Literature DB >> 28068556

Organizing DNA repair in the nucleus: DSBs hit the road.

Aline Marnef1, Gaëlle Legube2.   

Abstract

In the past decade, large-scale movements of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) have repeatedly been identified following DNA damage. These mobility events include clustering, anchoring or peripheral movement at subnuclear structures. Recent work suggests roles for motion in homology search and in break sequestration to preclude deleterious outcomes. Yet, the precise functions of these movements still remain relatively obscure, and the same holds true for the determinants. Here we review recent advances in this exciting area of research, and highlight that a recurrent characteristic of mobile DSBs may lie in their inability to undergo rapid repair. A major future challenge remains to understand how DSB mobility impacts on genome integrity.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28068556     DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol        ISSN: 0955-0674            Impact factor:   8.382


  29 in total

Review 1.  Preserving genome integrity and function: the DNA damage response and histone modifications.

Authors:  Jae Jin Kim; Seo Yun Lee; Kyle M Miller
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  Nuclear α-catenin mediates the DNA damage response via β-catenin and nuclear actin.

Authors:  Leonid A Serebryannyy; Alex Yemelyanov; Cara J Gottardi; Primal de Lanerolle
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  A positive feedback loop of SIRT1 and miR17HG promotes the repair of DNA double-stranded breaks.

Authors:  Luoyijun Xie; Ruxiao Huang; Shuang Liu; Weijia Wu; Ailing Su; Runkai Li; Xu Liu; Yiting Lei; Huidi Sun; Xinguang Liu; Shun Xu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Regional Gene Repression by DNA Double-Strand Breaks in G1 Phase Cells.

Authors:  Caitlin E Purman; Patrick L Collins; Sofia I Porter; Ankita Saini; Harshath Gupta; Barry P Sleckman; Eugene M Oltz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Non-homologous end-joining protein expression screen from radiosensitive cancer patients yields a novel DNA double strand break repair phenotype.

Authors:  Michael J McKay; Su Kak Goh; Jeremy N McKay; Michael Chao; Timothy M McKay
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

6.  STING protects breast cancer cells from intrinsic and genotoxic-induced DNA instability via a non-canonical, cell-autonomous pathway.

Authors:  Stefano Cairo; Vincent Goffin; Laura Cheradame; Ida Chiara Guerrera; Julie Gaston; Alain Schmitt; Vincent Jung; Nicolas Goudin; Marion Pouillard; Nina Radosevic-Robin; Mauro Modesti; Jean-Gabriel Judde
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Chromatin regulators and their impact on DNA repair and G2 checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  Veronique A J Smits; Ignacio Alonso-de Vega; Daniël O Warmerdam
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Formation of correlated chromatin domains at nanoscale dynamic resolution during transcription.

Authors:  Haitham A Shaban; Roman Barth; Kerstin Bystricky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  A meeting at risk: Unrepaired DSBs go for broke.

Authors:  Aude Guénolé; Gaëlle Legube
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.197

Review 10.  R-loops as Janus-faced modulators of DNA repair.

Authors:  Aline Marnef; Gaëlle Legube
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 28.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.