| Literature DB >> 28075380 |
Nikul K Soni1, Alastair B Ross2, Nathalie Scheers3, Otto I Savolainen4, Intawat Nookaew5,6, Britt G Gabrielsson7, Ann-Sofie Sandberg8.
Abstract
Dietary n-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are associated with reduction of inflammation, although the mechanisms are poorly understood, especially how the spleen, as a secondary lymphoid organ, is involved. To investigate the effects of EPA and DHA on spleen gene expression, male C57BL/6J mice were fed high fat diets (HFD) differing in fatty acid composition, either based on corn oil (HFD-CO), or CO enriched with 2 g/100 g EPA and DHA (HFD-ED), for eight weeks. Spleen tissue was analyzed using transcriptomics and for fatty acids profiling. Biological processes (BPs) related to the immune response, including T-cell receptor signaling pathway, T-cell differentiation and co-stimulation, myeloid dendritic cell differentiation, antigen presentation and processing, and the toll like receptor pathway were downregulated by HFD-ED compared with control and HFD-CO. These findings were supported by the down-regulation of NF-κB in HFD-ED compared with HFD-CO fed mice. Lower phospholipid arachidonic acid levels in HFD-ED compared with HFD-CO, and control mice suggest attenuation of pathways via prostaglandins and leukotrienes. The HFD-ED also upregulated BPs related to erythropoiesis and hematopoiesis compared with control and HFD-CO fed mice. Our findings suggest that EPA and DHA down-regulate the splenic immune response induced by HFD-CO, supporting earlier work that the spleen is a target organ for the anti-inflammatory effects of these n-3 fatty acids.Entities:
Keywords: NF-κB; arachidonic acid; eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)/docosahexaenoic acid (DHA); inflammation and immunity; spleen transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28075380 PMCID: PMC5295094 DOI: 10.3390/nu9010050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
The composition of the different diets used in this study. Data are adapted from [22]. Control = control chow; HFD-ED = high fat diet—eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid; HFD-CO = high fat diet—corn oil.
| Ingredient (g/100 g Diet) | Control | HFD-ED | HFD-CO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | Casein | 22.20 | 25.60 | 25.60 |
| Carbohydrates | Sucrose | 5.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Corn starch | 56.00 | 34.80 | 34.80 | |
| Cellulose | 5.00 | 5.80 | 5.80 | |
| Fat | Total | 5.00 | 15.00 | 15.00 |
| Corn oil | 2.50 | 3.00 | 5.00 | |
| Coconut oil | 2.50 | 10.00 | 10.00 | |
| EPAX oils a | 0.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | |
| Minerals b | 2.00 | 2.50 | 2.50 | |
| Miconutrients c | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | |
| Choline bitartrate | 1.60 | 2.00 | 2.00 | |
| Cholesterol | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Methionine | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.30 | |
| Energy content (kJ/100 g) | 1599 | 1752 | 1752 | |
| Protein E% | 24 | 25 | 25 | |
| Carbohydrate E% | 65 | 44 | 44 | |
| Fat E% | 12 | 32 | 32 | |
| Fatty acid composition d (mg/g diet) | ||||
| C10:0 | 0.20 | 1.47 | 1.33 | |
| C12:0 | 2.37 | 7.58 | 7.72 | |
| C14:0 | 1.54 | 4.58 | 4.78 | |
| C16:0 | 1.90 | 3.44 | 3.59 | |
| C18:0 | 0.68 | 2.26 | 2.49 | |
| SFA | 6.70 | 19.33 | 19.91 | |
| C18:1 | 2.82 | 4.80 | 5.26 | |
| MUFA | 2.82 | 4.80 | 5.26 | |
| C18:2 | 3.62 | 5.03 | 7.36 | |
| C18:3 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.26 | |
| Total | 3.74 | 5.26 | 7.62 | |
| C20:5 | 0.00 | 2.03 | 0.01 | |
| C22:6 | 0.00 | 4.58 | 0.01 | |
| Total | 0.00 | 6.61 | 0.02 | |
a EPAX 1050. EPAX 6015. b CaCO3 (57.7%); KCl (19.9%); KH2PO4 (11.9%); MgSO4 (10.4%). c Corn starch (98.22%); Ca(IO3)2 (0.0007%); CoCO3 (0.064%); CuO (0.02%); FeSO4 (0.5%); MnO2 (0.035%); Na2MoO4 (0.001%); NaSeO3 (0.0007%); ZnO (0.1%); Vitamin A (0.013%); B2 (Riboflavin-5-phosphate sodium; 0.027%); B3 (0.1%); B5 (Ca Pantothenate; 0.057%); B6 (0.023%); B7 (0.0007%); B9 (0.007%); B12 (0.00008%); D3 (0.007%); E (0.25%); K (0.003%). d Diet analyses were performed in triplicates, and the data were obtained by Gas chromatography mass spectroscopy.
Changes in body weight composition and plasma lipid composition.
| Parameter | Control | HFD-ED | HFD-CO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total number of animals; | 9 | 12 | 12 |
| Initial body weight (g) | 27.50 ± 0.80 | 28.60 ± 0.80 | 24.30 ± 0.50 |
| Final body weight (g) | 31.40 ± 1.00 | 33.80 ± 0.80 | 36.20 ± 0.90 |
| Change in body weight (g) | 3.90 ± 0.50 a | 5.20 ± 0.30 a | 8.60 ± 0.50 b |
| Absolute spleen weight (g) | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.00 | 0.09 ± 0.00 |
| Spleen/body weight ratio (g/100 g) | 0.29 ± 0.02 a,b | 0.29 ± 0.01 a | 0.24 ± 0.01 b |
The data are shown as mean ± SEM; different letters show significant different tested by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. To calculate the changes in body weight (g), initial body weight values from individual animals was subtracted from the final body weight measurement.
The fatty acid profiles of different lipid fractions in spleen tissues (mg/g dry spleen biomass).
| Neutral Lipids | Control | HFD-ED | HFD-CO |
|---|---|---|---|
| C12:0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.06 ± 0.02 |
| C14:0 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 a | 0.14 ± 0.06 b |
| C16:0 | 1.03 ± 0.20 | 1.46 ± 0.22 | 3.34 ± 1.05 |
| C18:0 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.03 |
| C18:1 | 1.78 ± 0.46 | 1.05 ± 0.17 | 1.43 ± 0.33 |
| C18:2 | 0.03 ± 0.02 a | 0.2 ± 0.08 a | 0.86 ± 0.25 b |
| C20:3 | 0.11 ± 0.01 a | 0.03 ± 0.01 b | 0.05 ± 0.02 |
| C20:4 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.24 ± 0.14 |
| C22:6 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.16 ± 0.04 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 a |
| Total | 3.16 ± 0.58 | 3.12 ± 0.43 | 6.25 ± 1.37 |
| Free fatty acids | |||
| C12:0 | 0.01 ± 0.00 a | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.04 ± 0.01 b |
| C14:0 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
| C16:0 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.07 |
| C18:1 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.00 a | 0.06 ± 0.00 b |
| C18:3 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.03 ± 0.00 |
| C20:3 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.00 a | 0.07 ± 0.01 b |
| C22:6 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.05 ± 0.00 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 a |
| Total | 0.35 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | 0.60 ± 0.11 |
| Phospholipids | |||
| C12:0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 b |
| C14:0 | 0.07 ± 0.00 a | 0.15 ± 0.01 b | 0.13 ± 0.00 c |
| C16:0 | 1.69 ± 0.05 | 1.70 ± 0.03 | 1.69 ± 0.05 |
| C18:0 | 0.61 ± 0.02 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.04 |
| C18:1 | 0.32 ± 0.01 a | 0.28 ± 0.01 b | 0.31 ± 0.01 a |
| C18:2 | 0.12 ± 0.00 a | 0.22 ± 0.02 b | 0.14 ± 0.01 a |
| C20:0 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| C20:1 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.02 ± 0.00 |
| C20:2 | 0.02 ± 0.00 a | 0.05 ± 0.01 b | 0.03 ± 0.00 a |
| C20:3 | 0.17 ± 0.01 a | 0.18 ± 0.01 a | 0.25 ± 0.02 b |
| C20:4 | 4.41 ± 0.10 a | 1.92 ± 0.05 b | 4.33 ± 0.08 a |
| C20:5 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.41 ± 0.01 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 a |
| C22:0 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 |
| C22:5 | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.34 ± 0.01 b | 0.00 ± 0.00 a |
| C22:6 | 0.20 ± 0.02 a | 0.82 ± 0.02 b | 0.19 ± 0.01 a |
| Total | 7.67 ± 0.19 a | 6.71 ± 0.13 b | 7.78 ± 0.22 a |
The fatty acid profiles from the mice fed either control, HFD-ED or HFD-CO are shown as mean ± SEM and as a proportion of total fatty acid fraction; different letters show statistical difference tested by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. For details see methods section.
Figure 1A hierarchical clustering and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of DEGs showing 76 significantly regulated BPs (p-value < 0.001) related to immune system process for every diet comparison after eight weeks. The heat map is divided into four main clusters according to the regulation pattern and discussed in detail in results section. Color patterns indicate the direction of regulation, where red indicates up-regulation and blue indicates down-regulation of immune specific GO-terms. HFD-ED = HFD-ED vs. control diet; HFD-CO = HFD-corn oil vs. control diet; ED-CO = HFD-ED vs. HFD-CO.
Figure 2Heat map showing gene-expression patterns for any diet comparison i.e., HFD-ED vs. control; HFD-CO vs. control; HFD-ED vs. HFD-CO. for atleast one comparison BH-p value < 0.001 was considered significant. (a) Heat map showing group of genes regulated in NF-κB regulation, in BP GO:0043123 positive regulation of I-κB kinase/NF-κB signaling, BP GO:0051092 positive regulation of NF-κB transcription factor activity, and BP GO:0042346 positive regulation of NF-κB import into nucleus; (b) Relative expression of different genes involved in modulation of NF-κB in mouse spleen. Each gene is normalized against the house-keeping gene Ubiquitin (Ubc), and expression level shown as relative to the control diet; (c) Heat map showing groups of genes regulated in immune-related processes, including BP GO:0045087 innate immune response, BP GO:0002250 adaptive immune response, BP GO:0006959 humoral immune response, BP GO:0016064 immunoglobulin mediated immune response, BP GO:0001771 immunological synapse formation, BP GO:0042116 macrophage activation, BP GO:0002224 toll-like receptor signaling pathway, and BP GO:0002755 MyD88-dependent toll-like receptor signaling pathway; (d) Heat map showing groups of genes regulated in interferon-gamma regulation, including BP GO:0060333 interferon gamma mediated signaling pathway, BP GO:0019882 antigen processing and presentation, and BP GO:0071346 cellular response to interferon-gamma; (e) Heat map showing groups of genes regulated in erythrocyte turnover, including BP GO:0030218erythrocyte differentiation, BP GO:0048821 erythrocyte development, BP GO:0045648 positive regulation of erythrocyte differentiation, BP GO:0030097 hemopoieses, and BP GO:0002244 hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiation.