Fani Madzharova1, Zsuzsanna Heiner2, Marina Gühlke1, Janina Kneipp2. 1. Department of Chemistry, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin , Brook-Taylor-Strasse 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany. 2. Department of Chemistry, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Brook-Taylor-Strasse 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany; School of Analytical Sciences Adlershof SALSA, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Albert-Einstein-Strasse 5-11, 12489 Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
Using picosecond excitation at 1064 nm, surface-enhanced hyper-Raman scattering (SEHRS) spectra of the nucleobases adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine, and uracil with two different types of silver nanoparticles were obtained. Comparing the SEHRS spectra with SERS data from the identical samples excited at 532 nm and with known infrared spectra, the major bands in the spectra are assigned. Due to the different selection rules for the one- and two-photon excited Raman scattering, we observe strong variation in relative signal strengths of many molecular vibrations obtained in SEHRS and SERS spectra. The two-photon excited spectra of the nucleobases are found to be very sensitive with respect to molecule-nanoparticle interactions. Using both the SEHRS and SERS data, a comprehensive vibrational characterization of the interaction of nucleobases with silver nanostructures can be achieved.
Using picosecond excitation at 1064 nm, surface-enhanced hyper-Raman scattering (SEHRS) spectra of the nucleobasesadenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine, and uracil with two different types of silver nanoparticles were obtained. Comparing the SEHRS spectra with SERS data from the identical samples excited at 532 nm and with known infrared spectra, the major bands in the spectra are assigned. Due to the different selection rules for the one- and two-photon excited Raman scattering, we observe strong variation in relative signal strengths of many molecular vibrations obtained in SEHRS and SERS spectra. The two-photon excited spectra of the nucleobases are found to be very sensitive with respect to molecule-nanoparticle interactions. Using both the SEHRS and SERS data, a comprehensive vibrational characterization of the interaction of nucleobases with silver nanostructures can be achieved.
Raman spectroscopy
is widely used for
the sensitive characterization
of molecular structure and interactions. In the structure elucidation
of nucleic acids and their nucleotide building blocks, Raman spectroscopy,
in resonance with electronic transitions in the UV, has been one of
the most important tools.[1−4] The possibility to enhance Raman signals of many
chemical compounds in surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)[5−7] has been used to study the structure and interaction of nucleotides
and nucleic acids off-resonance.[8−13] Hyper-Raman scattering (HRS) is the two-photon excited analogue
of Raman scattering and gives signals shifted relative to the second
harmonic of the excitation wavelength.[14−16]In the local fields
of plasmonic materials the very low hyper-Raman
cross-sections can be overcome,[17−19] and sensitive probing of the
interaction of the molecules with silver or gold nanoparticles, often
used as plasmonic substrates, is enabled.[20−22] SEHRS with
its different selection rules compared to Raman and infrared absorption
spectroscopy provides complementary chemical and structural information.[15] HRS, due to the nonlinearity of the process,
benefits even more from electromagnetic enhancement than Raman scattering,
and it is possible to acquire spectra with cross-sections that are
similar to two-photon fluorescence.[23] While
resonant hyper-Raman scattering in solutions of organic molecules
is feasible,[24] obtaining nonresonant hyper-Raman
spectra from solutions of biomolecules without the help of surface
enhancement is practically not possible because of the low cross-section
of HRS. In addition to a higher electromagnetic contribution in SEHRS
compared to SERS, also the chemical contribution in SEHRS enhancement
can vary.[22]SEHRS spectra of several
chemical compounds such as pyridine,[25,26] bipyridines,[20] pyrazine,[27] and adenine[28] are known. Meanwhile,
first SEHRS spectra of complex biological materials[23] suggest a thorough assessment of the capabilities of SEHRS
as a tool for microprobing of organic structures and materials. For
example, it has been shown recently that the combination of SERS with
SEHRS is more powerful for microenvironmental pH sensing than SERS
alone.[21,29]To explore further the potential of
SEHRS for probing bioorganic
samples, in this work, we report nonresonant SEHRS spectra of five
important nucleobases, adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine, and uracil.
In order to characterize the nucleobases’ interaction with
the plasmonic nanostructure used as SEHRS substrate, the spectra are
obtained with different types of silver nanostructures and the SEHRS
spectra excited with 1064 nm are compared with SERS data obtained
at 532 nm excitation from the identical samples. The data are discussed
before the extensive background of previous work on nucleobases carried
out by means of Raman, SERS, and infrared spectroscopy.
Experimental
Section
Synthesis of the Nanoparticles and Sample Preparation
Silver nitrate (99.9999%), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (99%), sodium
hydroxide (p.a.), magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (99%), borax/sodium
hydroxide buffer solution (pH 10), adenine (99%), guanine (99%), thymine
(97%), uracil (99%), and cytosine (99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Trisodium citrate dihydrate (99%) was purchased from Th. Geyer, and
sodium chloride (99,6%) was purchased from J. T. Baker. All chemicals
were used without further purification. All solutions were prepared
using Milli-Q water (USF Elga Purelab Plus purification system).Silver nanoparticles were prepared by chemical reduction of silver
nitrate by citrate or hydroxylamine, respectively. For citrate reduced
silver nanoparticles,[30] 46 mg of silver
nitrate was dissolved in 245 mL of water and heated to boiling with
extensive stirring. A 5 mL aliquot of a 0.04 M sodium citrate solution
was added dropwise, and the reaction mixture was kept boiling for
ca. 1 h. For hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles,[31] 17 mg of silver nitrate, dissolved in 10 mL
of water, was added rapidly to a 90 mL solution, containing 11 mg
of hydroxylamine hydrochloride and 12 mg of sodium hydroxide. The
reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature.For the SERS and SEHRS experiments, silver nanoaggregates were
formed by the addition of sodium chloride or magnesium sulfate to
the nanoparticle solutions and were mixed with stock solutions of
the nucleobases to give a final sample concentration of 5 × 10–5 M. Due to its poor water solubility, the guanine
stock solution contained 0.001 M hydrochloric acid.
Raman Experiments
The SERS and SEHRS spectra were measured
using an imaging spectrometer by microprobe sampling (10× objective).
The experimental setup was described previously in ref (21). Briefly, hyper-Raman
excitation at 1064 nm was provided by a mode-locked laser producing
7 ps pulses at a 76 MHz repetition rate, and its second harmonic was
used for Raman excitation at 532 nm. The liquid samples were placed
in microcontainers, and the Raman and hyper-Raman scattering were
collected in confocal and epi-illumination microscope configuration.
Typically, SERS spectra were accumulated for 1 s with a photon flux
density of 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1, and SEHRS spectra for 40–60 s with
1.7 × 1028 or 5.1 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1. Spectral resolution was 3–6
cm–1, considering the full spectral range. The hyper-Raman
spectra were background corrected using an automatic algorithm provided
by ref (32).
Results
and Discussion
Using high repetition rate mode-locked picosecond
excitation at
1064 nm with photon flux densities ranging from 3.4 × 1027 to 5.1 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 and silver nanostructures prepared according
to two different protocols as plasmonic substrates, it was possible
to obtain high quality nonresonant SEHRS spectra of the five nucleobases
(chemical structures in Figure ). The overall SEHRS signals yielded in the experiments with
citrate reduced silver nanoparticles were 5–10 times higher
than those obtained with the hydroxylamine reduced nanoparticles.
This is consistent with the SEHRS enhancement factors in previous
experiments with the same nanostructures,[21] pointing to specific properties of the nanoaggregates that are formed
by the different nanoparticles.
Figure 1
Structure and atom labeling for adenine,
guanine, uracil, thymine,
and cytosine.
Structure and atom labeling for adenine,
guanine, uracil, thymine,
and cytosine.Both one- and two-photon
excited spectra with the two nanoparticle
solutions exhibit characteristic vibrational bands of the investigated
compounds, and the SERS spectra obtained here (spectra B and D in Figures –5) are in good
agreement with similar studies reported previously, for example in
refs (11−13, 28, and 33−36). We obtain very similar SERS spectra and very similar SEHRS spectra
respectively with citrate and hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles.
This verifies the high reproducibility of the spectra. Nevertheless,
as will be discussed in the following sections, small differences
were observed, specifically regarding the intensity ratios for some
bands. As will be shown, the molecules display qualitatively very
different SERS and SEHRS spectra (compare, for example, spectra A
and B in each of the Figures –6). One very obvious difference
between SERS and SEHRS spectra common to all five nucleobases is the
signal of the symmetric ring breathing mode, which is particularly
enhanced in SERS but weak or medium compared to other bands in the
SEHRS spectra. This mode is also very strong in the Raman but medium
in the IR absorption spectra of the solid compounds (Raman and IR
absorption spectra of the nucleobases in ref (37)). Regarding the ring breathing
mode, the SEHRS and the IR spectra show more similarity than SERS
with IR spectra.
Figure 2
Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced
Raman
(B, D) spectra of adenine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine
(C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and
532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 5.1 × 1028 photons
cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 ×
1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 20 s (A), 60 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale
bars, 5 cps (A), 1000 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 1500 cps (D); adenine
concentration, 5 × 10–5 M.
Figure 5
Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced
Raman
(B, D) spectra of thymine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine
(C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and
532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 1.7 × 1028 photons
cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 ×
1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 40 s (A), 100 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale
bars, 5 cps (A), 300 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 600 cps (D); thymine
concentration, 5 × 10–5 M. Spectra with hydroxylamine
reduced silver nanoparticles were obtained at pH 10.
Figure 6
Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A) and surface-enhanced
Raman (B)
spectrum of cytosine obtained with citrate reduced silver nanoparticles:
excitation, 1064 nm (A) and 532 nm (B); photon flux density, 4.7 ×
1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B); acquisition time, 40 s (A) and 1 s (B);
scale bars, 10 cps (A) and 500 cps (B); cytosine concentration, 5
× 10–5 M.
Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced
Raman
(B, D) spectra of adenine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine
(C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and
532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 5.1 × 1028 photons
cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 ×
1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 20 s (A), 60 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale
bars, 5 cps (A), 1000 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 1500 cps (D); adenine
concentration, 5 × 10–5 M.Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman
(B, D) spectra of guanine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine
(C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and
532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 5.1 × 1028 photons
cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 ×
1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 20 s (A), 60 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale
bars, 5 cps (A), 500 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 2500 cps (D); guanine
concentration, 5 × 10–5 M.Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman
(B, D) spectra of uracil obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine
(C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and
532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 1.7 × 1028 photons
cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 ×
1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 40 s (A), 100 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale
bars, 5 cps (A), 300 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 1500 cps (D); uracil
concentration, 5 × 10–5 M. Spectra with hydroxylamine
reduced silver nanoparticles were obtained at pH 10.Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced
Raman
(B, D) spectra of thymine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine
(C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and
532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 1.7 × 1028 photons
cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 ×
1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 40 s (A), 100 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale
bars, 5 cps (A), 300 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 600 cps (D); thymine
concentration, 5 × 10–5 M. Spectra with hydroxylamine
reduced silver nanoparticles were obtained at pH 10.Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A) and surface-enhanced
Raman (B)
spectrum of cytosine obtained with citrate reduced silver nanoparticles:
excitation, 1064 nm (A) and 532 nm (B); photon flux density, 4.7 ×
1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B); acquisition time, 40 s (A) and 1 s (B);
scale bars, 10 cps (A) and 500 cps (B); cytosine concentration, 5
× 10–5 M.
SEHRS Spectrum of Adenine
The SEHRS and SERS spectra
of adenine are presented in Figure , and band assignments are given in Table . Both one- and two-photon excited
spectra are in very good agreement with previously reported SERS[8,33] and SEHRS spectra[23,28] of adenine on silver substrates.
In the SEHRS spectra (Figure A,C) the signal of the symmetric ring breathing mode (734
cm–1), which is dominating the SERS spectra (compare
with spectra B and D of Figure ), is similar to those of the other bands. This band is also
very strong in the normal Raman spectrum, but medium in the IR absorption
spectrum of solid adenine (see, e.g., ref (37)). Furthermore, the SEHRS data indicate a strong
contribution from several bands associated with NH2 and
N9–H deformation modes, specifically the NH2 rocking
band at 1026 cm–1, in-plane NH2 scissoring
vibrations at 1487, 1554, and around 1650 cm–1,
and the three bands at 564, 1141, and 1600 cm–1,
which can be associated with N9–H bending modes (see Table for details).
Table 1
Raman Shift Values from SEHRS and
SERS Spectra of Adenine with Hydroxylamine (AgHA) and Citrate (AgCit)
Reduced Silver Nanoparticles and Assignment to Vibrations of the Adenine
Molecule (Based on Reference (33))
Raman shift/cm–1a
SEHRS
SERS
AgHA
AgCit
AgHA
AgCit
plane
assignmentsb
1641 m
1653 m
in
sciss NH2, str C6–N10, C5–C6
1603 m
1600 m
in
str N3–C4, N1–C6, C5–N7, N7–C8, bend N9–H
1554 m
1554 m
1551 w
1553 w
in
sciss NH2
1489 m
1487 m
in
str N7–C8, bend C8–H, sciss NH2
1457 s
1461 s
1461 m
1464 m
in
str C2–N3, N1–C6, bend C2–H, sciss NH2
1397 m
1398 m
in
str C4–N9, C4–C5, C6–N10, N7–C8, bend C2–H
1371 s
1374 s
1372 m
1372 m
in
bend C2–H, N9–H, str C8–N9, C4–N9
1338 s
1335 s
1332 s
1329 s
in
str C5–N7, N1–C2, C2–N3, C5–C6, bend C2/8-H
1270 vw
1275 vw
1274 m
1275 m
in
bend C8–H, N9–H, str N7–C8
1249 vw
1251 vw
in
rock NH2, str C5–N7, N1–C2, C2–N3
1215 w?
1220 w?
in
bend C8–H, N10–H11, str C4–N9, N3–C4, C6–N10
1141 s
1140 s
1136 m
1135 m
in
str C8–N9, bend N9–H, C8–H
1026 vw
1025 br
1026 w
1026 w
in
rock NH2
965 w
964 w
960 w
960 m
in
5-ring def
920 m
920 m
924 w
920 vw
in
6-ring def
792 w
790 m
792 vw
792 vw
out
6-ring def, wag C8–H
734 s
735 s
734 vs
734 vs
in
ring breath
689 s
689 m
689 w
691 w
out
5-ring def
649 m
652 m
out
5-ring def, wag C8–H, N9–H
631 m
626 m
in
6-ring def
564 s
564 s
563 w
560 w
out
wag C2–H, N9–H
482 vw
out
wag N9–H, wag NH2
vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium;
w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.
vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium;
w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.Bend, bending; breath, breathing;
def, deformation; rock, rocking; sciss, scissoring; str, stretching;
wag, wagging; 5-ring, five-membered ring; 6-ring, six-membered ring.The respective SEHRS (Figure A,C) and SERS (Figure B,D) spectra obtained
with the two different silver
nanostructures are very similar. Comparing the SEHRS spectra obtained
with the different silver nanostructures (Figure A,C), we can observe small differences in
the intensity ratios of the same bands. The differences in the SERS
(Figure B,D) are very
weak; a small band at 482 cm–1 associated with an
out-of-plane N9–H and NH2 wagging appears only in
the spectrum with citrate reduced silver nanoparticles (Figure B).
SEHRS Spectrum of Guanine
The SEHRS and SERS spectra
of guanine with citrate and hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles
are shown in Figure . As in adenine, the respective SEHRS and SERS spectra of guanine
with the two types of silver nanostructures are very similar (compare Figure A with Figure C for SEHRS and Figure B with Figure D for SERS). The SEHRS spectra of guanine
differ from the SERS spectra in the region between 1200 and 1700 cm–1, e.g., in a pronounced SEHRS signal of the NH2 scissoring at around 1570 cm–1 and in the
absence of the in-plane NH bending mode at 1351 cm–1 (Figure A,C). The
most prominenent differences, however, are found in the region below
800 cm–1: The ring breathing mode at 660 cm–1 is very strong in SERS (Figure B,D) but very weak in the SEHRS spectra (Figure A,C). Vice versa,
the ring deformation modes at 572 and 517 cm–1 are
very strong in SEHRS and weak in the SERS spectra (see Table for detailed band assignments).
Unlike adenine, the SEHRS spectra of guanine (Figure ) do not show comparable signals for the
ring breathing mode and the ring deformation modes below 700 cm–1 (compare, e.g., Figure A with Figure A).
Figure 3
Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman
(B, D) spectra of guanine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine
(C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and
532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 5.1 × 1028 photons
cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 ×
1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 20 s (A), 60 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale
bars, 5 cps (A), 500 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 2500 cps (D); guanine
concentration, 5 × 10–5 M.
Table 2
Raman
Shift Values from SEHRS and SERS Spectra of Guanine with Hydroxylamine
(AgHA) and Citrate (AgCit) Reduced Silver Nanoparticles and Assignment
to Vibrations of the Guanine Molecule (Based on Reference (34))
Raman
shift/cm–1a
SEHRS
SERS
AgHA
AgCit
AgHA
AgCit
plane
assignmentsb
1664 m
1666 w
1694 s
1696 s
in
str C6=O, C5–C6, bend N1–H, sciss NH2
1562 vs
1570 s
in
sciss NH2, str C2–N10
1543 w
1541 w
in
ring str C–N, sciss NH2, bend N1–H
1523 m
1521 m
in
ring str C–N, bend N9–H
1455 s
1460 s
1457 s
1461 s
in
ring str C–N, bend C8–H, N1–H, N10–H
1385 w
1376 w
1382 s
1388 s
in
ring str C–N, C–C, rock NH2, bend N1/9–H-
1351 m
1352 m
in
bend N1–H, N10–H12, str C2–N10
1289 m
1260 m
1298 m
1299 m
in
ring str C–N, C–C, bend C8–H, rock NH2
1229 m
1225 m
1211 m
1231 m
in
bend C8–H, str N5–N7, N7–C8
1148 w
1147 w
in
rock NH2, ring str C–N
1051 vw
1097 m
1055 vw
1057 w
in
str N1–C2, C2–N3
995 m?
1016 br?
in
rock NH2, ring str C–N
964 w
956 w
957 w
in
5-ring def
865 m
857 m
864 w
in/out
5-ring def, 6-ring def, wag N9–H, N1–H
725 w
726 w
in
6-ring def, bend C6=O
653 w
656 w
658 vs
660 vs
in/out
6-ring breath, 5-ring def, wag NH2
572 s
570 s
575 w
574 w
in
6-ring def
517 vs
517 vs
520 m
519 m
in
6-ring def
459 w?
463 w?
in
bend C2–N10
vs, very strong; s, strong; m,
medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.
vs, very strong; s, strong; m,
medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.Bend, bending; breath, breathing;
def, deformation; rock, rocking; sciss, scissoring; str, stretching;
wag, wagging; 5-ring, five-membered ring; 6-ring, six-membered ring.
SEHRS Spectra of Uracil
and Thymine
Figure and Figure present the spectra of uracil and thymine,
respectively. Previous SERS and DFT studies have shown that both pyrimidine
bases interact with silver surfaces in their deprotonated forms, even
at neutral pH.[13,35,38−40] Therefore, also under the conditions of the experiments
here, the spectra of uracil in Figure and of thymine in Figure must be those of the anions of the two nucleic
acid bases. As for adenine and guanine discussed above, the SEHRS
spectra of uracil (Figure A,C) and thymine (Figure A,C) differ greatly from their SERS spectra, this is
observed for both types of silver nanoparticles. Tables and 4 provide the band assignments for all spectra of uracil and thymine,
respectively. In the SEHRS spectra we find strong signals due to the
C=O stretching vibrations around 1600 cm–1 and a relatively low intensity ring breathing band at 802 cm–1 in uracil (Figure A,C) and around 780 cm–1 in thymine
(Figure A,C).
Figure 4
Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman
(B, D) spectra of uracil obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine
(C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and
532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 1.7 × 1028 photons
cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 ×
1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 40 s (A), 100 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale
bars, 5 cps (A), 300 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 1500 cps (D); uracil
concentration, 5 × 10–5 M. Spectra with hydroxylamine
reduced silver nanoparticles were obtained at pH 10.
Table 3
Raman Shift Values in the SEHRS and
SERS Spectra of Uracil with Hydroxylamine (AgHA) and Citrate (AgCit)
Reduced Silver Nanoparticles and Assignment to Vibrations of the Uracil
Molecule (Based on Reference (13))
Raman shift/cm–1a
SEHRS
SERS
AgHA
AgCit
AgHA
AgCit
plane
assignmentsb
1654 s
in
str C4=O, C2=O
1630 s
1630 s
in
str C2=O, C4=O, bend N1–H, C5–H
1590 s
1595 s
1590 m
1600 m
in
str C4=O, C5–C6, C2=O, bend N1–H, C6–H
1530 vs
1532 m
1530 vw
in
str C5–C6, C6–N1, bend C6–H
1489 br?
in
str C6–N1, C4–C5, C2=O
1400 m
1400 vs
1402 s
1402 vs
in
bend N1–H, C6–H, C5–H
1374 m
1372 m
in
bend N3–H, C5–H, C6–H
1275 w
1272 w
1279 s
1279 s
in
str N3–C4, C4–C5, C6–N1, bend N1–H, C5/6–H
1215 m
1217 w
1219 m
1217 m
in
bend N1–H, C6–H, C5–H, str C6–N1
1103 vw
1098 vw
1104 vw
1098 vw
in
bend C5–H, str C5–C6, C6–N1
1056 br
1040 br
1050 br
1050 br
in
ring def
1011 br
out
wag C6–H
808 w
804 w
803 vs
802 vs
in
ring breath
780 vw
773 vw
764 vw
out
ring def
643 m
649 wv
645 w
in
ring def
600 m
600 m
600 m
600 m
in
ring def
559 m
561 m
560 m
in
ring def
456 m
440 m
452 br
448 br
in
bend C2=O, C4=O
vs, very strong;
s, strong; m,
medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.
Raman Shift Values
in the SEHRS and
SERS Spectra of Thymine with Hydroxylamine (AgHA) and Citrate (AgCit)
Reduced Silver Nanoparticles and Assignment to Vibrations of the Thymine
Molecule (Based on References (35) and (12))
Raman shift/cm–1a
SEHRS
SERS
AgHA
AgCit
AgHA
AgCit
plane
assignmentsb
1652 m
1649 s
1647 vs
1649 s
in
str C2=O, C4=O[12,35]
1600 vs
1601 vs
1604 m
1605 m
in
str C2=O, C4=O[12]
1522 m
1521 m
1520 vw
in
ring str[12]
1456 vw
1477 s
1450 vw
in
bend CH3[12]
1401 m
1397 vs
1400 s
1396 vs
in
bend N1–H, N3–H[35]
1347 m
1352 s
1350 vs
1351 s
in
bend CH3, def C6–H[12,35]
1289 m
1279 w
1282 m
1280 m
in
ring str[12,35]
1217 m
1220 m
1219 s
1221 m
in
str C5–C9[35]
1043 br
1034 br
1031 vw
1034 vw
out
wag CH3[35]
998 m
1000 w
out
wag N1–H, N3–H[35]
821 w
820 w
in
ring def[12,35]
776 w
775 w
785 vs
786 s
in
ring breath[12,35]
650 br
630 w
in
C2=O, C4=O def[35]
589 w
590 w
587 m
584 m
in
ring def[35]
556 m
in
ring def[12]
502 m
501 m
502 m
498 w
in
ring def[12,35]
452 m
444 m
446 w
439 w
out
ring def[35]
vs, very strong; s, strong; m,
medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.
vs, very strong;
s, strong; m,
medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.Bend, bending; breath, breathing;
def, deformation; str, stretching; wag, wagging.vs, very strong; s, strong; m,
medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.Bend, bending; breath, breathing;
def, deformation; str, stretching; wag, wagging.The spectra with citrate reduced
silver nanoparticles (Figures A,B and 5A,B) were obtained by the
addition of nucleobase
solutions to the nanoparticle aggregates; the pH of the resulting
mixtures was 7.5. It should be noted that it was not possible to obtain
spectra of thymine and uracil under the same conditions (pH 7) with
the hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles. Increasing the pH
to 10 by the addition of a sodium hydroxide–borax buffer allowed
us to measure SEHRS and SERS spectra of uracil (Figure C,D) and thymine (Figure C,D) with these nanoparticles. Since the
negatively charged forms of the molecules interact with the nanoparticle
surface, we assume that the concentration of the anions at the surfaces
at pH 7 is too small. These ions are only formed at very high solution
pH values (the pKa values for uracil and
thymine in water are 9.36 and 9.86, respectively[41]) or upon lowering of the pKa by the contact with the silver surface. This is supported by citrate
reduced silver nanoparticles,[13] but, as
our results indicate, not by the hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles.As will be discussed in this and in the following paragraph, for
SEHRS and SERS spectra of both molecules, there are differences between
the data obtained at pH 7.5 with citrate reduced nanoparticles and
at pH 10 with hydroxylamine reduced nanoparticles (Tables and 4 and Figures and 5). The slightly higher relative intensity of the
ring breathing mode at 802 cm–1 of uracil and 780
cm–1 of thymine in the SERS spectra with the hydroxylamine
reduced nanoparticles (compare panel B with panel D of Figure and panel B with panel D of Figure ) could result from
the different orientation of the molecules.[40,42] Under the basic conditions that were used to obtain the spectra
with these nanoparticles (Figure D and Figure D), more nucleobase anions are present and a more upright
orientation of the molecules would be less sterically demanding.In addition to different orientation at different pH, the pH dependent
differences in the spectra of uracil and thymine can also be caused
by the presence of different tautomeric forms of the molecules: Thymine
and uracil can be deprotonated at the N1 or N3 position, which leads
to a tautomeric equilibrium between both deprotonated forms. The distribution
of the two species depends on the temperature, the dielectric constant
of the solvent, ionic strength, and pH of the solution[13,43−45] and has been studied for uracil[13] and thymine[35] by means of SERS
and DFT previously. According to the assignments proposed in ref (13), the N1–C6 stretching
at 1532 cm–1 in the SERS spectrum of uracil is characteristic
of the N1-deprotonated tautomer. In the SERS spectrum measured with
the citrate reduced silver nanoparticles (Figure B), this band is only very weak. This indicates
that, in the case of the citrate reduced nanoparticles, the N3-deprotonated
tautomer contributes more to the SERS spectra, supporting earlier
findings.[13]Particularly, the SEHRS
data can provide valuable additional information
about the interaction of the molecules with the silver nanostructures
at the two different pH values, due to the different selection rules
that govern the two-photon excited Raman process. Similar to the SERS
spectrum, the SEHRS spectrum of uracil at pH 7 (Figure A) does not show a contribution at 1532 cm–1. At alkaline pH (Figure C), a strongly enhanced band at 1532 cm–1 appears in the SEHRS spectrum, clearly indicating
the presence of the N1-deprotonated species. The signal is the strongest
in the SEHRS spectrum and is more pronounced than in the SERS spectrum
of this tautomer (Figure D). Also the band at 645 cm–1 (Table ) in the SEHRS spectrum
at pH 10 (Figure C
and Supporting Information Figure S1) can
be related to a changed distribution of the uracil anion tautomers.
In the SERS spectrum (Figure D), it is not visible as clearly. Figure S1, showing the same SEHRS spectra as Figure C, but for the citrate stabilized silver
nanoparticles, illustrates that the differences observed in the spectra
are indeed pH induced and are very similar for both types of silver
nanoparticles. Analogous to this discussion of the contribution of
the different tautomers to the uracil spectra at different pH, in
the spectra of thymine at alkaline pH (Figure C,D) a new band due to the ring stretching
vibration at 1521 cm–1 appears, which is more intense
in the SEHRS spectrum (Figure C and Supporting Information Figure
S2) and indicates the presence of N1-deprotonated thymine. Similarly,
the band around 650 cm–1 becomes more intense than
in the spectra at pH 7.5 (Figure A,B). These differences between the spectra at different
pH can be associated with the shift of the tautomeric equilibrium
between the N1- and N3-deprotonated thymine.[35]It should be noted here that in the SERS spectra of uracil
(Figure B) and thymine
(Figure B) obtained
with
the citrate reduced nanoparticles, three additional bands can be observed
at 900, 928, and 952 cm–1. These bands appear also
in the SERS spectrum of citrate anions shown in ref (46). Since the same band pattern
occurs in the SERS spectra of uracil and thymine, and only with citrate
reduced nanoparticles (Figure B and Figure B), we conclude that they indicate coadsorption of citrate on the
silver surface. In the SEHRS spectra (Figure A and Figure A, respectively), only a very weak band at 952 cm–1 can be observed. The weak citrate signals may present
an additional advantage of SEHRS over SERS regarding the selective
characterization of other analyte molecules as well.
SEHRS Spectrum
of Cytosine
Due to the very low stability
of the hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles in the presence
of cytosine, we were not able to collect SEHRS spectra of the molecule
using these nanoparticles without a strong background contribution. Figure shows the SEHRS
and SERS spectra obtained with the more stable citrate reduced nanoparticles; Table contains the assignments
of the bands. The most obvious differences between the SEHRS (Figure A) and the SERS spectra
(Figure B) are the
pronounced signals of the C–N stretching mode at 1482 cm–1 and a relatively strong NH2 bending mode
around 1590 cm–1. In accord with the SEHRS data
of the other molecules, the ring breathing mode at 798 cm–1 shows a much smaller contribution to the spectra than to the SERS
spectrum. Both spectra display the contributions from citrate as discussed
above for the spectra of uracil and thymine, with a very small signal
at 952 cm–1 in the SEHRS spectrum.
Table 5
Raman Shift Values in the SEHRS and
SERS Spectra of Cytosine with Citrate (AgCit) Reduced Silver Nanoparticles
and Assignment to Vibrations of the Cytosine Molecule (Based on References (11, 47), and (36))
Raman shift/cm–1a
SEHRS
SERS
AgCit
AgCit
assignmentsb
1635 s
1636 s
str C2=O[11]
1587 s
1591 w
bend NH2[47]
1547 w
1544 vw
str N3–C4–C5[47]
1482 s
1482 w
str C4–N8[47]
1424 s
1422 s
bend N1–H, C5–H, C6–H[47]
1387 w
1373 w
bend N1–H, C5–H, C6–H[47]
1307 vs
1307 vs
ring str C–N[11]
1240 w
1248 w
ring str C–N[11]
1196 w
1196 w
ring str C–N[11]
1103 w
C=O[11]
1036 m
1038 w
798 w
799 vs
ring breath[11,47]
703 w
704 w
ring def[36]
632 vw
ring def[36]
602 w
600 w
bend C2=O[11]
562 w
563 w
ring def[47]
433 w
431 vw
vs,
very strong; s, strong; m,
medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.
vs,
very strong; s, strong; m,
medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.Bend, bending; breath, breathing;
def, deformation; str, stretching.
Conclusions
We have discussed here
nonresonant hyper-Raman spectra of the nucleic
acid bases. In SEHRS experiments with silver nanostructures, at an
excitation wavelength of 1064 nm, it is possible to obtain spectra
of guanine, uracil, thymine, and cytosine, in addition to the SEHRS
spectrum of adenine that has been reported before.[23,28] In order to acquire more comprehensive vibrational information about
the nanoparticle–nucleobase interaction and to interpret the
SEHRS spectra, also one-photon excited SERS spectra of the same samples
were acquired at a wavelength of 532 nm.The spectra obtained
with silver nanostructures that are stabilized
by different molecular species at their surfaces are very reproducible
qualitatively, in spite of different SEHRS and SERS enhancement factors
of the different nanoaggregates. They suggest that the interaction
of the molecules with the silver nanoparticles, e.g., at different
pH values, is independent of the type of nanoparticles that are used.
The SEHRS spectra of the nucleobases differ greatly from the SERS
spectra, due to the different selection rules of the one- and two-photon
excited Raman process. Specifically, they show several characteristics
of infrared-active vibrations. The very strong ring breathing mode
in SERS, which is often used to estimate the adsorbate orientation
with respect to the surface, is relatively weak in the SEHRS spectra
of all five molecules. As seen for the spectra of uracil and thymine
with the silver nanostructures obtained at alkaline pH, the SEHRS
spectra can provide additional information about the interaction of
the molecules with the nanoparticle surfaces. For example, the N1–C6
stretching characteristic for N1-deprotonated uracil is more enhanced
in SEHRS compared to SERS and therefore allows more sensitive determination
of the tautomer involved in the interaction. As a further advantage
of SEHRS we have observed a greater sensitivity with respect to the
nucleobase molecules and fewer contributions by the bands of citrate
ions that are known to stabilize the citrate reduced nanoparticles.
This can be seen by the presence of citrate bands in the SERS spectra
of uracil, thymine, and cytosine, in contrast to almost no contribution
of citrate in the corresponding SEHRS spectra.In conclusion,
it was shown that the combination of one- and two-photon
excitation allows a comprehensive vibrational spectroscopic characterization
of the nucleobase–nanoparticle interactions for a whole set
of nucleobases. The possibility to obtain the nonresonant SEHRS spectra
at relatively low excitation intensities opens new possibilities for
future SEHRS applications, specifically the investigation of biological
samples, which generally profits from near-infrared excitation. The
SEHRS spectra of the nucleobases will help to interpret SEHRS data
obtained from more complex systems, such as spectra from cells. The
high sensitivity of the two-photon excited Raman scattering enhanced
by plasmonic metal nanoparticles with respect to the orientation and
contact with the silver nanoparticle surfaces is a very promising
approach for the characterization of nanobiointeractions.
Authors: Judith Langer; Dorleta Jimenez de Aberasturi; Javier Aizpurua; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; Baptiste Auguié; Jeremy J Baumberg; Guillermo C Bazan; Steven E J Bell; Anja Boisen; Alexandre G Brolo; Jaebum Choo; Dana Cialla-May; Volker Deckert; Laura Fabris; Karen Faulds; F Javier García de Abajo; Royston Goodacre; Duncan Graham; Amanda J Haes; Christy L Haynes; Christian Huck; Tamitake Itoh; Mikael Käll; Janina Kneipp; Nicholas A Kotov; Hua Kuang; Eric C Le Ru; Hiang Kwee Lee; Jian-Feng Li; Xing Yi Ling; Stefan A Maier; Thomas Mayerhöfer; Martin Moskovits; Kei Murakoshi; Jwa-Min Nam; Shuming Nie; Yukihiro Ozaki; Isabel Pastoriza-Santos; Jorge Perez-Juste; Juergen Popp; Annemarie Pucci; Stephanie Reich; Bin Ren; George C Schatz; Timur Shegai; Sebastian Schlücker; Li-Lin Tay; K George Thomas; Zhong-Qun Tian; Richard P Van Duyne; Tuan Vo-Dinh; Yue Wang; Katherine A Willets; Chuanlai Xu; Hongxing Xu; Yikai Xu; Yuko S Yamamoto; Bing Zhao; Luis M Liz-Marzán Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Chang Chen; Yi Li; Sarp Kerman; Pieter Neutens; Kherim Willems; Sven Cornelissen; Liesbet Lagae; Tim Stakenborg; Pol Van Dorpe Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-04-30 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Eduardo Sánchez-Lara; Samuel Treviño; Brenda L Sánchez-Gaytán; Enrique Sánchez-Mora; María Eugenia Castro; Francisco J Meléndez-Bustamante; Miguel A Méndez-Rojas; Enrique González-Vergara Journal: Front Chem Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 5.221