Literature DB >> 28066052

PREVENTING THE CHROMOSOMAL TRANSLOCATIONS THAT CAUSE CANCER.

Robert Hromas1, Elizabeth Williamson1, Suk-Hee Lee1, Jac Nickoloff1.   

Abstract

Approximately half of all cancers harbor chromosomal translocations that can either contribute to their origin or govern their subsequent behavior. Chromosomal translocations by definition can only occur when there are two DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) on distinct chromosomes that are repaired heterologously. Thus, chromosomal translocations are by their very nature problems of DNA DSB repair. Such DNA DSBs can be from internal or external sources. Internal sources of DNA DSBs that can lead to translocations can occur are inappropriate immune receptor gene maturation during V(D)J recombination or heavy-chain switching. Other internal DNA DSBs can come from aberrant DNA structures, or are generated at collapsed and reversed replication forks. External sources of DNA DSBs that can generate chromosomal translocations are ionizing radiation and cancer chemotherapy. There are several known nuclear and chromatin properties that enhance translocations over homologous chromosome DSB repair. The proximity of the region of the heterologous chromosomes to each other increases translocation rates. Histone methylation events at the DSB also influence translocation frequencies. There are four DNA DSB repair pathways, but it appears that only one, alternative non-homologous end-joining (a-NHEJ) can mediate chromosomal translocations. The rate-limiting, initial step of a-NHEJ is the binding of poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1) to the DSB. In our investigation of methods for preventing oncogenic translocations, we discovered that PARP1 was required for translocations. Significantly, the clinically approved PARP1 inhibitors can block the formation of chromosomal translocations, raising the possibility for the first time that secondary oncogenic translocations can be reduced in high risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28066052      PMCID: PMC5216476     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc        ISSN: 0065-7778


  94 in total

1.  Regions of genomic instability on 22q11 and 11q23 as the etiology for the recurrent constitutional t(11;22).

Authors:  H Kurahashi; T H Shaikh; P Hu; B A Roe; B S Emanuel; M L Budarf
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  MLL: a histone methyltransferase disrupted in leukemia.

Authors:  Jay L Hess
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 11.951

3.  ATM regulates Mre11-dependent DNA end-degradation and microhomology-mediated end joining.

Authors:  Elias A Rahal; Leigh A Henricksen; Yuling Li; R Scott Williams; John A Tainer; Kathleen Dixon
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Targeting signaling pathways in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: new insights.

Authors:  Christine J Harrison
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2013

Review 5.  Induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks: the increasing spectrum of non-homologous end joining pathways.

Authors:  Emil Mladenov; George Iliakis
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  SIRT6 promotes DNA repair under stress by activating PARP1.

Authors:  Zhiyong Mao; Christopher Hine; Xiao Tian; Michael Van Meter; Matthew Au; Amita Vaidya; Andrei Seluanov; Vera Gorbunova
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability.

Authors:  Alessia Errico; Vincenzo Costanzo
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 8.250

8.  Topoisomerase IIalpha maintains genomic stability through decatenation G(2) checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  J J Bower; G F Karaca; Y Zhou; D A Simpson; M Cordeiro-Stone; W K Kaufmann
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) deficiency causes the autosomal recessive form of the Hyper-IgM syndrome (HIGM2).

Authors:  P Revy; T Muto; Y Levy; F Geissmann; A Plebani; O Sanal; N Catalan; M Forveille; R Dufourcq-Labelouse; A Gennery; I Tezcan; F Ersoy; H Kayserili; A G Ugazio; N Brousse; M Muramatsu; L D Notarangelo; K Kinoshita; T Honjo; A Fischer; A Durandy
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Pathway choice in DNA double strand break repair: observations of a balancing act.

Authors:  Inger Brandsma; Dik C Gent
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2012-11-27
View more
  5 in total

1.  Frequent homozygous deletions of the CDKN2A locus in somatic cancer tissues.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Hamid; Beniamin Petreaca; Ruben Petreaca
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Secondary structure forming sequences drive SD-MMEJ repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Varandt Y Khodaverdian; Terrence Hanscom; Amy Marie Yu; Taylor L Yu; Victoria Mak; Alexander J Brown; Steven A Roberts; Mitch McVey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Screening of Pesticides with the Potential of Inducing DSB and Successive Recombinational Repair.

Authors:  Karen Suárez-Larios; Ana-María Salazar-Martínez; Regina Montero-Montoya
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2017-10-10

4.  Lack of associations between LIG3 gene polymorphisms and neuroblastoma susceptibility in Chinese children.

Authors:  Jiwen Cheng; Kongmei Wei; Yijuan Xin; Pu Zhao; Jiao Zhang; Wei Jia; Baijun Zheng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 5.  Metnase and EEPD1: DNA Repair Functions and Potential Targets in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Jac A Nickoloff; Neelam Sharma; Lynn Taylor; Sage J Allen; Suk-Hee Lee; Robert Hromas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.