Literature DB >> 24692535

Remote ischemic postconditioning during percutaneous coronary interventions: remote ischemic postconditioning-percutaneous coronary intervention randomized trial.

Shahar Lavi1, Sabrina D'Alfonso, Pantelis Diamantouros, Anthony Camuglia, Pallav Garg, Patrick Teefy, George Jablonsky, Kumar Sridhar, Ronit Lavi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic preconditioning may result in reduction in infarct size during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is unclear whether remote ischemic postconditioning (RIPost) will reduce the incidence of myocardial injury after PCI, and whether ischemic conditioning of a larger remote organ (thigh versus arm) would provide further myocardial protection. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We randomized 360 patients presenting with stable or unstable angina (28% of patients) and negative Troponin T at baseline to 3 groups: 2 groups received RIPost (induced by ischemia to upper or lower limb), and a third was the control group. RIPost was applied during PCI immediately after stent deployment, by three 5-minute cycles of blood pressure cuff inflation to >200 mm Hg in the arm or thigh (20 mm Hg in the control) with 5-minute breaks between each cycle. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients with Troponin T levels >3×ULN postprocedure (at 6 or 18-24 hours), where ULN stands for upper limit of normal. A total of 120 patients were randomized to each group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the 3 groups. The primary outcome occurred in 30%, 35%, and 35% of the arm, thigh, and control groups, respectively (P=0.64). There were no differences in creatine kinase or high sensitivity C-reactive protein levels after PCI or in the incidence of acute kidney injury between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: RIPost during PCI did not reduce the incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury. Similar effect was obtained when remote ischemia was induced to the upper or lower limb. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00970827.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angioplasty; reperfusion injury

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24692535     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  22 in total

1.  Long-term outcome following remote ischemic postconditioning during percutaneous coronary interventions-the RIP-PCI trial long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Shahar Lavi; Nour Abu-Romeh; Sabrina Wall; Mistre Alemayehu; Ronit Lavi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Cardioprotection by remote ischemic conditioning: Mechanisms and clinical evidences.

Authors:  Alberto Aimo; Chiara Borrelli; Alberto Giannoni; Luigi Emilio Pastormerlo; Andrea Barison; Gianluca Mirizzi; Michele Emdin; Claudio Passino
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-26

3.  Ischemic postconditioning during primary percutaneous coronary interventions-not ready for prime time.

Authors:  Shahar Lavi; Ronit Lavi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Molecular strategies used by hibernators: Potential therapeutic directions for ischemia reperfusion injury and preservation of human donor organs.

Authors:  E Soo; A Welch; C Marsh; D B McKay
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 5.  Ischaemic preconditioning for the reduction of renal ischaemia reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Theo P Menting; Kimberley E Wever; Denise Md Ozdemir-van Brunschot; Daan Ja Van der Vliet; Maroeska M Rovers; Michiel C Warle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-04

6.  Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces perioperative cardiac and renal events in patients undergoing elective coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials.

Authors:  Hanjun Pei; Yongjian Wu; Yingjie Wei; Yuejin Yang; Siyong Teng; Haitao Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  From Protecting the Heart to Improving Athletic Performance - the Benefits of Local and Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning.

Authors:  Vikram Sharma; Reuben Marsh; Brian Cunniffe; Marco Cardinale; Derek M Yellon; Sean M Davidson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 8.  Effects of ischaemic conditioning on major clinical outcomes in people undergoing invasive procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Louisa Sukkar; Daqing Hong; Muh Geot Wong; Sunil V Badve; Kris Rogers; Vlado Perkovic; Michael Walsh; Xueqing Yu; Graham S Hillis; Martin Gallagher; Meg Jardine
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-11-07

Review 9.  Ischaemic conditioning and reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Remote ischaemic conditioning in percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Xiaowei Niu; Jingjing Zhang; De Chen; Guozhen Wan; Yiming Zhang; Yali Yao
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 1.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.