Literature DB >> 12661896

Gastrointestinal tract cancer screening using fecal carcinoembryonic antigen.

Yonggoo Kim1, Seong Lee, Seungcheol Park, Haemyung Jeon, Wonbae Lee, Jae Kwang Kim, Myungok Cho, Myungshin Kim, Jihyang Lim, Chang Suk Kang, Kyungja Han.   

Abstract

There is a great need to detect gastrointestinal tract cancer at an early stage. It is well known that most carcinoma tissues of the gastrointestinal tract contain carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Stools are a rich source of cells derived from the gastrointestinal tract. We analyzed total fecal CEA in 60 gastrointestinal tract cancer patients, 20 benign gastrointestinal tract disorder patients, and 240 normal controls, using a simple, reliable method. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of fecal CEA with those of serum CEA and fecal occult blood test (FOBT). The level of fecal CEA in gastrointestinal tract cancer was much higher than controls (44.1 +/- 70.1 ng/mg stool vs 3.7 +/- 3.5 ng/mg stool, p < 0.001) and was not increased in benign gastrointestinal disorders (4.5 +/- 8.2 ng/mg stool). Fecal CEA level was > 10 ng/mg stool in 22 of 32 samples (69%)from stomach cancer patients and 24 of 28 samples (86%)from colorectal cancer patients. The sensitivity of serum CEA (> 5 ng/ml) was 19% in stomach cancer and 39% in colorectal cancer, whereas the sensitivity of FOBT was 13% in stomach cancer and 21% in colorectal cancer. The specificity of fecal CEA was 90% in benign gastrointestinal tract disorders and 93% in normal controls. This specificity was similar to those of serum CEA and FOBT. In conclusion, fecal CEA measurement is superior to serum CEA or FOBT for detection of gastrointestinal tract cancer. Fecal CEA may become the screening test of choice for gastrointestinal tract cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12661896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci        ISSN: 0091-7370            Impact factor:   1.256


  7 in total

1.  A simplified, non-invasive fecal-based DNA integrity assay and iFOBT for colorectal cancer detection.

Authors:  Murugan Kalimutho; Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco; Micaela Cretella; Elena Mannisi; Pierpaolo Sileri; Amanda Formosa; Francesco Pallone; Giorgio Federici; Sergio Bernardini
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Targeted Proteomics for Multiplexed Verification of Markers of Colorectal Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Anuli Christiana Uzozie; Nathalie Selevsek; Asa Wahlander; Paolo Nanni; Jonas Grossmann; Achim Weber; Federico Buffoli; Giancarlo Marra
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Quantitative assessment model for gastric cancer screening.

Authors:  Kun Chen; Wei-Ping Yu; Liang Song; Yi-Min Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Rectal effluent as a research tool.

Authors:  Jana M Rocker; Jack A DiPalma; Lewis K Pannell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Downregulation of serum metabolite GTA-446 as a novel potential marker for early detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Hata; Ichiro Takemasa; Hidekazu Takahashi; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Junichi Nishimura; Taishi Hata; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Fecal CEA Has an Advantage in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer at Early Stage.

Authors:  Linfang Li; Shan Xing; Miantao Wu; Yufeng Ao; Xin Zheng; Rongzeng Cai; Runkun Han; Jingcong Li; Xiaohui Li; Qiuyao Zeng
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 7.  Epigenetic Modifications as Biomarkers of Tumor Development, Therapy Response, and Recurrence across the Cancer Care Continuum.

Authors:  Margaret L Thomas; Paola Marcato
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.