Literature DB >> 26827879

Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use.

Christine Dehlendorf1, Jillian T Henderson2, Eric Vittinghoff3, Kevin Grumbach4, Kira Levy4, Julie Schmittdiel5, Jennifer Lee4, Dean Schillinger6, Jody Steinauer7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health communication and interpersonal skills are increasingly emphasized in the measurement of health care quality, yet there is limited research on the association of interpersonal care with health outcomes. As approximately 50% of pregnancies in the United States are unintended, whether interpersonal communication influences contraceptive use is of public health importance.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the quality of interpersonal care during contraceptive counseling is associated with contraceptive use over time. STUDY
DESIGN: The Patient-Provider Communication about Contraception study is a prospective cohort study of 348 English-speaking women seen for contraceptive care, conducted between 2009 and 2012 in the San Francisco Bay Area. Quality of communication was assessed using a patient-reported interpersonal quality in family planning care measure based on the dimensions of patient-centered care. In addition, the clinical visit was audio recorded and its content coded according to the validated Four Habits Coding Scheme to assess interpersonal communication behaviors of clinicians. The outcome measures were 6-month continuation of the selected contraceptive method and use of a highly or moderately effective method at 6 months. Results were analyzed using mixed effect logistic regression models controlling for patient demographics, the clinic and the provider at which the visit occurred, and the method selected.
RESULTS: Patient participants had a mean age of 26.8 years (SD 6.9 years); 46% were white, 26% Latina, and 28% black. Almost two-thirds of participants had an income of <200% of the Federal Poverty Level. Most of the women (73%) were making visits to a provider whom they had not seen before. Of the patient participants, 41% were still using their chosen contraceptive method at 6-month follow-up. Patients who reported high interpersonal quality of family planning care were more likely to maintain use of their chosen contraceptive method (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-3.0) and to be using a highly or moderately effective method at 6 months (aOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.5). In addition, 2 of the Four Habits were associated with contraceptive continuation; "invests in the beginning" (aOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.3) and "elicits the patient's perspective" (aOR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0-3.2).
CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that the quality of interpersonal care, measured using both patient report and observation of provider behaviors, influences contraceptive use. These results provide support for ongoing attention to interpersonal communication as an important aspect of health care quality. The associations of establishing rapport and eliciting the patient perspective with contraceptive continuation are suggestive of areas of focus for provider communication skills training for contraceptive care.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contraception; counseling; family planning; health communication; patient-centered care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26827879     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  51 in total

1.  Provider Bias in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Promotion and Removal: Perceptions of Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Renee D Kramer; Kristin M Ryder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Family planning providers' role in offering PrEP to women.

Authors:  Dominika Seidman; Shannon Weber; Kimberly Carlson; Jacki Witt
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Kevin Grumbach; Julie A Schmittdiel; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Racial/ethnic differences in contraceptive preferences, beliefs, and self-efficacy among women veterans.

Authors:  Lisa S Callegari; Xinhua Zhao; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Elian Rosenfeld; Maria K Mor; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Contraceptive Decision Making Among Latina Immigrants: Developing Theory-Based Survey Items.

Authors:  Diana N Carvajal; Paola C Rivera Mudafort; Beth Barnet; Arthur E Blank
Journal:  Hisp Health Care Int       Date:  2019-10-24

6.  The intrauterine device as emergency contraception: how much do young women know?

Authors:  Suzan R Goodman; Alison M El Ayadi; Corinne H Rocca; Julia E Kohn; Courtney E Benedict; Jessica R Dieseldorff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Young Women's Health-Promoting Strategies to Reduce Vulnerability to Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Danielle Cipres; Amanda Rodriguez; Janette Alvarez; Lisa Stern; Jody Steinauer; Dominika Seidman
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Ensuring our research reflects our values: The role of family planning research in advancing reproductive autonomy.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Reiley Reed; Edith Fox; Dominika Seidman; Cara Hall; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Quality of postpartum contraceptive counseling and changes in contraceptive method preferences.

Authors:  Kate Coleman-Minahan; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Edith Fox; Arlene Reyna; Nikita M Malcolm; Rachel B Rosmarin; Lauren B Zapata; Brittni N Frederiksen; Susan B Moskosky; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.