Literature DB >> 19252478

piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells.

Knut Woltjen1, Iacovos P Michael, Paria Mohseni, Ridham Desai, Maria Mileikovsky, Riikka Hämäläinen, Rebecca Cowling, Wei Wang, Pentao Liu, Marina Gertsenstein, Keisuke Kaji, Hoon-Ki Sung, Andras Nagy.   

Abstract

Transgenic expression of just four defined transcription factors (c-Myc, Klf4, Oct4 and Sox2) is sufficient to reprogram somatic cells to a pluripotent state. The resulting induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells resemble embryonic stem cells in their properties and potential to differentiate into a spectrum of adult cell types. Current reprogramming strategies involve retroviral, lentiviral, adenoviral and plasmid transfection to deliver reprogramming factor transgenes. Although the latter two methods are transient and minimize the potential for insertion mutagenesis, they are currently limited by diminished reprogramming efficiencies. piggyBac (PB) transposition is host-factor independent, and has recently been demonstrated to be functional in various human and mouse cell lines. The PB transposon/transposase system requires only the inverted terminal repeats flanking a transgene and transient expression of the transposase enzyme to catalyse insertion or excision events. Here we demonstrate successful and efficient reprogramming of murine and human embryonic fibroblasts using doxycycline-inducible transcription factors delivered by PB transposition. Stable iPS cells thus generated express characteristic pluripotency markers and succeed in a series of rigorous differentiation assays. By taking advantage of the natural propensity of the PB system for seamless excision, we show that the individual PB insertions can be removed from established iPS cell lines, providing an invaluable tool for discovery. In addition, we have demonstrated the traceless removal of reprogramming factors joined with viral 2A sequences delivered by a single transposon from murine iPS lines. We anticipate that the unique properties of this virus-independent simplification of iPS cell production will accelerate this field further towards full exploration of the reprogramming process and future cell-based therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19252478      PMCID: PMC3758996          DOI: 10.1038/nature07863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  28 in total

1.  Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse.

Authors:  Matthias Stadtfeld; Nimet Maherali; David T Breault; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 24.633

2.  Transposon mutagenesis of baculoviruses: analysis of Trichoplusia ni transposon IFP2 insertions within the FP-locus of nuclear polyhedrosis viruses.

Authors:  L C Cary; M Goebel; B G Corsaro; H G Wang; E Rosen; M J Fraser
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.616

3.  Efficient transposition of the piggyBac (PB) transposon in mammalian cells and mice.

Authors:  Sheng Ding; Xiaohui Wu; Gang Li; Min Han; Yuan Zhuang; Tian Xu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Isolation of a DEAD-family protein gene that encodes a murine homolog of Drosophila vasa and its specific expression in germ cell lineage.

Authors:  Y Fujiwara; T Komiya; H Kawabata; M Sato; H Fujimoto; M Furusawa; T Noce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from fibroblast cultures.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Takahashi; Keisuke Okita; Masato Nakagawa; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  A drug-inducible transgenic system for direct reprogramming of multiple somatic cell types.

Authors:  Marius Wernig; Christopher J Lengner; Jacob Hanna; Michael A Lodato; Eveline Steine; Ruth Foreman; Judith Staerk; Styliani Markoulaki; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors.

Authors:  Keisuke Okita; Masato Nakagawa; Hong Hyenjong; Tomoko Ichisaka; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2.

Authors:  Danwei Huangfu; Kenji Osafune; René Maehr; Wenjun Guo; Astrid Eijkelenboom; Shuibing Chen; Whitney Muhlestein; Douglas A Melton
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells.

Authors:  Tobias Brambrink; Ruth Foreman; G Grant Welstead; Christopher J Lengner; Marius Wernig; Heikyung Suh; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  Conditional and inducible transgene expression in mice through the combinatorial use of Cre-mediated recombination and tetracycline induction.

Authors:  Gusztav Belteki; Jody Haigh; Nikolett Kabacs; Katharina Haigh; Karen Sison; Frank Costantini; Jeff Whitsett; Susan E Quaggin; Andras Nagy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  668 in total

Review 1.  Vascular potential of human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Ionela Iacobas; Archana Vats; Karen K Hirschi
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 2.  Generation of pluripotent stem cells without the use of genetic material.

Authors:  Akon Higuchi; Qing-Dong Ling; S Suresh Kumar; Murugan A Munusamy; Abdullah A Alarfaj; Yung Chang; Shih-Hsuan Kao; Ke-Chen Lin; Han-Chow Wang; Akihiro Umezawa
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 3.  Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches.

Authors:  Shinya Yamanaka; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Induced pluripotent stem cells--opportunities for disease modelling and drug discovery.

Authors:  Marica Grskovic; Ashkan Javaherian; Berta Strulovici; George Q Daley
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells-A New Foundation in Medicine.

Authors:  George T-J Huang
Journal:  J Exp Clin Med       Date:  2010-10-22

Review 6.  Smooth muscle and other cell sources for human blood vessel engineering.

Authors:  Sumati Sundaram; Laura E Niklason
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.481

Review 7.  Mechanism and methods to induce pluripotency.

Authors:  Peizhe Wang; Jie Na
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 14.870

8.  Recent concepts for the roles of progenitor/stem cell niche in heart repair.

Authors:  Yuliang Feng; Xi-Yong Yu; Yigang Wang
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011-12-15

9.  Non-viral iPSCs: a safe way for therapy?

Authors:  Weiqi Zhang; Di Guan; Jing Qu; Weizhou Zhang; Guang-Hui Liu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 14.870

Review 10.  Translating induced pluripotent stem cells from bench to bedside: application to retinal diseases.

Authors:  Alona O Cramer; Robert E MacLaren
Journal:  Curr Gene Ther       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.