Literature DB >> 28077982

Surface-Enhanced Hyper-Raman Spectra of Adenine, Guanine, Cytosine, Thymine, and Uracil.

Fani Madzharova1, Zsuzsanna Heiner2, Marina Gühlke1, Janina Kneipp2.   

Abstract

Using picosecond excitation at 1064 nm, surface-enhanced hyper-Raman scattering (SEHRS) spectra of the nucleobases adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine, and uracil with two different types of silver nanoparticles were obtained. Comparing the SEHRS spectra with SERS data from the identical samples excited at 532 nm and with known infrared spectra, the major bands in the spectra are assigned. Due to the different selection rules for the one- and two-photon excited Raman scattering, we observe strong variation in relative signal strengths of many molecular vibrations obtained in SEHRS and SERS spectra. The two-photon excited spectra of the nucleobases are found to be very sensitive with respect to molecule-nanoparticle interactions. Using both the SEHRS and SERS data, a comprehensive vibrational characterization of the interaction of nucleobases with silver nanostructures can be achieved.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28077982      PMCID: PMC5215682          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces        ISSN: 1932-7447            Impact factor:   4.126


Introduction

Raman spectroscopy is widely used for the sensitive characterization of molecular structure and interactions. In the structure elucidation of nucleic acids and their nucleotide building blocks, Raman spectroscopy, in resonance with electronic transitions in the UV, has been one of the most important tools.[1−4] The possibility to enhance Raman signals of many chemical compounds in surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)[5−7] has been used to study the structure and interaction of nucleotides and nucleic acids off-resonance.[8−13] Hyper-Raman scattering (HRS) is the two-photon excited analogue of Raman scattering and gives signals shifted relative to the second harmonic of the excitation wavelength.[14−16] In the local fields of plasmonic materials the very low hyper-Raman cross-sections can be overcome,[17−19] and sensitive probing of the interaction of the molecules with silver or gold nanoparticles, often used as plasmonic substrates, is enabled.[20−22] SEHRS with its different selection rules compared to Raman and infrared absorption spectroscopy provides complementary chemical and structural information.[15] HRS, due to the nonlinearity of the process, benefits even more from electromagnetic enhancement than Raman scattering, and it is possible to acquire spectra with cross-sections that are similar to two-photon fluorescence.[23] While resonant hyper-Raman scattering in solutions of organic molecules is feasible,[24] obtaining nonresonant hyper-Raman spectra from solutions of biomolecules without the help of surface enhancement is practically not possible because of the low cross-section of HRS. In addition to a higher electromagnetic contribution in SEHRS compared to SERS, also the chemical contribution in SEHRS enhancement can vary.[22] SEHRS spectra of several chemical compounds such as pyridine,[25,26] bipyridines,[20] pyrazine,[27] and adenine[28] are known. Meanwhile, first SEHRS spectra of complex biological materials[23] suggest a thorough assessment of the capabilities of SEHRS as a tool for microprobing of organic structures and materials. For example, it has been shown recently that the combination of SERS with SEHRS is more powerful for microenvironmental pH sensing than SERS alone.[21,29] To explore further the potential of SEHRS for probing bioorganic samples, in this work, we report nonresonant SEHRS spectra of five important nucleobases, adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine, and uracil. In order to characterize the nucleobases’ interaction with the plasmonic nanostructure used as SEHRS substrate, the spectra are obtained with different types of silver nanostructures and the SEHRS spectra excited with 1064 nm are compared with SERS data obtained at 532 nm excitation from the identical samples. The data are discussed before the extensive background of previous work on nucleobases carried out by means of Raman, SERS, and infrared spectroscopy.

Experimental Section

Synthesis of the Nanoparticles and Sample Preparation

Silver nitrate (99.9999%), hydroxylamine hydrochloride (99%), sodium hydroxide (p.a.), magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (99%), borax/sodium hydroxide buffer solution (pH 10), adenine (99%), guanine (99%), thymine (97%), uracil (99%), and cytosine (99%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Trisodium citrate dihydrate (99%) was purchased from Th. Geyer, and sodium chloride (99,6%) was purchased from J. T. Baker. All chemicals were used without further purification. All solutions were prepared using Milli-Q water (USF Elga Purelab Plus purification system). Silver nanoparticles were prepared by chemical reduction of silver nitrate by citrate or hydroxylamine, respectively. For citrate reduced silver nanoparticles,[30] 46 mg of silver nitrate was dissolved in 245 mL of water and heated to boiling with extensive stirring. A 5 mL aliquot of a 0.04 M sodium citrate solution was added dropwise, and the reaction mixture was kept boiling for ca. 1 h. For hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles,[31] 17 mg of silver nitrate, dissolved in 10 mL of water, was added rapidly to a 90 mL solution, containing 11 mg of hydroxylamine hydrochloride and 12 mg of sodium hydroxide. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature. For the SERS and SEHRS experiments, silver nanoaggregates were formed by the addition of sodium chloride or magnesium sulfate to the nanoparticle solutions and were mixed with stock solutions of the nucleobases to give a final sample concentration of 5 × 10–5 M. Due to its poor water solubility, the guanine stock solution contained 0.001 M hydrochloric acid.

Raman Experiments

The SERS and SEHRS spectra were measured using an imaging spectrometer by microprobe sampling (10× objective). The experimental setup was described previously in ref (21). Briefly, hyper-Raman excitation at 1064 nm was provided by a mode-locked laser producing 7 ps pulses at a 76 MHz repetition rate, and its second harmonic was used for Raman excitation at 532 nm. The liquid samples were placed in microcontainers, and the Raman and hyper-Raman scattering were collected in confocal and epi-illumination microscope configuration. Typically, SERS spectra were accumulated for 1 s with a photon flux density of 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1, and SEHRS spectra for 40–60 s with 1.7 × 1028 or 5.1 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1. Spectral resolution was 3–6 cm–1, considering the full spectral range. The hyper-Raman spectra were background corrected using an automatic algorithm provided by ref (32).

Results and Discussion

Using high repetition rate mode-locked picosecond excitation at 1064 nm with photon flux densities ranging from 3.4 × 1027 to 5.1 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 and silver nanostructures prepared according to two different protocols as plasmonic substrates, it was possible to obtain high quality nonresonant SEHRS spectra of the five nucleobases (chemical structures in Figure ). The overall SEHRS signals yielded in the experiments with citrate reduced silver nanoparticles were 5–10 times higher than those obtained with the hydroxylamine reduced nanoparticles. This is consistent with the SEHRS enhancement factors in previous experiments with the same nanostructures,[21] pointing to specific properties of the nanoaggregates that are formed by the different nanoparticles.
Figure 1

Structure and atom labeling for adenine, guanine, uracil, thymine, and cytosine.

Structure and atom labeling for adenine, guanine, uracil, thymine, and cytosine. Both one- and two-photon excited spectra with the two nanoparticle solutions exhibit characteristic vibrational bands of the investigated compounds, and the SERS spectra obtained here (spectra B and D in Figures –5) are in good agreement with similar studies reported previously, for example in refs (11−13, 28, and 33−36). We obtain very similar SERS spectra and very similar SEHRS spectra respectively with citrate and hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles. This verifies the high reproducibility of the spectra. Nevertheless, as will be discussed in the following sections, small differences were observed, specifically regarding the intensity ratios for some bands. As will be shown, the molecules display qualitatively very different SERS and SEHRS spectra (compare, for example, spectra A and B in each of the Figures –6). One very obvious difference between SERS and SEHRS spectra common to all five nucleobases is the signal of the symmetric ring breathing mode, which is particularly enhanced in SERS but weak or medium compared to other bands in the SEHRS spectra. This mode is also very strong in the Raman but medium in the IR absorption spectra of the solid compounds (Raman and IR absorption spectra of the nucleobases in ref (37)). Regarding the ring breathing mode, the SEHRS and the IR spectra show more similarity than SERS with IR spectra.
Figure 2

Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman (B, D) spectra of adenine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine (C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and 532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 5.1 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 20 s (A), 60 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale bars, 5 cps (A), 1000 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 1500 cps (D); adenine concentration, 5 × 10–5 M.

Figure 5

Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman (B, D) spectra of thymine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine (C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and 532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 1.7 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 40 s (A), 100 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale bars, 5 cps (A), 300 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 600 cps (D); thymine concentration, 5 × 10–5 M. Spectra with hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles were obtained at pH 10.

Figure 6

Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A) and surface-enhanced Raman (B) spectrum of cytosine obtained with citrate reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A) and 532 nm (B); photon flux density, 4.7 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B); acquisition time, 40 s (A) and 1 s (B); scale bars, 10 cps (A) and 500 cps (B); cytosine concentration, 5 × 10–5 M.

Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman (B, D) spectra of adenine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine (C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and 532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 5.1 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 20 s (A), 60 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale bars, 5 cps (A), 1000 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 1500 cps (D); adenine concentration, 5 × 10–5 M. Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman (B, D) spectra of guanine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine (C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and 532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 5.1 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 20 s (A), 60 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale bars, 5 cps (A), 500 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 2500 cps (D); guanine concentration, 5 × 10–5 M. Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman (B, D) spectra of uracil obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine (C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and 532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 1.7 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 40 s (A), 100 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale bars, 5 cps (A), 300 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 1500 cps (D); uracil concentration, 5 × 10–5 M. Spectra with hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles were obtained at pH 10. Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman (B, D) spectra of thymine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine (C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and 532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 1.7 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 40 s (A), 100 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale bars, 5 cps (A), 300 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 600 cps (D); thymine concentration, 5 × 10–5 M. Spectra with hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles were obtained at pH 10. Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A) and surface-enhanced Raman (B) spectrum of cytosine obtained with citrate reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A) and 532 nm (B); photon flux density, 4.7 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B); acquisition time, 40 s (A) and 1 s (B); scale bars, 10 cps (A) and 500 cps (B); cytosine concentration, 5 × 10–5 M.

SEHRS Spectrum of Adenine

The SEHRS and SERS spectra of adenine are presented in Figure , and band assignments are given in Table . Both one- and two-photon excited spectra are in very good agreement with previously reported SERS[8,33] and SEHRS spectra[23,28] of adenine on silver substrates. In the SEHRS spectra (Figure A,C) the signal of the symmetric ring breathing mode (734 cm–1), which is dominating the SERS spectra (compare with spectra B and D of Figure ), is similar to those of the other bands. This band is also very strong in the normal Raman spectrum, but medium in the IR absorption spectrum of solid adenine (see, e.g., ref (37)). Furthermore, the SEHRS data indicate a strong contribution from several bands associated with NH2 and N9–H deformation modes, specifically the NH2 rocking band at 1026 cm–1, in-plane NH2 scissoring vibrations at 1487, 1554, and around 1650 cm–1, and the three bands at 564, 1141, and 1600 cm–1, which can be associated with N9–H bending modes (see Table for details).
Table 1

Raman Shift Values from SEHRS and SERS Spectra of Adenine with Hydroxylamine (AgHA) and Citrate (AgCit) Reduced Silver Nanoparticles and Assignment to Vibrations of the Adenine Molecule (Based on Reference (33))

Raman shift/cm–1a
  
SEHRS
SERS
  
AgHAAgCitAgHAAgCitplaneassignmentsb
1641 m1653 m  insciss NH2, str C6–N10, C5–C6
1603 m1600 m  instr N3–C4, N1–C6, C5–N7, N7–C8, bend N9–H
1554 m1554 m1551 w1553 winsciss NH2
1489 m1487 m  instr N7–C8, bend C8–H, sciss NH2
1457 s1461 s1461 m1464 minstr C2–N3, N1–C6, bend C2–H, sciss NH2
  1397 m1398 minstr C4–N9, C4–C5, C6–N10, N7–C8, bend C2–H
1371 s1374 s1372 m1372 minbend C2–H, N9–H, str C8–N9, C4–N9
1338 s1335 s1332 s1329 sinstr C5–N7, N1–C2, C2–N3, C5–C6, bend C2/8-H
1270 vw1275 vw1274 m1275 minbend C8–H, N9–H, str N7–C8
  1249 vw1251 vwinrock NH2, str C5–N7, N1–C2, C2–N3
1215 w?1220 w?  inbend C8–H, N10–H11, str C4–N9, N3–C4, C6–N10
1141 s1140 s1136 m1135 minstr C8–N9, bend N9–H, C8–H
1026 vw1025 br1026 w1026 winrock NH2
965 w964 w960 w960 min5-ring def
920 m920 m924 w920 vwin6-ring def
792 w790 m792 vw792 vwout6-ring def, wag C8–H
734 s735 s734 vs734 vsinring breath
689 s689 m689 w691 wout5-ring def
649 m652 m  out5-ring def, wag C8–H, N9–H
  631 m626 min6-ring def
564 s564 s563 w560 woutwag C2–H, N9–H
   482 vwoutwag N9–H, wag NH2

vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.

Bend, bending; breath, breathing; def, deformation; rock, rocking; sciss, scissoring; str, stretching; wag, wagging; 5-ring, five-membered ring; 6-ring, six-membered ring.

vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad. Bend, bending; breath, breathing; def, deformation; rock, rocking; sciss, scissoring; str, stretching; wag, wagging; 5-ring, five-membered ring; 6-ring, six-membered ring. The respective SEHRS (Figure A,C) and SERS (Figure B,D) spectra obtained with the two different silver nanostructures are very similar. Comparing the SEHRS spectra obtained with the different silver nanostructures (Figure A,C), we can observe small differences in the intensity ratios of the same bands. The differences in the SERS (Figure B,D) are very weak; a small band at 482 cm–1 associated with an out-of-plane N9–H and NH2 wagging appears only in the spectrum with citrate reduced silver nanoparticles (Figure B).

SEHRS Spectrum of Guanine

The SEHRS and SERS spectra of guanine with citrate and hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles are shown in Figure . As in adenine, the respective SEHRS and SERS spectra of guanine with the two types of silver nanostructures are very similar (compare Figure A with Figure C for SEHRS and Figure B with Figure D for SERS). The SEHRS spectra of guanine differ from the SERS spectra in the region between 1200 and 1700 cm–1, e.g., in a pronounced SEHRS signal of the NH2 scissoring at around 1570 cm–1 and in the absence of the in-plane NH bending mode at 1351 cm–1 (Figure A,C). The most prominenent differences, however, are found in the region below 800 cm–1: The ring breathing mode at 660 cm–1 is very strong in SERS (Figure B,D) but very weak in the SEHRS spectra (Figure A,C). Vice versa, the ring deformation modes at 572 and 517 cm–1 are very strong in SEHRS and weak in the SERS spectra (see Table for detailed band assignments). Unlike adenine, the SEHRS spectra of guanine (Figure ) do not show comparable signals for the ring breathing mode and the ring deformation modes below 700 cm–1 (compare, e.g., Figure A with Figure A).
Figure 3

Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman (B, D) spectra of guanine obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine (C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and 532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 5.1 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 20 s (A), 60 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale bars, 5 cps (A), 500 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 2500 cps (D); guanine concentration, 5 × 10–5 M.

Table 2

Raman Shift Values from SEHRS and SERS Spectra of Guanine with Hydroxylamine (AgHA) and Citrate (AgCit) Reduced Silver Nanoparticles and Assignment to Vibrations of the Guanine Molecule (Based on Reference (34))

Raman shift/cm–1a
  
SEHRS
SERS
  
AgHAAgCitAgHAAgCitplaneassignmentsb
1664 m1666 w1694 s1696 sinstr C6=O, C5–C6, bend N1–H, sciss NH2
1562 vs1570 s  insciss NH2, str C2–N10
  1543 w1541 winring str C–N, sciss NH2, bend N1–H
  1523 m1521 minring str C–N, bend N9–H
1455 s1460 s1457 s1461 sinring str C–N, bend C8–H, N1–H, N10–H
1385 w1376 w1382 s1388 sinring str C–N, C–C, rock NH2, bend N1/9–H-
  1351 m1352 minbend N1–H, N10–H12, str C2–N10
1289 m1260 m1298 m1299 minring str C–N, C–C, bend C8–H, rock NH2
1229 m1225 m1211 m1231 minbend C8–H, str N5–N7, N7–C8
  1148 w1147 winrock NH2, ring str C–N
1051 vw1097 m1055 vw1057 winstr N1–C2, C2–N3
995 m?1016 br?  inrock NH2, ring str C–N
 964 w956 w957 win5-ring def
865 m857 m864 w in/out5-ring def, 6-ring def, wag N9–H, N1–H
725 w726 w  in6-ring def, bend C6=O
653 w656 w658 vs660 vsin/out6-ring breath, 5-ring def, wag NH2
572 s570 s575 w574 win6-ring def
517 vs517 vs520 m519 min6-ring def
459 w?463 w?  inbend C2–N10

vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.

Bend, bending; breath, breathing; def, deformation; rock, rocking; sciss, scissoring; str, stretching; wag, wagging; 5-ring, five-membered ring; 6-ring, six-membered ring.

vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad. Bend, bending; breath, breathing; def, deformation; rock, rocking; sciss, scissoring; str, stretching; wag, wagging; 5-ring, five-membered ring; 6-ring, six-membered ring.

SEHRS Spectra of Uracil and Thymine

Figure and Figure present the spectra of uracil and thymine, respectively. Previous SERS and DFT studies have shown that both pyrimidine bases interact with silver surfaces in their deprotonated forms, even at neutral pH.[13,35,38−40] Therefore, also under the conditions of the experiments here, the spectra of uracil in Figure and of thymine in Figure must be those of the anions of the two nucleic acid bases. As for adenine and guanine discussed above, the SEHRS spectra of uracil (Figure A,C) and thymine (Figure A,C) differ greatly from their SERS spectra, this is observed for both types of silver nanoparticles. Tables and 4 provide the band assignments for all spectra of uracil and thymine, respectively. In the SEHRS spectra we find strong signals due to the C=O stretching vibrations around 1600 cm–1 and a relatively low intensity ring breathing band at 802 cm–1 in uracil (Figure A,C) and around 780 cm–1 in thymine (Figure A,C).
Figure 4

Surface-enhanced hyper-Raman (A, C) and surface-enhanced Raman (B, D) spectra of uracil obtained with citrate (A, B) and hydroxylamine (C, D) reduced silver nanoparticles: excitation, 1064 nm (A, C) and 532 nm (B, D); photon flux density, 1.7 × 1028 photons cm–2 s–1 (A, C) and 1.4 × 1027 photons cm–2 s–1 (B, D); acquisition time, 40 s (A), 100 s (C), and 1 s (B, D); scale bars, 5 cps (A), 300 cps (B), 1 cps (C), and 1500 cps (D); uracil concentration, 5 × 10–5 M. Spectra with hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles were obtained at pH 10.

Table 3

Raman Shift Values in the SEHRS and SERS Spectra of Uracil with Hydroxylamine (AgHA) and Citrate (AgCit) Reduced Silver Nanoparticles and Assignment to Vibrations of the Uracil Molecule (Based on Reference (13))

Raman shift/cm–1a
  
SEHRS
SERS
  
AgHAAgCitAgHAAgCitplaneassignmentsb
1654 s   instr C4=O, C2=O
  1630 s1630 sinstr C2=O, C4=O, bend N1–H, C5–H
1590 s1595 s1590 m1600 minstr C4=O, C5–C6, C2=O, bend N1–H, C6–H
1530 vs 1532 m1530 vwinstr C5–C6, C6–N1, bend C6–H
 1489 br?  instr C6–N1, C4–C5, C2=O
1400 m1400 vs1402 s1402 vsinbend N1–H, C6–H, C5–H
  1374 m1372 minbend N3–H, C5–H, C6–H
1275 w1272 w1279 s1279 sinstr N3–C4, C4–C5, C6–N1, bend N1–H, C5/6–H
1215 m1217 w1219 m1217 minbend N1–H, C6–H, C5–H, str C6–N1
1103 vw1098 vw1104 vw1098 vwinbend C5–H, str C5–C6, C6–N1
1056 br1040 br1050 br1050 brinring def
1011 br   outwag C6–H
808 w804 w803 vs802 vsinring breath
780 vw773 vw 764 vwoutring def
643 m649 wv645 w inring def
600 m600 m600 m600 minring def
 559 m561 m560 minring def
456 m440 m452 br448 brinbend C2=O, C4=O

vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.

Bend, bending; breath, breathing; def, deformation; str, stretching; wag, wagging.

Table 4

Raman Shift Values in the SEHRS and SERS Spectra of Thymine with Hydroxylamine (AgHA) and Citrate (AgCit) Reduced Silver Nanoparticles and Assignment to Vibrations of the Thymine Molecule (Based on References (35) and (12))

Raman shift/cm–1a
  
SEHRS
SERS
  
AgHAAgCitAgHAAgCitplaneassignmentsb
1652 m1649 s1647 vs1649 sinstr C2=O, C4=O[12,35]
1600 vs1601 vs1604 m1605 minstr C2=O, C4=O[12]
1522 m 1521 m1520 vwinring str[12]
1456 vw1477 s1450 vw inbend CH3[12]
1401 m1397 vs1400 s1396 vsinbend N1–H, N3–H[35]
1347 m1352 s1350 vs1351 sinbend CH3, def C6–H[12,35]
1289 m1279 w1282 m1280 minring str[12,35]
1217 m1220 m1219 s1221 minstr C5–C9[35]
1043 br1034 br1031 vw1034 vwoutwag CH3[35]
  998 m1000 woutwag N1–H, N3–H[35]
821 w820 w  inring def[12,35]
776 w775 w785 vs786 sinring breath[12,35]
650 br 630 w inC2=O, C4=O def[35]
589 w590 w587 m584 minring def[35]
 556 m  inring def[12]
502 m501 m502 m498 winring def[12,35]
452 m444 m446 w439 woutring def[35]

vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.

Bend, bending; breath, breathing; def, deformation; str, stretching; wag, wagging.

vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad. Bend, bending; breath, breathing; def, deformation; str, stretching; wag, wagging. vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad. Bend, bending; breath, breathing; def, deformation; str, stretching; wag, wagging. The spectra with citrate reduced silver nanoparticles (Figures A,B and 5A,B) were obtained by the addition of nucleobase solutions to the nanoparticle aggregates; the pH of the resulting mixtures was 7.5. It should be noted that it was not possible to obtain spectra of thymine and uracil under the same conditions (pH 7) with the hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles. Increasing the pH to 10 by the addition of a sodium hydroxideborax buffer allowed us to measure SEHRS and SERS spectra of uracil (Figure C,D) and thymine (Figure C,D) with these nanoparticles. Since the negatively charged forms of the molecules interact with the nanoparticle surface, we assume that the concentration of the anions at the surfaces at pH 7 is too small. These ions are only formed at very high solution pH values (the pKa values for uracil and thymine in water are 9.36 and 9.86, respectively[41]) or upon lowering of the pKa by the contact with the silver surface. This is supported by citrate reduced silver nanoparticles,[13] but, as our results indicate, not by the hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles. As will be discussed in this and in the following paragraph, for SEHRS and SERS spectra of both molecules, there are differences between the data obtained at pH 7.5 with citrate reduced nanoparticles and at pH 10 with hydroxylamine reduced nanoparticles (Tables and 4 and Figures and 5). The slightly higher relative intensity of the ring breathing mode at 802 cm–1 of uracil and 780 cm–1 of thymine in the SERS spectra with the hydroxylamine reduced nanoparticles (compare panel B with panel D of Figure and panel B with panel D of Figure ) could result from the different orientation of the molecules.[40,42] Under the basic conditions that were used to obtain the spectra with these nanoparticles (Figure D and Figure D), more nucleobase anions are present and a more upright orientation of the molecules would be less sterically demanding. In addition to different orientation at different pH, the pH dependent differences in the spectra of uracil and thymine can also be caused by the presence of different tautomeric forms of the molecules: Thymine and uracil can be deprotonated at the N1 or N3 position, which leads to a tautomeric equilibrium between both deprotonated forms. The distribution of the two species depends on the temperature, the dielectric constant of the solvent, ionic strength, and pH of the solution[13,43−45] and has been studied for uracil[13] and thymine[35] by means of SERS and DFT previously. According to the assignments proposed in ref (13), the N1–C6 stretching at 1532 cm–1 in the SERS spectrum of uracil is characteristic of the N1-deprotonated tautomer. In the SERS spectrum measured with the citrate reduced silver nanoparticles (Figure B), this band is only very weak. This indicates that, in the case of the citrate reduced nanoparticles, the N3-deprotonated tautomer contributes more to the SERS spectra, supporting earlier findings.[13] Particularly, the SEHRS data can provide valuable additional information about the interaction of the molecules with the silver nanostructures at the two different pH values, due to the different selection rules that govern the two-photon excited Raman process. Similar to the SERS spectrum, the SEHRS spectrum of uracil at pH 7 (Figure A) does not show a contribution at 1532 cm–1. At alkaline pH (Figure C), a strongly enhanced band at 1532 cm–1 appears in the SEHRS spectrum, clearly indicating the presence of the N1-deprotonated species. The signal is the strongest in the SEHRS spectrum and is more pronounced than in the SERS spectrum of this tautomer (Figure D). Also the band at 645 cm–1 (Table ) in the SEHRS spectrum at pH 10 (Figure C and Supporting Information Figure S1) can be related to a changed distribution of the uracil anion tautomers. In the SERS spectrum (Figure D), it is not visible as clearly. Figure S1, showing the same SEHRS spectra as Figure C, but for the citrate stabilized silver nanoparticles, illustrates that the differences observed in the spectra are indeed pH induced and are very similar for both types of silver nanoparticles. Analogous to this discussion of the contribution of the different tautomers to the uracil spectra at different pH, in the spectra of thymine at alkaline pH (Figure C,D) a new band due to the ring stretching vibration at 1521 cm–1 appears, which is more intense in the SEHRS spectrum (Figure C and Supporting Information Figure S2) and indicates the presence of N1-deprotonated thymine. Similarly, the band around 650 cm–1 becomes more intense than in the spectra at pH 7.5 (Figure A,B). These differences between the spectra at different pH can be associated with the shift of the tautomeric equilibrium between the N1- and N3-deprotonated thymine.[35] It should be noted here that in the SERS spectra of uracil (Figure B) and thymine (Figure B) obtained with the citrate reduced nanoparticles, three additional bands can be observed at 900, 928, and 952 cm–1. These bands appear also in the SERS spectrum of citrate anions shown in ref (46). Since the same band pattern occurs in the SERS spectra of uracil and thymine, and only with citrate reduced nanoparticles (Figure B and Figure B), we conclude that they indicate coadsorption of citrate on the silver surface. In the SEHRS spectra (Figure A and Figure A, respectively), only a very weak band at 952 cm–1 can be observed. The weak citrate signals may present an additional advantage of SEHRS over SERS regarding the selective characterization of other analyte molecules as well.

SEHRS Spectrum of Cytosine

Due to the very low stability of the hydroxylamine reduced silver nanoparticles in the presence of cytosine, we were not able to collect SEHRS spectra of the molecule using these nanoparticles without a strong background contribution. Figure shows the SEHRS and SERS spectra obtained with the more stable citrate reduced nanoparticles; Table contains the assignments of the bands. The most obvious differences between the SEHRS (Figure A) and the SERS spectra (Figure B) are the pronounced signals of the C–N stretching mode at 1482 cm–1 and a relatively strong NH2 bending mode around 1590 cm–1. In accord with the SEHRS data of the other molecules, the ring breathing mode at 798 cm–1 shows a much smaller contribution to the spectra than to the SERS spectrum. Both spectra display the contributions from citrate as discussed above for the spectra of uracil and thymine, with a very small signal at 952 cm–1 in the SEHRS spectrum.
Table 5

Raman Shift Values in the SEHRS and SERS Spectra of Cytosine with Citrate (AgCit) Reduced Silver Nanoparticles and Assignment to Vibrations of the Cytosine Molecule (Based on References (11, 47), and (36))

Raman shift/cm–1a
 
SEHRSSERS 
AgCitAgCitassignmentsb
1635 s1636 sstr C2=O[11]
1587 s1591 wbend NH2[47]
1547 w1544 vwstr N3–C4–C5[47]
1482 s1482 wstr C4–N8[47]
1424 s1422 sbend N1–H, C5–H, C6–H[47]
1387 w1373 wbend N1–H, C5–H, C6–H[47]
1307 vs1307 vsring str C–N[11]
1240 w1248 wring str C–N[11]
1196 w1196 wring str C–N[11]
1103 w C=O[11]
1036 m1038 w 
798 w799 vsring breath[11,47]
703 w704 wring def[36]
 632 vwring def[36]
602 w600 wbend C2=O[11]
562 w563 wring def[47]
433 w431 vw 

vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad.

Bend, bending; breath, breathing; def, deformation; str, stretching.

vs, very strong; s, strong; m, medium; w, weak; vw, very weak; br, broad. Bend, bending; breath, breathing; def, deformation; str, stretching.

Conclusions

We have discussed here nonresonant hyper-Raman spectra of the nucleic acid bases. In SEHRS experiments with silver nanostructures, at an excitation wavelength of 1064 nm, it is possible to obtain spectra of guanine, uracil, thymine, and cytosine, in addition to the SEHRS spectrum of adenine that has been reported before.[23,28] In order to acquire more comprehensive vibrational information about the nanoparticle–nucleobase interaction and to interpret the SEHRS spectra, also one-photon excited SERS spectra of the same samples were acquired at a wavelength of 532 nm. The spectra obtained with silver nanostructures that are stabilized by different molecular species at their surfaces are very reproducible qualitatively, in spite of different SEHRS and SERS enhancement factors of the different nanoaggregates. They suggest that the interaction of the molecules with the silver nanoparticles, e.g., at different pH values, is independent of the type of nanoparticles that are used. The SEHRS spectra of the nucleobases differ greatly from the SERS spectra, due to the different selection rules of the one- and two-photon excited Raman process. Specifically, they show several characteristics of infrared-active vibrations. The very strong ring breathing mode in SERS, which is often used to estimate the adsorbate orientation with respect to the surface, is relatively weak in the SEHRS spectra of all five molecules. As seen for the spectra of uracil and thymine with the silver nanostructures obtained at alkaline pH, the SEHRS spectra can provide additional information about the interaction of the molecules with the nanoparticle surfaces. For example, the N1–C6 stretching characteristic for N1-deprotonated uracil is more enhanced in SEHRS compared to SERS and therefore allows more sensitive determination of the tautomer involved in the interaction. As a further advantage of SEHRS we have observed a greater sensitivity with respect to the nucleobase molecules and fewer contributions by the bands of citrate ions that are known to stabilize the citrate reduced nanoparticles. This can be seen by the presence of citrate bands in the SERS spectra of uracil, thymine, and cytosine, in contrast to almost no contribution of citrate in the corresponding SEHRS spectra. In conclusion, it was shown that the combination of one- and two-photon excitation allows a comprehensive vibrational spectroscopic characterization of the nucleobase–nanoparticle interactions for a whole set of nucleobases. The possibility to obtain the nonresonant SEHRS spectra at relatively low excitation intensities opens new possibilities for future SEHRS applications, specifically the investigation of biological samples, which generally profits from near-infrared excitation. The SEHRS spectra of the nucleobases will help to interpret SEHRS data obtained from more complex systems, such as spectra from cells. The high sensitivity of the two-photon excited Raman scattering enhanced by plasmonic metal nanoparticles with respect to the orientation and contact with the silver nanoparticle surfaces is a very promising approach for the characterization of nanobiointeractions.
  15 in total

1.  Melting and premelting phenomenon in DNA by laser Raman scattering.

Authors:  S C Erfurth; W L Peticolas
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 2.505

2.  Theoretical studies of surface enhanced hyper-Raman spectroscopy: the chemical enhancement mechanism.

Authors:  Nicholas Valley; Lasse Jensen; Jochen Autschbach; George C Schatz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Resonance Raman and resonance hyper-Raman intensities: structure and dynamics of molecular excited states in solution.

Authors:  Anne Myers Kelley
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Hyper-Raman scattering by molecular vibrations.

Authors:  Anne Myers Kelley
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.703

5.  Raman spectral study of metal-cytosine complexes: a density functional theoretical (DFT) approach.

Authors:  Shuanjiang Liu; Guimei Zheng; Jianxin Li
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.098

6.  Structure and tautomerism of the neutral and monoanionic forms of 4-thiouracil derivatives.

Authors:  A Psoda; Z Kazimierczuk; D Shugar
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1974-10-30       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Infrared and ultraviolet studies on the tautomeric equilibria in aqueous medium between monoanionic species of uracil, thymine, 5-fluorouracil, and other 2,4-diketopyrimidines.

Authors:  K L Wierzchowski; E Litońska; D Shugar
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  1965-10-20       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy as a probe of competitive binding by anions to citrate-reduced silver colloids.

Authors:  Steven E J Bell; Narayana M S Sirimuthu
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  Combined near-infrared excited SEHRS and SERS spectra of pH sensors using silver nanostructures.

Authors:  Marina Gühlke; Zsuzsanna Heiner; Janina Kneipp
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.676

10.  Surface-enhanced Raman scattering and density functional theory calculation of uracil on gold and silver nanoparticle surfaces.

Authors:  Kwang-Hwi Cho; Jaebum Choo; Sang-Woo Joo
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.098

View more
  21 in total

1.  Present and Future of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering.

Authors:  Judith Langer; Dorleta Jimenez de Aberasturi; Javier Aizpurua; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; Baptiste Auguié; Jeremy J Baumberg; Guillermo C Bazan; Steven E J Bell; Anja Boisen; Alexandre G Brolo; Jaebum Choo; Dana Cialla-May; Volker Deckert; Laura Fabris; Karen Faulds; F Javier García de Abajo; Royston Goodacre; Duncan Graham; Amanda J Haes; Christy L Haynes; Christian Huck; Tamitake Itoh; Mikael Käll; Janina Kneipp; Nicholas A Kotov; Hua Kuang; Eric C Le Ru; Hiang Kwee Lee; Jian-Feng Li; Xing Yi Ling; Stefan A Maier; Thomas Mayerhöfer; Martin Moskovits; Kei Murakoshi; Jwa-Min Nam; Shuming Nie; Yukihiro Ozaki; Isabel Pastoriza-Santos; Jorge Perez-Juste; Juergen Popp; Annemarie Pucci; Stephanie Reich; Bin Ren; George C Schatz; Timur Shegai; Sebastian Schlücker; Li-Lin Tay; K George Thomas; Zhong-Qun Tian; Richard P Van Duyne; Tuan Vo-Dinh; Yue Wang; Katherine A Willets; Chuanlai Xu; Hongxing Xu; Yikai Xu; Yuko S Yamamoto; Bing Zhao; Luis M Liz-Marzán
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Molecular Fingerprinting of the Omicron Variant Genome of SARS-CoV-2 by SERS Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Antonio Alessio Leonardi; Emanuele Luigi Sciuto; Maria Josè Lo Faro; Dario Morganti; Angelina Midiri; Corrado Spinella; Sabrina Conoci; Alessia Irrera; Barbara Fazio
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.719

3.  Detection of Bioactive Metabolites in Escherichia Coli Cultures Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Heera Jayan; Hongbin Pu; Da-Wen Sun
Journal:  Appl Spectrosc       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.588

4.  A Simple and Highly Sensitive Thymine Sensor for Mercury Ion Detection Based on Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and the Mechanism Study.

Authors:  Hao Yang; Sui-Bo Ye; Yu Fu; Weihong Zhang; Fangyan Xie; Li Gong; Ping-Ping Fang; Jian Chen; Yexiang Tong
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Off-Stoichiometric Reactions at the Cell-Substrate Biomolecular Interface of Biomaterials: In Situ and Ex Situ Monitoring of Cell Proliferation, Differentiation, and Bone Tissue Formation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Pezzotti; Tetsuya Adachi; Francesco Boschetto; Wenliang Zhu; Matteo Zanocco; Elia Marin; B Sonny Bal; Bryan J McEntire
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  High spatial resolution nanoslit SERS for single-molecule nucleobase sensing.

Authors:  Chang Chen; Yi Li; Sarp Kerman; Pieter Neutens; Kherim Willems; Sven Cornelissen; Liesbet Lagae; Tim Stakenborg; Pol Van Dorpe
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Surface-Enhanced Hyper Raman Spectra of Aromatic Thiols on Gold and Silver Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Fani Madzharova; Zsuzsanna Heiner; Janina Kneipp
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.126

8.  Decavanadate Salts of Cytosine and Metformin: A Combined Experimental-Theoretical Study of Potential Metallodrugs Against Diabetes and Cancer.

Authors:  Eduardo Sánchez-Lara; Samuel Treviño; Brenda L Sánchez-Gaytán; Enrique Sánchez-Mora; María Eugenia Castro; Francisco J Meléndez-Bustamante; Miguel A Méndez-Rojas; Enrique González-Vergara
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.221

9.  Steel Wire Mesh as a Thermally Resistant SERS Substrate.

Authors:  Tomasz Szymborski; Evelin Witkowska; Krzysztof Niciński; Zuzanna Majka; Tomasz Krehlik; Tomiła Deskur; Katarzyna Winkler; Agnieszka Kamińska
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 5.076

10.  Theoretical investigation of a plasmonic substrate with multi-resonance for surface enhanced hyper-Raman scattering.

Authors:  Shuangmei Zhu; Chunzhen Fan; Pei Ding; Erjun Liang; Hongwei Hou; Yuanda Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.