcinoma: a comparison with histopathological staging.

Authors:  J Davies; A G Chalmers; H M Sue-Ling; J May; G V Miller; I G Martin; D Johnston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Staging of gastric cancer: correlation of lymph node size and metastatic infiltration.

Authors:  S P Mönig; T K Zirbes; W Schröder; S E Baldus; D G Lindemann; H P Dienes; A H Hölscher
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  K M Sohn; J M Lee; S Y Lee; B Y Ahn; S M Park; K M Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  MRI in staging advanced gastric cancer: is it useful compared with spiral CT?

Authors:  A Y Kim; J K Han; C K Seong; T K Kim; B I Choi
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 8.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology.

Authors:  Dow-Mu Koh; David J Collins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  USPIO-enhanced MR imaging for nodal staging in patients with primary rectal cancer: predictive criteria.

Authors:  Max J Lahaye; Sanne M E Engelen; Alfons G H Kessels; Adriaan P de Bruïne; Maarten F von Meyenfeldt; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Geerard L Beets; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Metastatic retropharyngeal lymph nodes: comparison of CT and MR imaging for diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Hiroki Kato; Masayuki Kanematsu; Haruo Watanabe; Keisuke Mizuta; Mitsuhiro Aoki
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI.

Authors:  Alicia S Borggreve; Lucas Goense; Hylke J F Brenkman; Stella Mook; Gert J Meijer; Frank J Wessels; Marcel Verheij; Edwin P M Jansen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Peter S N van Rossum; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Development and evaluation of a prototype detector for an intraoperative laparoscopic coincidence imaging system with PET tracers.

Authors:  Madhushanka R Liyanaarachchi; Kenji Shimazoe; Hiroyuki Takahashi; Keiichi Nakagawa; Etsuko Kobayashi; Ichiro Sakuma
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in early prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hai-Liang Li; Jin-Rong Qu; Jing Li; Liang-Liang Yan; Hong-Kai Zhang; Yi Wang; Shu-Ning Xu
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-08-02

Review 4.  The role of MRI in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yingjing Zhang; Jianchun Yu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  Value of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in predicting extramural venous invasion in locally advanced gastric cancer and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Yongjian Zhu; Yutao Zhou; Wen Zhang; Liyan Xue; Ying Li; Jun Jiang; Yuxin Zhong; Sicong Wang; Liming Jiang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-01

6.  Machine learning for lymph node metastasis prediction of in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yilin Li; Fengjiao Xie; Qin Xiong; Honglin Lei; Peimin Feng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 7.  Lymph Node Involvement in Advanced Gastric Cancer in the Era of Multimodal Treatment-Oncological and Surgical Perspective.

Authors:  Zuzanna Pelc; Magdalena Skórzewska; Karol Rawicz-Pruszyński; Wojciech P Polkowski
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Gastric cancer and imaging biomarkers: Part 1 - a critical review of DW-MRI and CE-MDCT findings.

Authors:  Francesco Giganti; Lei Tang; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Development and validation of a nomogram for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Yi Yin; Tao Pang; Yu Liu; Hang-Tian Cui; Tian-Hang Luo; Zheng-Mao Lu; Xu-Chao Xue; Guo-En Fang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.754

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.