| Literature DB >> 28067808 |
Raúl Domínguez1, Eduardo Cuenca2, José Luis Maté-Muñoz3, Pablo García-Fernández4, Noemí Serra-Paya5, María Carmen Lozano Estevan6, Pablo Veiga Herreros7, Manuel Vicente Garnacho-Castaño8.
Abstract
Athletes use nutritional supplementation to enhance the effects of training and achieve improvements in their athletic performance. Beetroot juice increases levels of nitric oxide (NO), which serves multiple functions related to increased blood flow, gas exchange, mitochondrial biogenesis and efficiency, and strengthening of muscle contraction. These biomarker improvements indicate that supplementation with beetroot juice could have ergogenic effects on cardiorespiratory endurance that would benefit athletic performance. The aim of this literature review was to determine the effects of beetroot juice supplementation and the combination of beetroot juice with other supplements on cardiorespiratory endurance in athletes. A keyword search of DialNet, MedLine, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases covered publications from 2010 to 2016. After excluding reviews/meta-analyses, animal studies, inaccessible full-text, and studies that did not supplement with beetroot juice and adequately assess cardiorespiratory endurance, 23 articles were selected for analysis. The available results suggest that supplementation with beetroot juice can improve cardiorespiratory endurance in athletes by increasing efficiency, which improves performance at various distances, increases time to exhaustion at submaximal intensities, and may improve the cardiorespiratory performance at anaerobic threshold intensities and maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max). Although the literature shows contradictory data, the findings of other studies lead us to hypothesize that supplementing with beetroot juice could mitigate the ergolytic effects of hypoxia on cardiorespiratory endurance in athletes. It cannot be stated that the combination of beetroot juice with other supplements has a positive or negative effect on cardiorespiratory endurance, but it is possible that the effects of supplementation with beetroot juice can be undermined by interaction with other supplements such as caffeine.Entities:
Keywords: exercise; nitric oxide; nutrition; physical activity; sport
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28067808 PMCID: PMC5295087 DOI: 10.3390/nu9010043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Classification of nutritional supplements, based on performance effect. Adapted from Australian Institute of Sport [9] and Burke [11].
| Category | Sub-Categories | Supplements |
|---|---|---|
| High level of evidence | Will improve athletic performance with adequate dosing and specific types of effort | β-alanine |
| Sodium bicarbonate | ||
| Caffeine | ||
| Creatinine | ||
| Beetroot juice | ||
| Moderate level of evidence | May improve performance, under specific dosing and effort conditions, although additional research is needed | Fish oils |
| Carnitine | ||
| Curcumin | ||
| Glucosamine | ||
| Glutamine | ||
| HMB | ||
| Quercetin | ||
| Vitamins C and E | ||
| Tart cherry juice | ||
| Low level of evidence | No demonstrated beneficial effects | Supplements not found in other categories |
| Prohibited supplements | May result in positive doping tests and therefore are prohibited | Substances on the list published annually by the |
Figure 1Pathway of nitric oxide (NO) production from beetroot juice supplementation. Nitrate (NO3−) is reduced to nitrite (NO2−) by anaerobic bacteria in the oral cavity and then to NO in the stomach. NO3− and remaining NO2− are absorbed from the intestine into the circulation, which can become bioactive NO in tissues and blood. NO induces several physiological functions improving skeletal muscle function and, consequently, increasing cardiorespiratory performance.
Figure 2Flowchart of article selection.
Summary of studies that have evaluated the performance or metabolic responses after supplementation protocol with beet juice.
| Reference | Participants | Experimental Conditions | Supplementation Protocol | Variables | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | M ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | EC1: beet juice (8 mmol nitrate) (90 min before) | Test 5 km: Performance, HR, RPE | Performance: Last mile 1.1: faster EC1 vs. EC2 (5%), RPE: 1 mile: lower in EC1 vs. EC2 |
| [ | M, competitive cyclists ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | EC1: 500 mL beet juice (6.2 mmol nitrate) (120 min before) | Tests 4 km and 16 km: respiratory parameters, performance | Performance in test 4 km: Time: lower in EC1 vs. EC2 (6.27 ± 0.35 vs. 6.45 ± 0.42 min), Power: Higher in EC1 vs. EC2 (292 ± 44 vs. 279 ± 51 W), W/VO2: Higher in EC1 vs. EC2 (93 ± 17 vs. 83 ± 9 W/L/min), Performance test of 16 km: Time: lower in EC1 vs. EC2 (26.9 ± 1.8 vs. 27.7 ± 2.1 min), Power: Higher in EC1 vs. EC2 (247 ± 44 vs. 233 ± 43 W), W/VO2: Higher in EC1 vs. EC2 (69 ± 3 vs. 64 ± 6 W/L/min) |
| [ | M, national level athletes kayak ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | Study A: EC1: 140 mL beet juice (4.8 mmol nitrate) (150 min before), Study B: EC1: 140 mL beet juice (9.6 mmol nitrate) (150 min before) | Study A: kayaking incremental test: Test 10 min (10 min + 5 min LT1 LT2) + 4 min test: respiratory parameters, lactate, performance (test 4 min), HR, RPE. Study B: Test 500 m | Study A: 4 min test: VO2: decreases in EC1 vs. EC2 (46.87 ± 2.56 vs. 47.83 ± 2.77 mL/kg/min), Economy: improved EC1 vs. EC2 (189.67 ± 8.17 vs. 193.90 ± 8.17 mL/kg/km). Study B: Test 500 m: Time: improved EC1 vs. EC2 (114.6 + 1.5 s vs. 116.7 + 2.2 s), Rowing often partially 100–400 m: increases in EC1 vs. EC2 (108 + 2 vs. 105 + 2 strokes), Partial speed 100–400 m: increases in EC1 vs. EC2 (4.40 + 0.03 vs. 4.30 + 0.05 m/s) |
| [ | M, trained cyclists-triathletes ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | EC1: beet juice 140 mL (8 mmol nitrate) (6 days) | Test 30 min at 45% MAP + 30 min at 65% MAP + test 10 km: respiratory parameters, lactate, glucose, performance (test to exhaustion at 80% VO2max), HR, RPE | Respiratory parameters VO2 at 45% MAP: lower in EC1 vs. EC2 (1.93 ± 0.05 vs. 2.0 ± 0.07 L/min), VO2 at 65% MAP: lower in EC1 vs. EC2 (2.94 ± 0.10 vs. 3.1 ± 0.09 L/min), Performance (test 10 km): improvement in EC1 vs. EC2 (953 ± 21 vs. 965 ± 21 s) |
| [ | M, trained athletes ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | EC1: 280 mL of beet juice (6.5 mmol nitrate) for 7 days. EC2: Control | Test 20 min (10 min to 10 min 50% + 70% VO2max): respiratory parameters | Respiratory parameters: 70% VO2max: oxygen consumption decrease in EC1 (3%) |
| [ | M, trained cyclists ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | EC1: 500 mL beet juice (6.2 mmol nitrate) (150 min before) | Test 50 miles: respiratory parameters, lactate, performance | Performance: last 10 miles: lower time in EC1 vs. EC2, W/VO2: higher in EC1 vs. EC2 (67.4 ± 5.5 vs. 65.3 ± 4.8 W/L/min) |
| [ | M, trained athletes ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | EC1: 450 mL beet juice (5 mmol nitrate) (115 min before) | Test 40 min [20 min at 50% VO2max + 20 min at 70% VO2max] + time to exhaustion at 90% VO2max: respiratory parameters, performance (test to exhaustion at 90% VO2max), lactate, HR, RPE | Respiratory parameters: RER: greater in EC1 vs. EC2 at 50% VO2max (0.89 ± 0.03 vs. 0.86 ± 0.06) and test to exhaustion (1.04 ± 0.06 vs. 1.01 ± 0.06), Performance (test to exhaustion at 90% VO2max): time increases in EC1 vs. EC2 (185 ± 122 s vs. 160 ± 109 s), Max lactate: Higher in EC1 vs. EC2 (8.80 ± 2.10 vs. 7.90 ± 2.30 mmol/L) |
| [ | M, kayakers ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | CE1: beet juice 70 mL (5 mmol nitrate) (180 min before) | Test 15 min at 60% MAP + 5 × 10 s. R: 50 s + 5 min recovery + Test 1 km kayak: respiratory parameters, performance (5 × 10 s) performance (1 km time trial), HR | Test 15 min at 60% MAP: respiratory parameters: VO2 lower in EC1 vs. EC2 (35.6 ± 2.5 vs. 36.8 ± 2.4 mL/kg/min), Test 1 km: respiratory parameters: VO2 lower in EC1 vs. EC2 (results not specified) |
| [ | M, trained athletes ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | EC1: 500 mL beet juice (8.2 mmol nitrate) | Tests to exhaustion at 60%, 70%, 80% and 100% VO2max: respiratory parameters, lactate, performance, HR | Performance: 60% VO2max: EC1 more time to exhaustion vs. EC2 (696 ± 120 vs. 593 ± 68 s), 70% VO2max: EC1 more time to exhaustion vs. EC2 (452 ± 106 vs. 390 ± 86 s), 80% VO2max: EC1 more time to exhaustion vs. EC2 (294 ± 50 vs. 263 ± 50 s) |
| [ | M ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | EC1: beet juice 500 mL (5.2 mmol nitrate) (15 days) | Test 5 min at 90% VT 1 + incremental test: respiratory parameters, lactate, performance, HR, glucose | Respiratory parameters: Test 5 min at 90% VT1 (day 15): VO2 lower in EC1 vs. EC2 (1.37 ± 0.23 vs. 1.43 ± 0.23 L/min), Incremental test: Wpeak: Higher EC1 vs. EC2 (331 ± 68 vs. 323 ± 68 W), WVT1: Higher EC1 vs. EC2 (105 ± 28 vs. 84 ± 18 W) |
| [ | M ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | EC1: beet juice 140 mL (8 mmol nitrate) (6 days) | Test 4 min at 90% VT1 + test to exhaustion at 70% between VT1 and VO2max: respiratory parameters, lactate, performance (test to exhaustion at 70% between VT1 and VO2max), HR | Performance (test to exhaustion at 70% between VT1 and VO2max) higher EC1 vs. EC2 (635 ± 258 vs. 521 ± 158 s) |
| [ | M, trained swimmers ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: placebo | EC1: beet juice 500 mL (5.5 mmol nitrate) (6 days), EC2: placebo (6 days) | Incremental test in swimming | VT1: improvement in EC1 vs. EC2 (6.7 ± 1.2 vs. 6.3 ± 1.0 kg), energy expenditure: decreases in EC1 vs. EC2 (1.7 ± 0.3 vs. 1.9 ± 0.5 kcal/kg/h) |
| [ | M, trained cyclists-triathletes ( | EC1: hypoxia (2500 m) + beet juice, EC2: hypoxia (2500 m) + placebo | EC1: beet juice 70 mL (5 mmol nitrate) (150–180 min before) | Test 15 min at 60% VO2max + test of 16.1 km in hypoxia (2500 m): respiratory parameters, lactate, performance (16.1 km time trial) | Test 15 min at 60% VO2max: respiratory parameters: VO2 lower in EC1 vs. EC2 (improvement unspecified), performance (16.1 km time trial): Time: improved EC1 vs. EC2 (1664 ± 14 vs. 1716 ± 17 s), Power: improved EC1 vs. EC2 (224 ± 6 vs. 216 ± 6 W) |
| [ | M, trained cyclists ( | EC1: normoxia + beet juice, EC2: normoxia + placebo, EC3: hypoxia (2500 m) + beet juice, EC4: hypoxia (2500 m) + placebo | EC1: beet juice 70 mL (6.5 mmol nitrate) (120 min before), EC3: beet juice 70 mL (6.5 mmol nitrate) (120 min before) | Test 15 min 50% + test MAP 10 km: respiratory parameters, performance (10 km), HR | No differences in analyzed variables |
| [ | M, trained runners ( | EC1: beet juice (n: 5), EC2: placebo (n: 5) | EC1: beet juice 70 mL (7 mmol nitrate) (150 min before) | Incremental test in hypoxia (4000 m). Test of 10 km in hypoxia (2500 m) | No differences between variables |
| [ | M, trained athletes ( | EC1: acute beet juice, EC2: acute placebo, EC1: chronic beet juice, EC2: chronic placebo | EC1: 210 mL beet juice (6.5 mmol nitrate) (150 min before), EC2: placebo (150 min before), EC1: 210 mL beet juice (6.5 mmol nitrate) (8 days), EC2: placebo (8 days) | 19 min test (7 min 50% VO2max + 7 min at 65% VO2max + 5 min at 80% VO2max) + test of 1500 m: respiratory parameters (test 19 min), performance (test 1500 m) | No significant differences between experimental conditions |
| [ | M, trained athletes ( | EC1: normoxia + beet juice, EC2: normoxia placebo, EC3: hypoxia (2500 m) + beet juice, EC4: hypoxia (2500 m) | EC1: beet juice 140 mL (8.4 mmol nitrate) (3 days), EC3: beet juice 140 mL (8.4 mmol nitrate) (3 days) | Test 5 min to 80% VT1 + 5 min to 75% between VT1 and VO2max + time to exhaustion at 75% between VT1 and VO2max: respiratory parameters, performance, HR | Respiratory parameters (5 min at 80% VT1): VO2: lower in EC3 vs. EC4, performance (time to exhaustion at 75% between VT1 and VO2max): higher in EC3 vs. EC4 (214 ± 14 vs. 197 ± 28 s) |
| [ | M, trained athletes ( | EC1: normoxia + chronic beet juice, EC2: normoxia + placebo, EC3: hypoxia (5000 m) + chronic beet juice, EC4: hypoxia (5000 m) + placebo | EC1: beet juice 500 mL (0.7 mmol nitrate/kg) (6 days), EC3: 70 mL beet juice (0.7 mmol nitrate/kg) (6 days) | Test 20 min at 45% VO2max + incremental test: respiratory parameters, lactate, performance, HR, RPE | Test 20 min at 45% VO2max: VO2: lower in EC3 vs. EC4 at rest (8%) and exercise (4%), Incremental test: time to exhaustion: higher EC2 vs. EC4 (527 ± 22 vs. 568 ± 23 s), Max. lactate: lower in EC1 vs. EC2 (9.1 ± 0.5 vs. 10.6 ± 0.3 mmol/L) |
| [ | M, trained athletes ( | EC1: beet juice + caffeine, EC2: caffeine + placebo, EC3: beet juice + placebo, EC4: placebo | EC1: 140 mL beet juice (8 mmol nitrate) (90 min before) + 5 mg·kg−1 of caffeine (60 min before), EC2: 5 mg·kg−1 of caffeine (40 min before), EC3: 2 × 70 mL beet juice (8 mmol nitrate) (90 min before) | Test 30 min 60% + test to exhaustion at 80% VO2max: respiratory parameters, performance (test to exhaustion at 80% VO2max), HR, RPE, cortisol | RPE: lower at 15 min in test to exhaustion at 80% VO2max in EC1 (17 ± 1) vs. EC2 (18 ± 1) and EC4 (19 ± 2) |
| [ | W, trained cyclists and triathletes ( | EC1: beet juice + caffeine, EC2: caffeine + placebo, EC3: beet juice + placebo, EC4: placebo | EC1: beet juice 70 mL (7.3 mmol nitrate) (150 min before) + 5 mg·kg−1 of caffeine (60 min before), EC2: 5 mg·kg−1 of caffeine (60 min before), EC3: beet juice 70 mL (7.3 mmol nitrate) (150 min before) | Test of 20 km: respiratory parameters, lactate, performance, HR, RPE | Respiratory parameters: RER: EC2 vs. EC3 (+0.034) and EC4 (+0.033), lactate: EC2 vs. EC3 (+2.28 mmol/L) and EC4 (+2.04 mmol/L) and EC1 vs. EC3 (+2.74 mmol/L) and EC4 (+2.50 mmol/L), Performance: power: EC2 vs. EC3 improvement (+10.3 W) and EC4 (+10.4 W), time: improved EC2 vs. EC3 (+42.4 s) and EC3 (+45.1 s), HR: EC1 vs. EC2 vs. (+8.0 bpm), EC3 (+ 5.2 bpm) and EC4 (+ 6.5 bpm) |
| [ | M ( | EC1: beet juice + caffeine, EC2: caffeine + placebo, EC3: beet juice + placebo, EC4: placebo | EC1: 140 mL beet juice (8.4 mmol nitrate) (8–12 h before) + 3 mg·kg−1 of caffeine (60 min before), EC2: 3 mg·kg−1 of caffeine (40 min before), EC3: 140 mL beet juice (8.4 mmol nitrate) (8–12 h before) | Test of 43.83 km M and 29.35 km W: performance, HR, RPE | Performance: power: improvement in EC1 (258 ± 59 W) and EC2 (260 ± 58 W) vs. EC4 (250 ± 57 W), M time: improvement EC1 (1:02:38 ± 0:03:31 h:min:s) and EC2 (1:02:43 ± 0:03:04 h:min:s) vs. EC4 (1:03: 30 ± 0:03:16 h:min:s), W time: improving EC1 (0: 51: 1 ± 0:02:22 h:min:s) and EC2 (0:50:50 ± 0:02:56 h:min:s) vs. EC4 (0:51: 40 ± 0:02:31 h:min:s) in W |
| [ | M, trained athletes ( | EC1: Beet juice ( | 6 weeks: EC1: 500 mL beet juice (5.8 mmol nitrate, approximately) + training in hypoxia (4000 m), EC2: placebo + hypoxia training (4000 m) | Progressive incremental test 30 min test: respiratory parameters, lactate, muscle glycogen, performance, HR | Incremental test: VO2max: improvement in EC1 60.1 ± 2.6 vs. 65.6 ± 2.1 L/min) and EC2 (60.8 ± 1.8 vs. 63.8 ± 1.6 L/min), HRmax: EC1 vs. EC2 lower in (186 ± 3 vs. 197 ± 2 lpm), Max Lactate: EC1 vs. EC2 lower in (10.4 ± 0.7 vs. 11.8 ± 0.4 mmol/L), W at 4 mmol/L lactate: improvement in EC1 (215 ± 10 vs. 252 ± 9 W) and EC2 (204 ± 12 vs. 231 ± 10 W), 30 min test: performance: Pmean increases in EC1 (215 ± 10 vs. 252 ± 9 W) and EC2 (204 ± 12 vs. 231 ± 10 W) |
| [ | M, trained athletes ( | EC1: beet juice, EC2: beet juice + Mouthwash with carbohydrates, EC3: placebo | EC1: 140 mL of beet juice (8 mmol nitrate) (150 min before), EC2: beet juice 140 mL (8 mmol nitrate) + mouthwash carbohydrates (150 min before) | Test 60 min at 65% VO2max: respiratory parameters, lactate, glucose, insulin, muscle glycogen, ATP, creatine | Lactate: increased EC1, EC2 and EC3. No differences between groups. Muscle glycogen: decline in EC1, EC2 and EC3. No differences between groups Creatine decline in EC1, EC2 and EC3. No differences between groups |
ATP: adenosine triphosphate; EC: experimental condition; HR: heart rate; M: men; h: hours; kg: kilograms; km: kilometers; bpm: beats per minute; m: meter; min: minutes; mL: milliliter; MAP: maximal aerobic power; RER: respiratory exchange rate; RPE: subjective perception of effort; s: sec; VT1: first ventilatory threshold; VO2: oxygen consumption; VO2max: maximal oxygen consumption; W: Watt. All results presented reflect statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). * Studies where only the effect of beet juice vs. placebo in both hypoxic situations as compared normoxic condition.