Literature DB >> 28062797

Targeted Proteomics for Multiplexed Verification of Markers of Colorectal Tumorigenesis.

Anuli Christiana Uzozie1, Nathalie Selevsek2, Asa Wahlander2, Paolo Nanni2, Jonas Grossmann2, Achim Weber3, Federico Buffoli4, Giancarlo Marra5.   

Abstract

Targeted proteomic methods can accelerate the verification of multiple tumor marker candidates in large series of patient samples. We utilized the targeted approach known as selected/multiple reaction monitoring (S/MRM) to verify potential protein markers of colorectal adenoma identified by our group in previous transcriptomic and quantitative shotgun proteomic studies of a large cohort of precancerous colorectal lesions. We developed SRM assays to reproducibly detect and quantify 25 (62.5%) of the 40 selected proteins in an independent series of precancerous and cancerous tissue samples (19 adenoma/normal mucosa pairs; 17 adenocarcinoma/normal mucosa pairs). Twenty-three proteins were significantly up-regulated (n = 17) or downregulated (n = 6) in adenomas and/or adenocarcinomas, as compared with normal mucosa (linear fold changes ≥ ±1.3, adjusted p value <0.05). Most changes were observed in both tumor types (up-regulation of ANP32A, ANXA3, SORD, LDHA, LCN2, NCL, S100A11, SERPINB5, CDV3, OLFM4, and REG4; downregulation of ARF6 and PGM5), and a five-protein biomarker signature distinguished neoplastic tissue from normal mucosa with a maximum area under the receiver operating curve greater than 0.83. Other changes were specific for adenomas (PPA1 and PPA2 up-regulation; KCTD12 downregulation) or adenocarcinoma (ANP32B, G6PD, RCN1, and SET up-regulation; downregulated AKR1B1, APEX1, and PPA1). Some changes significantly correlated with a few patient- or tumor-related phenotypes. Twenty-two (96%) of the 23 proteins have a potential to be released from the tumors into the bloodstream, and their detectability in plasma has been previously reported. The proteins identified in this study expand the pool of biomarker candidates that can be used to develop a standardized precolonoscopy blood test for the early detection of colorectal tumors.
© 2017 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28062797      PMCID: PMC5341002          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M116.062273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  97 in total

1.  S100A6 and S100A11 are specific targets of the calcium- and zinc-binding S100B protein in vivo.

Authors:  J C Deloulme; N Assard; G O Mbele; C Mangin; R Kuwano; J Baudier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0.

Authors:  Jannick Dyrløv Bendtsen; Henrik Nielsen; Gunnar von Heijne; Søren Brunak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  The absolute quantification strategy: a general procedure for the quantification of proteins and post-translational modifications.

Authors:  Donald S Kirkpatrick; Scott A Gerber; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer screening: prospects for molecular stool analysis.

Authors:  R Justin Davies; Richard Miller; Nicholas Coleman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Gastrointestinal tract cancer screening using fecal carcinoembryonic antigen.

Authors:  Yonggoo Kim; Seong Lee; Seungcheol Park; Haemyung Jeon; Wonbae Lee; Jae Kwang Kim; Myungok Cho; Myungshin Kim; Jihyang Lim; Chang Suk Kang; Kyungja Han
Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.256

7.  Feature-based prediction of non-classical and leaderless protein secretion.

Authors:  Jannick Dyrløv Bendtsen; Lars Juhl Jensen; Nikolaj Blom; Gunnar Von Heijne; Søren Brunak
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 1.650

8.  Fecal DNA testing compared with conventional colorectal cancer screening methods: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth Song; A Mark Fendrick; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Analysis of minichromosome maintenance proteins as a novel method for detection of colorectal cancer in stool.

Authors:  R Justin Davies; Alex Freeman; Lesley S Morris; Sheila Bingham; Stephen Dilworth; Ian Scott; Ronald A Laskey; Richard Miller; Nicholas Coleman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  S100C/A11 is a key mediator of Ca(2+)-induced growth inhibition of human epidermal keratinocytes.

Authors:  Masakiyo Sakaguchi; Masahiro Miyazaki; Mikiro Takaishi; Yoshihiko Sakaguchi; Eiichi Makino; Noriyuki Kataoka; Hidenori Yamada; Masayoshi Namba; Nam-ho Huh
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  21 in total

1.  Comprehensive analysis of the long noncoding RNA expression profile and construction of the lncRNA-mRNA co-expression network in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Qun Zhang; Zhou Ding; Li Wan; Wenyu Tong; Jialei Mao; Li Li; Jing Hu; Mi Yang; Baorui Liu; Xiaoping Qian
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.742

2.  Excavating the pathogenic gene of breast cancer based on high throughput data of tumor and somatic reprogramming.

Authors:  Lian Duan; Zhendong Wang; Xin Zheng; Junjian Li; Huamin Yin; Weibo Tang; Dejian Deng; Hui Liu; Jiayu Wei; Yan Jin; Feng Liu; Jingling Shen
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 5.173

3.  Identification of key lncRNAs in colorectal cancer progression based on associated protein-protein interaction analysis.

Authors:  Haishan Zhu; Jiajing Yu; Haifeng Zhu; Yusheng Guo; Shengjie Feng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Molecular profiling identifies prognostic markers of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Jinchen Shao; Lei Zhu; Ruiying Zhao; Jie Xing; Jun Wang; Xiaohui Guo; Shichun Tu; Baohui Han; Keke Yu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-24

5.  PGM5: a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for liver cancer.

Authors:  Yan Jiao; Yanqing Li; Peiqiang Jiang; Wei Han; Yahui Liu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Exploration of the Key Proteins in the Normal-Adenoma-Carcinoma Sequence of Colorectal Cancer Evolution Using In-Depth Quantitative Proteomics.

Authors:  Yin Zhang; Chun-Yuan Li; Wei Ge; Yi Xiao
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SETD7 is a potential serum biomarker for colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Baojun Duan; Jun Bai; Jian Qiu; Jianhua Wang; Cong Tong; Xiaofei Wang; Jiyu Miao; Zongfang Li; Wensheng Li; Juan Yang; Chen Huang
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 8.143

8.  The potential value of CDV3 in the prognosis evaluation in Hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Heng Xiao; Baoyong Zhou; Ning Jiang; Yunshi Cai; Xiongwei Liu; Zhengrong Shi; Ming Li; Chengyou Du
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2018-01-31

9.  ExSTA: External Standard Addition Method for Accurate High-Throughput Quantitation in Targeted Proteomics Experiments.

Authors:  Yassene Mohammed; Jingxi Pan; Suping Zhang; Jun Han; Christoph H Borchers
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  PGM5 is a promising biomarker and may predict the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Yifan Sun; Haihua Long; Lin Sun; Xiujuan Sun; Liping Pang; Jianlin Chen; Qingqun Yi; Tianwei Liang; Yongqi Shen
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.722

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.