Literature DB >> 1643916

Bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of peripheral, primary lung cancer.

M Pirozynski1.   

Abstract

Numerous case reports have shown the advantage of using bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in cytologic diagnosis of primary and secondary malignant neoplasms of the respiratory system. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of BAL in the diagnosis of peripheral, primary lung cancer. Of 1,864 patients referred to the Bronchological Department for endoscopic examination, 145 patients were studied: six with large cell lung cancer, 22 with adenocarcinoma, 15 with alveolar cell lung cancer, 40 with small cell lung cancer, and 62 with squamous cell lung cancer. In 94 patients (64.8 percent), BAL was diagnostic, revealing malignant cells. In 52 (35.9 percent) of these patients, the cytologic diagnosis agreed with the final pathologic diagnosis of the resected tumor. The result of BAL was affected by the type of cancer and size of the tumor. Highest yields were seen in adenocarcinoma (59.2 percent) and alveolar cell lung cancer (80 percent). The average size of the tumor in the group with correct cell typing was 4.9 +/- 1.8 cm; in patients with nondiagnostic BAL, the average size was 2.6 +/- 1.2 cm. BAL provided the highest (statistically significant, p less than 0.05) diagnostic yield (64.8 percent) in comparison with other sampling techniques: brush biopsy (29.8 percent), catheter biopsy (26.8 percent), and forceps biopsy (32.7 percent). The diagnostic yield of BAL and transbronchial fine needle aspiration biopsy (58.3 percent) did not significantly differ. BAL proved to be a valuable diagnostic tool in detecting peripheral, primary, pulmonary malignant neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1643916     DOI: 10.1378/chest.102.2.372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  7 in total

1.  Transbronchial Catheter Aspiration and Transbronchial Needle Aspiration in the Diagnostic Workup of Peripheral Lung Lesions.

Authors:  Karl-Josef Franke; Melanie Hein; Ulrike Domanski; Georg Nilius; Maik Schroeder; Jeremias Wohlschlaeger; Dirk Theegarten
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  Shifted focus of bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with suspected thoracic malignancy: an analysis of 224 patients.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Yukun Kuang; Yuan Zhang; Kai He; Noah Lechtzin; Mingying Zeng; Rex C Yung; Canmao Xie
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Lung Cancer: A Bronchoscopic Approach.

Authors:  János Strausz
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.201

4.  Diagnostic yield of non-guided flexible bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary neoplasia.

Authors:  Catherine Labbé; Stéphane Beaudoin; Simon Martel; Antoine Delage; Philippe Joubert; Christine Drapeau; Steeve Provencher
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Comparative study of bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial brushing, and FNAC in diagnosing malignant neoplasms of lungs.

Authors:  Vijeta Tomar; N Vijay; P Nuwal; R Dixit
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Predictors of diagnostic yield in bronchoscopy: a retrospective cohort study comparing different combinations of sampling techniques.

Authors:  Kjetil Roth; Jon A Hardie; Alf H Andreassen; Friedemann Leh; Tomas Ml Eagan
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.317

7.  Bronchial wash cytology: A study on morphology and morphometry.

Authors:  Shalinee Rao; Shivani Rao; Archana Lal; Gunabooshanam Barathi; Thangaswamy Dhanasekar; Prathiba Duvuru
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.000

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.