Christine Dehlendorf1, Kevin Grumbach2, Julie A Schmittdiel3, Jody Steinauer4. 1. UCSF Department of Family & Community Medicine, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA, USA 94110; UCSF Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA, USA 94110; UCSF Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA, USA 94110. Electronic address: christine.dehlendorf@ucsf.edu. 2. UCSF Department of Family & Community Medicine, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA, USA 94110. Electronic address: kevin.grumbach@ucsf.edu. 3. Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612. Electronic address: julie.a.schmittdiel@kp.org. 4. UCSF Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA, USA 94110. Electronic address: jody.steinauer@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is a potentially valuable but underexplored approach to contraceptive counseling. METHODS: We determined the correlation between patient report of SDM and of whether their provider had a method preference with measures of satisfaction. RESULTS: Women reporting SDM were more likely to be satisfied with counseling than those reporting a provider-driven decision and were more likely to be satisfied with their method than those reporting a patient-driven decision. Patients who felt that the provider had a method preference were less likely to be satisfied with their method. CONCLUSIONS: SDM in contraceptive counseling is associated with patient satisfaction.
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) is a potentially valuable but underexplored approach to contraceptive counseling. METHODS: We determined the correlation between patient report of SDM and of whether their provider had a method preference with measures of satisfaction. RESULTS:Women reporting SDM were more likely to be satisfied with counseling than those reporting a provider-driven decision and were more likely to be satisfied with their method than those reporting a patient-driven decision. Patients who felt that the provider had a method preference were less likely to be satisfied with their method. CONCLUSIONS: SDM in contraceptive counseling is associated with patient satisfaction.
Authors: Annette M O'Connor; Carol L Bennett; Dawn Stacey; Michael Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Vikki A Entwistle; Valerie Fiset; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Sara Khangura; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; David Rovner Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-07-08
Authors: Christine Dehlendorf; Jillian T Henderson; Eric Vittinghoff; Kevin Grumbach; Kira Levy; Julie Schmittdiel; Jennifer Lee; Dean Schillinger; Jody Steinauer Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Glyn Elwyn; Christine Dehlendorf; Ronald M Epstein; Katy Marrin; James White; Dominick L Frosch Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Lauren B Zapata; Isabel A Morgan; Kathryn M Curtis; Suzanne G Folger; Maura K Whiteman Journal: Contraception Date: 2019-07-29 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Kavita Shah Arora; Xinhua Zhao; Colleen Judge-Golden; Maria K Mor; Lisa S Callegari; Sonya Borrero Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Claudia Geist; Abigail Ra Aiken; Jessica N Sanders; Bethany G Everett; Kyl Myers; Patty Cason; Rebecca G Simmons; David K Turok Journal: Contraception Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Edith Fox; Arlene Reyna; Nikita M Malcolm; Rachel B Rosmarin; Lauren B Zapata; Brittni N Frederiksen; Susan B Moskosky; Christine Dehlendorf Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Lauren B Zapata; Lisa Romero; Maria I Rivera; Stephanie K Rivera-Soto; Stacey Hurst; Zipatly V Mendoza; Heather B Clayton; Nabal Bracero; Maura K Whiteman; Eva Lathrop Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2020-05-04