Literature DB >> 28075499

Long-term outcome following remote ischemic postconditioning during percutaneous coronary interventions-the RIP-PCI trial long-term follow-up.

Shahar Lavi1,2, Nour Abu-Romeh2, Sabrina Wall2, Mistre Alemayehu2, Ronit Lavi1,2.   

Abstract

The clinical value of ischemic conditioning during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and mode of administration is controversial. Our aim was to assess the long-term effect of remote ischemic postconditioning among patients undergoing PCI. We randomized 360 patients undergoing PCI who presented with a negative troponin T at baseline into 3 groups: 2 groups received remote ischemic postconditioning (with ischemia applied to the arm in 1 group and to the thigh in the other group), and the third group acted as a control group. Remote ischemic postconditioning was applied during PCI immediately following stent deployment, by 3, 5-minute cycles of blood pressure cuff inflation to >200 mm Hg on the arm or thigh (20 mm Hg to the arm in the control), with 5-minute breaks between each cycle. There were no differences in baseline characteristics among the 3 groups. Periprocedural myocardial injury occurred in 33% (P = 0.64). After 1 year, there was no difference between groups in death (P = 0.91), myocardial infarction (P = 0.78), or repeat revascularization (P = 0.86). During 3 years of follow-up, there was no difference in death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization among the groups (P = 0.45). Remote ischemic postconditioning during PCI did not affect long-term cardiovascular outcome. A similar effect was obtained when remote ischemia was induced to the upper or lower limb. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00970827.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac; Clinical trials; catheterization/diagnostic interventional

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28075499      PMCID: PMC6490325          DOI: 10.1002/clc.22668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  39 in total

1.  Evidence that cardioprotection by postconditioning involves preservation of myocardial opioid content and selective opioid receptor activation.

Authors:  Amanda J Zatta; Hajime Kin; Darice Yoshishige; Rong Jiang; Ningping Wang; James G Reeves; James Mykytenko; Robert A Guyton; Zhi-Qing Zhao; James L Caffrey; Jakob Vinten-Johansen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Postconditioning during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: continued difficulty in translation.

Authors:  Warren K Laskey; Alex Schevchuck
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Myocardial infarction due to percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Abhiram Prasad; Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Below normal pre-procedural cardiac troponin I levels are associated with an adverse prognosis after percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Alessandro Lupi; Andrea Rognoni; Maurizio Lazzero; Roberta Rolla; Patrizia Pergolini; Giorgio Bellomo; Lidia Rossi; Angelo Sante Bongo; Allan S Jaffe
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.534

5.  Combined local ischemic postconditioning and remote perconditioning recapitulate cardioprotective effects of local ischemic preconditioning.

Authors:  Ping Xin; Wei Zhu; Jing Li; Shixin Ma; Lixing Wang; Mingya Liu; Jingbo Li; Meng Wei; Andrew N Redington
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Ischaemic postconditioning protects against reperfusion injury via the SAFE pathway.

Authors:  Lydia Lacerda; Sarin Somers; Lionel H Opie; Sandrine Lecour
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 7.  Remote ischemic conditioning.

Authors:  Gerd Heusch; Hans Erik Bøtker; Karin Przyklenk; Andrew Redington; Derek Yellon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Regional ischemic 'preconditioning' protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion.

Authors:  K Przyklenk; B Bauer; M Ovize; R A Kloner; P Whittaker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Remote ischemic postconditioning during percutaneous coronary interventions: remote ischemic postconditioning-percutaneous coronary intervention randomized trial.

Authors:  Shahar Lavi; Sabrina D'Alfonso; Pantelis Diamantouros; Anthony Camuglia; Pallav Garg; Patrick Teefy; George Jablonsky; Kumar Sridhar; Ronit Lavi
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.546

10.  Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; Luciano Candilio; Richard Evans; Cono Ariti; David P Jenkins; Shyam Kolvekar; Rosemary Knight; Gudrun Kunst; Christopher Laing; Jennifer Nicholas; John Pepper; Steven Robertson; Maria Xenou; Tim Clayton; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

1.  Long-term outcome following remote ischemic postconditioning during percutaneous coronary interventions-the RIP-PCI trial long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Shahar Lavi; Nour Abu-Romeh; Sabrina Wall; Mistre Alemayehu; Ronit Lavi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Ischemic postconditioning during primary percutaneous coronary interventions-not ready for prime time.

Authors:  Shahar Lavi; Ronit Lavi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Molecular strategies used by hibernators: Potential therapeutic directions for ischemia reperfusion injury and preservation of human donor organs.

Authors:  E Soo; A Welch; C Marsh; D B McKay
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.943

4.  Effect of comprehensive remote ischemic conditioning in anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Design and rationale of the CORIC-MI randomized trial.

Authors:  Li Song; Hongbing Yan; Peng Zhou; Hanjun Zhao; Chen Liu; Zhaoxue Sheng; Yu Tan; Chen Yi; Jiannan Li; Jinying Zhou
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 5.  Cardioprotection during ischemia by coronary collateral growth.

Authors:  Anurag Jamaiyar; Cody Juguilon; Feng Dong; Devan Cumpston; Molly Enrick; William M Chilian; Liya Yin
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Can Clinical and Functional Outcomes Be Improved with an Intelligent "Internet Plus"-Based Full Disease Cycle Remote Ischemic Conditioning Program in Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention? Rationale and Design of the i-RIC Trial.

Authors:  Yu Zheng; Jan D Reinhardt; Jianan Li; Dayi Hu; Song Lin; Liansheng Wang; Ruozhu Dai; Zhiqing Fan; Rongjing Ding; Leilei Chen; Liang Yuan; Zhihui Xu; Yihui Cheng; Chengjie Yan; Xintong Zhang; Lu Wang; Xiu Zhang; Meiling Teng; Qiuyu Yu; Aimei Yin; Xiao Lu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.727

7.  Endothelial cell-derived exosomes protect SH-SY5Y nerve cells against ischemia/reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Bing Xiao; Yi Chai; Shigang Lv; Minhua Ye; Miaojing Wu; Liyuan Xie; Yanghua Fan; Xingen Zhu; Ziyun Gao
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 8.  Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Authors:  Irene Sandven; Jan Eritsland; Michael Abdelnoor
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.790

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.