Xin Zhang1, Yukun Kuang2, Yuan Zhang3, Kai He4, Noah Lechtzin5, Mingying Zeng5, Rex C Yung6, Canmao Xie2. 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China;; Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA;; Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China. 2. Department of Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China;; Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China. 3. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA;; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200433, China. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 6. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA;; Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Towson, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopies are extensively adopted for diagnosing and staging thoracic malignancies, but studies are missing as how to keep the process streamlined and more efficient. To evaluate current role of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for cancer and possible infection diagnosis when practicing comprehensive bronchoscopy for patients suspected with thoracic malignancy, and provide foundation for possible practice modification. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively kept database of immunocompetent patients undergoing bronchoscopy for suspected non-hematologic malignancies. Clinical, radiographic data, bronchoscopic sampling techniques and diagnostic results were recorded. Initially undiagnostic patients were followed up for 2 years for a definitive diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 224 patients included, 179 (79.9%) were confirmed with active thoracic malignancies. BAL diagnostic yield of cancer based on different radiographic characters of target lesion are as follow: isolated lymphadenopathies 0%, central lesions 45.5%, peripheral masses (diameter ≥3 cm) 21.4%, peripheral large nodules (2≤ diameter <3 cm) 15.8%, and peripheral small nodules (diameter <2 cm) 7.1%, while composite bronchoscopy achieved diagnostic yield of 93.3%, 95.5%, 91.7%, 76.9%, and 66.7% in corresponding lesion types. No cancer was diagnosed solely by BAL-cytology. Proportions of patients with positive BAL culture did not differ significantly between patients with and without pre-test suspicion for infections (P=0.199). In multivariable analysis, infections were associated with age ≥75 (OR 3.0; 95% CI: 1.29-7.06), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 2.7; 95% CI: 1.14-6.26) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR 4.5; 95% CI: 1.90-10.44). CONCLUSIONS: Omitting BAL cytology in settings of comprehensive bronchoscopy may not compromise cancer diagnosis. For patients primarily suspected with thoracic malignancy, performing BAL culture only based on clinical suspicion could miss important infectious etiology.
BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopies are extensively adopted for diagnosing and staging thoracic malignancies, but studies are missing as how to keep the process streamlined and more efficient. To evaluate current role of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for cancer and possible infection diagnosis when practicing comprehensive bronchoscopy for patients suspected with thoracic malignancy, and provide foundation for possible practice modification. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively kept database of immunocompetent patients undergoing bronchoscopy for suspected non-hematologic malignancies. Clinical, radiographic data, bronchoscopic sampling techniques and diagnostic results were recorded. Initially undiagnostic patients were followed up for 2 years for a definitive diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 224 patients included, 179 (79.9%) were confirmed with active thoracic malignancies. BAL diagnostic yield of cancer based on different radiographic characters of target lesion are as follow: isolated lymphadenopathies 0%, central lesions 45.5%, peripheral masses (diameter ≥3 cm) 21.4%, peripheral large nodules (2≤ diameter <3 cm) 15.8%, and peripheral small nodules (diameter <2 cm) 7.1%, while composite bronchoscopy achieved diagnostic yield of 93.3%, 95.5%, 91.7%, 76.9%, and 66.7% in corresponding lesion types. No cancer was diagnosed solely by BAL-cytology. Proportions of patients with positive BAL culture did not differ significantly between patients with and without pre-test suspicion for infections (P=0.199). In multivariable analysis, infections were associated with age ≥75 (OR 3.0; 95% CI: 1.29-7.06), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 2.7; 95% CI: 1.14-6.26) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR 4.5; 95% CI: 1.90-10.44). CONCLUSIONS: Omitting BAL cytology in settings of comprehensive bronchoscopy may not compromise cancer diagnosis. For patients primarily suspected with thoracic malignancy, performing BAL culture only based on clinical suspicion could miss important infectious etiology.
Authors: Keith C Meyer; Ganesh Raghu; Robert P Baughman; Kevin K Brown; Ulrich Costabel; Roland M du Bois; Marjolein Drent; Patricia L Haslam; Dong Soon Kim; Sonoko Nagai; Paola Rottoli; Cesare Saltini; Moisés Selman; Charlie Strange; Brent Wood Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: I A Du Rand; J Blaikley; R Booton; N Chaudhuri; V Gupta; S Khalid; S Mandal; J Martin; J Mills; N Navani; N M Rahman; J M Wrightson; M Munavvar Journal: Thorax Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: David S Ettinger; Wallace Akerley; Hossein Borghaei; Andrew C Chang; Richard T Cheney; Lucian R Chirieac; Thomas A D'Amico; Todd L Demmy; Ramaswamy Govindan; Frederic W Grannis; Stefan C Grant; Leora Horn; Thierry M Jahan; Ritsuko Komaki; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Mark G Kris; Lee M Krug; Rudy P Lackner; Inga T Lennes; Billy W Loo; Renato Martins; Gregory A Otterson; Jyoti D Patel; Mary C Pinder-Schenck; Katherine M Pisters; Karen Reckamp; Gregory J Riely; Eric Rohren; Theresa A Shapiro; Scott J Swanson; Kurt Tauer; Douglas E Wood; Stephen C Yang; Kristina Gregory; Miranda Hughes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: N A Maskell; D J Waine; A Lindley; J C T Pepperell; A E Wakefield; R F Miller; R J O Davies Journal: Thorax Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Neal Navani; James M Brown; Matthew Nankivell; Ian Woolhouse; Richard N Harrison; Vandana Jeebun; Mohammed Munavvar; Benjamin J Ng; Doris M Rassl; Mary Falzon; Gabrijela Kocjan; Robert C Rintoul; Andrew G Nicholson; Sam M Janes Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 21.405