| Literature DB >> 28065164 |
Maik Pietzner1,2, Beatrice Engelmann3, Tim Kacprowski2,3, Janine Golchert3, Anna-Luise Dirk4, Elke Hammer2,3, K Alexander Iwen4, Matthias Nauck1,2, Henri Wallaschofski1,5, Dagmar Führer6, Thomas F Münte7, Nele Friedrich1,2,8, Uwe Völker2,3,9, Georg Homuth10,11, Georg Brabant12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Determinations of thyrotropin (TSH) and free thyroxine (FT4) represent the gold standard in evaluation of thyroid function. To screen for novel peripheral biomarkers of thyroid function and to characterize FT4-associated physiological signatures in human plasma we used an untargeted OMICS approach in a thyrotoxicosis model.Entities:
Keywords: Hyperthyroidism; Metabolomics; Proteomics; Thyroid function; Thyrotoxicosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28065164 PMCID: PMC5220622 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0770-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 8.775
Fig. 1a Study design including sampling time points as well as duration of levothyroxine (L-T4) treatment. b Boxplots with mean values (diamonds) of serum TSH (white) and FT4 (grey) for each time point. bas baseline, w4(T4)/w8(T4) 4 and 8 weeks of levothyroxine treatment, w12/w16 4 and 8 weeks after stopping the application point
Clinical characteristics of participants during the study period
| Characteristics | baseline | 4 weeks (L-T4)a | 8 weeks (L-T4)a | 12 weeks | 16 weeks | β (SD)b | Logc |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 27.8 (3.8) | 27.8 (3.8) | 27.8 (3.8) | 27.8 (3.8) | 27.8 (3.8) | – | – | – |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.1 (2.4) | 24.1 (2.4) | 24.1 (2.4) | 24.1 (2.4) | 24.1 (2.4) | – | – | – |
| FT4, pmol/L | 13.2 (1.4) | 28.6 (6.5) | 25.9 (5.7) | 11.5 (1.5) | 12.8 (1.5) | – | – | <0.001e |
| FT3, pmol/L | 5.27 (0.51) | 9.19 (2.01) | 8.92 (2.25) | 4.61 (0.33) | 4.86 (0.55) | 2.76 × 10–1 (8.22 × 10–3) | no | 7.43 × 10–25 (4.28 × 10–24)f |
| TSH, mU/L | 2.104 (1.017) | 0.017 (0.029) | 0.007 (0.007) | 2.298 (1.309) | 2.177 (0.897) | –1.35 × 10–1 (6.42 × 10–3) | yes | 7.26 × 10–21 (2.02 × 10–20)f |
| SHBG, nmol/L | 30.2 (10.2) | 50.6 (16.2) | 55.9 (16.3) | 36.3 (11.8) | 29.3 (9.3) | 1.41 × 10–2 (9.11 × 10–4) | yes | 3.41 × 10–10 (1.03 × 10–9)f |
| Cystatin C, mg/L | 0.68 (0.06) | 0.79 (0.08) | 0.86 (0.12) | 0.71 (0.07) | 0.68 (0.06) | 4.19 × 10–3 (2.35 × 10–4) | yes | 8.26 × 10–9 (1.10 × 10–8)f |
| Serum glucose, mmol/L | 5.18 (0.35) | 5.22 (0.42) | 5.26 (0.39) | 5.09 (0.31) | 5.18 (0.57) | 5.76 × 10–3 (1.62 × 10–3) | no | 2.91 × 10–1 (1.38 × 10–1) |
| Insulin, μU/L | 8.35 (3.63) | 7.94 (4.32) | 7.78 (3.62) | 8.33 (4.06) | 8.07 (3.38) | –1.29 × 10–3 (1.14 × 10–3) | yes | 6.58 × 10–1 (2.29 × 10–1) |
| HDL-cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.43 (0.27) | 1.21 (0.20) | 1.23 (0.25) | 1.46 (0.29) | 1.42 (0.37) | –1.30 × 10–2 (8.89 × 10–4) | no | 1.33 × 10–5 (1.54 × 10–5)f |
| LDL-cholesterol, mmol/L | 2.70 (0.72) | 2.15 (0.57) | 2.27 (0.53) | 2.91 (0.75) | 2.76 (0.79) | –4.18 × 10–2 (1.96 × 10–3) | no | 2.91 × 10–8 (6.08 × 10–8)f |
| Cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.53 (0.75) | 3.81 (0.61) | 4.06 (0.61) | 5.04 (0.70) | 4.61 (0.68) | –5.87 × 10–2 (2.24 × 10–3) | no | 3.05 × 10–10 (6.84 × 10–10)f |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.26 (0.76) | 1.14 (0.58) | 1.29 (0.56) | 1.31 (0.63) | 1.35 (0.82) | –1.96 × 10–3 (6.06 × 10–4) | yes | 3.08 × 10–1 (1.65 × 10–1) |
| ALT, μkatal/L | 0.51 (0.21) | 0.38 (0.10) | 0.65 (0.42) | 0.61 (0.29) | 0.50 (0.14) | –4.30 × 10–3 (9.65 × 10–4) | yes | 9.99 × 10–2 (7.00 × 10–2) |
| AST, μkatal/L | 0.49 (0.41) | 0.34 (0.14) | 0.43 (0.17) | 0.43 (0.14) | 0.43 (0.23) | –2.03 × 10–3 (1.30 × 10–3) | yes | 4.67 × 10–1 (2.37 × 10–1) |
| GGT, μkatal/L | 0.41 (0.09) | 0.45 (0.11) | 0.49 (0.11) | 0.45 (0.15) | 0.43 (0.11) | 6.84 × 10–4 (8.20 × 10–4) | yes | 6.55 × 10–1 (3.18 × 10–1) |
| Total bilirubin, μmol/L | 12.5 (8.4) | 12.6 (8.7) | 13.5 (7.3) | 11.9 (6.4) | 11.9 (7.3) | 1.56 × 10–3 (1.18 × 10–3) | yes | 5.83 × 10–1 (2.35 × 10–1) |
| Direct bilirubin, μmol/L | 2.86 (1.35) | 3.04 (1.35) | 3.28 (1.24) | 2.84 (1.03) | 3.03 (1.39) | 3.00 × 10–3 (5.14 × 10–4) | yes | 1.06 × 10–1 (6.69 × 10–2) |
| Complement C3, g/L | 1.15 (0.27) | 1.21 (0.16) | 1.17 (0.11) | 1.10 (0.14) | 1.11 (0.14) | 4.49 × 10–3 (5.06 × 10–4) | no | 2.38 × 10–2 (1.75 × 10–2)f |
| Complement C4, g/L | 0.24 (0.06) | 0.25 (0.05) | 0.24 (0.05) | 0.23 (0.05) | 0.24 (0.05) | 9.81 × 10–4 (1.38 × 10–4) | no | 3.09 × 10–2 (2.94 × 10–2)f |
a L-T4 application of levothyroxine
bMean and standard deviation (SD) of the estimate for FT4 in linear mixed regression models adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI) from 101 subsamples
cDependent variable was logarithmized to base 10
dMean and SD of the P value
eRepeated measurement analysis of variance adjusted for age and BMI
fSignificant results
FT free thyroxine, FT free triiodothyronine, TSH thyrotropin, SHBG sex hormone binding globulin, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, GGT γ-glutamyl transpeptidase
Fig. 2Means with 95% confidence intervals for serum concentrations of selected biochemical parameters during the study periods. Corresponding estimates from regression analyses are given in Table 1. bas baseline, w4(T4)/w8(T4) 4 and 8 weeks of levothyroxine treatment, w12/w16 4 and 8 weeks after stopping the application
Fig. 3Heatmap of plasma metabolites significantly associated with free thyroxine (FT4) in mixed effect linear regression models. The first column displays the values of the mean false discovery rate (FDR) for the FT4 effect across 101 subsamples coded in grey color. The other columns indicate the mean log2-ratio from baseline (bas) compared to 4 (w4(T4)) and 8 (w8(T4)) weeks of treatment as well as 4 (w12) and 8 (w16) weeks after finishing the treatment. The time course of the FT4 concentrations is shown on top of the map as reference. Orange shading denotes an increase and blue shading a decrease compared to baseline, respectively. Derived physiological signatures are labeled on the left. The corresponding estimates and FDR values from regression analysis can be found in Additional file 2: Table S1. Metabolites marked with a star were assigned based on in silico fragmentation spectra
Fig. 4Heatmap of plasma proteins significantly associated with free thyroxine (FT4) in mixed effect linear regression models. The first column displays the values of the mean false discovery rate (FDR) for the FT4 effect across 101 subsamples of the data coded in grey color. The other columns indicate the mean log2-ratio from baseline (bas) compared to 4 (w4(T4)) and 8 (w8(T4)) weeks of treatment as well as 4 (w12) and 8 (w16) weeks after finishing the treatment. The time course of FT4 concentrations is shown on the top of the map as reference. Orange shading denotes an increase and blue shading a decrease compared to baseline, respectively. Derived physiological signatures are labeled on the left. The corresponding estimates and FDR values from regression analysis can be found in Additional file 2: Table S2
Fig. 5Final results from classification analyses using random forests in a two-stage cross-validation scheme with 50 inner and 30 outer loops (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Left panel: Fifteen most important metabolites/proteins ranked by a weighted (area under the curve) mean Gini index. Right panel: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (upper) and boxplot of the area under the curve (lower) from 30 outer loops. Overlapping ROCs are displayed by darker shades and the diamond indicates the mean AUC. CADH5 cadherin-5, FHR5 complement factor H-related protein 5, F13B coagulation factor XIII B chain, LUM lumican, VASN vasorin