Literature DB >> 21444218

Effects of scapular dyskinesis and scapular assistance test on subacromial space during static arm elevation.

Amee L Seitz1, Philip W McClure, Stephanie S Lynch, Jessica M Ketchum, Lori A Michener.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scapular dyskinesis is an abnormal scapular motion or position during active arm elevation. Dyskinesis is theorized to contribute to impingement syndrome by decreasing the subacromial space. A corrective maneuver of the scapular assistance test (SAT) proposes to increase scapular upward rotation and posterior tilt to increase the subacromial space. The purpose of this study is to determine the influence that 1) scapular dyskinesis and 2) passive manual correction with the SAT have on subacromial space and 3-dimensional (3-D) scapular kinematics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty asymptomatic participants were classified with either obvious dyskinesis (n = 20) or normal motion (n = 20) using the scapular dyskinesis test. The anterior outlet of the subacromial space was measured via the acromiohumeral distance using ultrasound imaging and 3-D scapular orientation was assessed with electromagnetic motion analysis, with the arm at rest 45° and 90° of active elevation with and without the SAT, respectively.
RESULTS: There were no differences in acromiohumeral distance or scapular kinematics with static active arm elevation between groups. The SAT increased scapular upward rotation, posterior tilt, and acromiohumeral distance in both groups. Participants with dyskinesis demonstrated greater scapular mobility in upward rotation with the SAT, but no additional increase in acromiohumeral distance.
CONCLUSION: Scapular dyskinesis identified during active motion did not result in different 3-D scapular orientation or acromiohumeral distance during active arm elevation in static positions; however, the SAT altered scapular kinematics and increased acromiohumeral distance. The SAT may be helpful to identify individuals where subacromial compression is producing symptoms, regardless of dyskinesis.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21444218     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  17 in total

1.  A COMPARISON OF CHANGE IN 3D SCAPULAR KINEMATICS WITH MAXIMAL CONTRACTIONS AND FORCE PRODUCTION WITH SCAPULAR MUSCLE TESTS BETWEEN ASYMPTOMATIC OVERHEAD ATHLETES WITH AND WITHOUT SCAPULAR DYSKINESIS.

Authors:  Amee L Seitz; Rebecca I McClelland; W Justin Jones; Randy A Jean; Joseph R Kardouni
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-06

Review 2.  Shoulder kinematics impact subacromial proximities: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Effect of glenohumeral elevation on subacromial supraspinatus compression risk during simulated reaching.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Dustin M Schlangen; Katelyn A Schneider; Jonathan Schoenecker; Andrea L Senger; William C Starr; Justin L Staker; Jutta M Ellermann; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 4.  The treatment of multidirectional instability of the shoulder with a rehabilitation program: Part 1.

Authors:  Lyn Watson; Sarah Warby; Simon Balster; Ross Lenssen; Tania Pizzari
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-06-01

5.  Effects of asymptomatic rotator cuff pathology on in vivo shoulder motion and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Timothy G Baumer; Jack Dischler; Veronica Mende; Roger Zauel; Marnix van Holsbeeck; Daniel S Siegal; George Divine; Vasilios Moutzouros; Michael J Bey
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Structured Wii protocol for rehabilitation of shoulder impingement syndrome: A pilot study.

Authors:  John-Ross Rizzo; Peter Thai; Edward J Li; Terence Tung; Todd E Hudson; Joseph Herrera; Preeti Raghavan
Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-03-15

7.  STRENGTH PROFILES IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS WITH AND WITHOUT SCAPULAR DYSKINESIS.

Authors:  Daniel C Hannah; Jason S Scibek; Christopher R Carcia
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-06

8.  Active Scapular Retraction and Acromiohumeral Distance at Various Degrees of Shoulder Abduction.

Authors:  Gulcan Harput; Hande Guney-Deniz; İrem Düzgün; Uğur Toprak; Lori A Michener; Christopher M Powers
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Comparative analysis of acromiohumeral distances according to the locations of the arms and humeral rotation.

Authors:  Haroo Kim; Boin Kim; Jemyung Shim; Haeyeon Kwon; Juhyeon Jung
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-02-06

10.  Interrater reliability of clinical tests to evaluate scapulothoracic motion.

Authors:  Evelyn Baertschi; Jaap Swanenburg; Florian Brunner; Jan Kool
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.