BACKGROUND AND AIM: We evaluated associations of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) metrics as an anti-reflux barrier with impedance-pH, endoscopic esophagitis, and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) metrics. METHODS: We reviewed high-resolution manometry data from consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms who underwent impedance-pH and endoscopy, and asymptomatic volunteers. The EGJ contractile integral (CI) was calculated as the mean contractile integral/second during three respiratory cycles. EGJ morphology was classified according to LES-crural diaphragm (CD) separation. RESULTS: In total, 137 patients (65 male, age 55 years) and 23 (9 male, age 33 years) controls were enrolled. Twenty-five patients had erosive reflux disease (ERD), 16 had non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 5 had reflux hypersensitivity, and 91 were not GERD. EGJ-CI were lower in patients with GERD (22.6 [13.8-29.2] mmHg cm) than non-GERD (50.3 [31-69.9] mmHg cm, P < 0.01) and controls (67 [26.7-78.7] mmHg cm). With an EGJ-CI cut-off value of 30 mmHg cm, the area under the curve was 0.814 (0.762-0.896), with 77.8% sensitivity and 81.7% specificity for the prediction of GERD. LES-CD separation was greatest in patients with ERD, followed the NERD, non-GERD, and controls. EGJ morphology type III was associated with a higher DeMeester score (7.9 [1.6-12.6]) than were type II (3.25 [0.9-5.975]) and I (1.75 [0.8-6.2]; P < 0.01). EGJ-CI values were lower in patients with GERD than in others in each EGJ morphology subgroup. CONCLUSION: Esophagogastric junction contractile integral showed good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity in predicting GERD. LES-CD separation is associated with an increase in acid reflux, but EGJ-CI was associated more strongly with GERD than was EGJ morphology.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: We evaluated associations of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) metrics as an anti-reflux barrier with impedance-pH, endoscopic esophagitis, and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) metrics. METHODS: We reviewed high-resolution manometry data from consecutive patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms who underwent impedance-pH and endoscopy, and asymptomatic volunteers. The EGJ contractile integral (CI) was calculated as the mean contractile integral/second during three respiratory cycles. EGJ morphology was classified according to LES-crural diaphragm (CD) separation. RESULTS: In total, 137 patients (65 male, age 55 years) and 23 (9 male, age 33 years) controls were enrolled. Twenty-five patients had erosive reflux disease (ERD), 16 had non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), 5 had reflux hypersensitivity, and 91 were not GERD. EGJ-CI were lower in patients with GERD (22.6 [13.8-29.2] mmHg cm) than non-GERD (50.3 [31-69.9] mmHg cm, P < 0.01) and controls (67 [26.7-78.7] mmHg cm). With an EGJ-CI cut-off value of 30 mmHg cm, the area under the curve was 0.814 (0.762-0.896), with 77.8% sensitivity and 81.7% specificity for the prediction of GERD. LES-CD separation was greatest in patients with ERD, followed the NERD, non-GERD, and controls. EGJ morphology type III was associated with a higher DeMeester score (7.9 [1.6-12.6]) than were type II (3.25 [0.9-5.975]) and I (1.75 [0.8-6.2]; P < 0.01). EGJ-CI values were lower in patients with GERD than in others in each EGJ morphology subgroup. CONCLUSION: Esophagogastric junction contractile integral showed good diagnostic accuracy with high specificity in predicting GERD. LES-CD separation is associated with an increase in acid reflux, but EGJ-CI was associated more strongly with GERD than was EGJ morphology.
Authors: Rena Yadlapati; Peter J Kahrilas; Mark R Fox; Albert J Bredenoord; C Prakash Gyawali; Sabine Roman; Arash Babaei; Ravinder K Mittal; Nathalie Rommel; Edoardo Savarino; Daniel Sifrim; André Smout; Michael F Vaezi; Frank Zerbib; Junichi Akiyama; Shobna Bhatia; Serhat Bor; Dustin A Carlson; Joan W Chen; Daniel Cisternas; Charles Cock; Enrique Coss-Adame; Nicola de Bortoli; Claudia Defilippi; Ronnie Fass; Uday C Ghoshal; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Albis Hani; Geoffrey S Hebbard; Kee Wook Jung; Philip Katz; David A Katzka; Abraham Khan; Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Adriana Lazarescu; Johannes Lengliner; Sumeet K Mittal; Taher Omari; Moo In Park; Roberto Penagini; Daniel Pohl; Joel E Richter; Jordi Serra; Rami Sweis; Jan Tack; Roger P Tatum; Radu Tutuian; Marcelo F Vela; Reuben K Wong; Justin C Wu; Yinglian Xiao; John E Pandolfino Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Peter J Kahrilas; Ravinder K Mittal; Serhat Bor; Geoffrey P Kohn; Johannes Lenglinger; Sumeet K Mittal; John E Pandolfino; Jordi Serra; Roger Tatum; Rena Yadlapati Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 3.960
Authors: Benjamin D Rogers; Arvind Rengarajan; Luiz Abrahao; Shobna Bhatia; Serhat Bor; Dustin A Carlson; Daniel Cisternas; Sutep Gonlachanvit; Albis Hani; Jamal Hayat; Osamu Kawamura; Yeung Yeh Lee; Ana Maria Leguizamo; Ans Pauwels; Julio Perez de la Serna; Rosa I Ramos; Jose Maria Remes-Troche; Sabine Roman; Edoardo Savarino; Jordi Serra; Daniel Sifrim; Salvatore Tolone; Zhiqin Wong; Frank Zerbib; John Pandolfino; C Prakash Gyawali Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 3.960
Authors: C Prakash Gyawali; Peter J Kahrilas; Edoardo Savarino; Frank Zerbib; Francois Mion; André J P M Smout; Michael Vaezi; Daniel Sifrim; Mark R Fox; Marcelo F Vela; Radu Tutuian; Jan Tack; Albert J Bredenoord; John Pandolfino; Sabine Roman Journal: Gut Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 23.059