Literature DB >> 33277321

Simplified Breast Risk Tool Integrating Questionnaire Risk Factors, Mammographic Density, and Polygenic Risk Score: Development and Validation.

Bernard Rosner1,2, Rulla M Tamimi3,4,5, Peter Kraft5,6, Chi Gao6, Yi Mu3, Christopher Scott7, Stacey J Winham7, Celine M Vachon8, Graham A Colditz9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical use of breast cancer risk prediction requires simplified models. We evaluate a simplified version of the validated Rosner-Colditz model and add percent mammographic density (MD) and polygenic risk score (PRS), to assess performance from ages 45-74. We validate using the Mayo Mammography Health Study (MMHS).
METHODS: We derived the model in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) based on: MD, 77 SNP PRS and a questionnaire score (QS; lifestyle and reproductive factors). A total of 2,799 invasive breast cancer cases were diagnosed from 1990-2000. MD (using Cumulus software) and PRS were assessed in a nested case-control study. We assess model performance using this case-control dataset and evaluate 10-year absolute breast cancer risk. The prospective MMHS validation dataset includes 21.8% of women age <50, and 434 incident cases identified over 10 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: In the NHS, MD has the highest odds ratio (OR) for 10-year risk prediction: ORper SD = 1.48 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31-1.68], followed by PRS, ORper SD = 1.37 (95% CI: 1.21-1.55) and QS, ORper SD = 1.25 (95% CI: 1.11-1.41). In MMHS, the AUC adjusted for age + MD + QS 0.650; for age + MD + QS + PRS 0.687, and the NRI was 6% in cases and 16% in controls.
CONCLUSION: A simplified assessment of QS, MD, and PRS performs consistently to discriminate those at high 10-year breast cancer risk. IMPACT: This simplified model provides accurate estimation of 10-year risk of invasive breast cancer that can be used in a clinical setting to identify women who may benefit from chemopreventive intervention.See related commentary by Tehranifar et al., p. 587. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33277321      PMCID: PMC8026588          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.090


  59 in total

1.  Breast cancer risk prediction: an update to the Rosner-Colditz breast cancer incidence model.

Authors:  Megan S Rice; Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson; Rulla M Tamimi; A Heather Eliassen; Walter C Willett; Graham Colditz; Bernard Rosner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Added Value of Serum Hormone Measurements in Risk Prediction Models for Breast Cancer for Women Not Using Exogenous Hormones: Results from the EPIC Cohort.

Authors:  Anika Hüsing; Renée T Fortner; Tilman Kühn; Kim Overvad; Anne Tjønneland; Anja Olsen; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Gianluca Severi; Agnes Fournier; Heiner Boeing; Antonia Trichopoulou; Vassiliki Benetou; Philippos Orfanos; Giovanna Masala; Valeria Pala; Rosario Tumino; Francesca Fasanelli; Salvatore Panico; H Bas Bueno de Mesquita; Petra H Peeters; Carla H van Gills; J Ramón Quirós; Antonio Agudo; Maria-Jose Sánchez; Maria-Dolores Chirlaque; Aurelio Barricarte; Pilar Amiano; Kay-Tee Khaw; Ruth C Travis; Laure Dossus; Kuanrong Li; Pietro Ferrari; Melissa A Merritt; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Elio Riboli; Rudolf Kaaks
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Comparative Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models and Projections for Future Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Parichoy Pal Choudhury; Amber N Wilcox; Mark N Brook; Yan Zhang; Thomas Ahearn; Nick Orr; Penny Coulson; Minouk J Schoemaker; Michael E Jones; Mitchell H Gail; Anthony J Swerdlow; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Montserrat Garcia-Closas
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Comparison of Questionnaire-Based Breast Cancer Prediction Models in the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Robert J Glynn; Graham A Colditz; Rulla M Tamimi; Wendy Y Chen; Susan E Hankinson; Walter W Willett; Bernard Rosner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Circulating carotenoids, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Rulla M Tamimi; Graham A Colditz; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Laura Ichikawa; William E Barlow; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Cohort Profile: The Breast Cancer Prospective Family Study Cohort (ProF-SC).

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Mary B Daly; Esther M John; Irene L Andrulis; Saundra S Buys; David E Goldgar; Julia A Knight; Alice S Whittemore; Wendy K Chung; Carmel Apicella; John L Hopper
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Long-term Accuracy of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Combining Classic Risk Factors and Breast Density.

Authors:  Adam R Brentnall; Jack Cuzick; Diana S M Buist; Erin J Aiello Bowles
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 31.777

10.  Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort.

Authors:  Adam R Brentnall; Elaine F Harkness; Susan M Astley; Louise S Donnelly; Paula Stavrinos; Sarah Sampson; Lynne Fox; Jamie C Sergeant; Michelle N Harvie; Mary Wilson; Ursula Beetles; Soujanya Gadde; Yit Lim; Anil Jain; Sara Bundred; Nicola Barr; Valerie Reece; Anthony Howell; Jack Cuzick; D Gareth R Evans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Multi-State Survival Model for Time to Breast Cancer Mortality among a Cohort of Initially Disease-Free Women.

Authors:  Bernard Rosner; Robert J Glynn; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson; Rulla M Tamimi; Wendy Y Chen; Michelle D Holmes; Yi Mu; Cheng Peng; Graham A Colditz; Walter C Willett; Shelley S Tworoger
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.090

2.  Prediction of Breast Cancer using Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Reza Rabiei; Seyed Mohammad Ayyoubzadeh; Solmaz Sohrabei; Marzieh Esmaeili; Alireza Atashi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Essentialism and Exclusion: Racism in Cancer Risk Prediction Models.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Graham A Colditz; Kia L Davis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Joanne Knight Breast Health Cohort at Siteman Cancer Center.

Authors:  Graham A Colditz; Debbie L Bennett; Jennifer Tappenden; Courtney Beers; Nicole Ackermann; Ningying Wu; Jingqin Luo; Sarah Humble; Erin Linnenbringer; Kia Davis; Shu Jiang; Adetunji T Toriola
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.506

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.