Literature DB >> 28060703

A Dataset and Benchmarks for Segmentation and Recognition of Gestures in Robotic Surgery.

Narges Ahmidi, Lingling Tao, Shahin Sefati, Yixin Gao, Colin Lea, Benjamin Bejar Haro, Luca Zappella, Sanjeev Khudanpur, Rene Vidal, Gregory D Hager.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: State-of-the-art techniques for surgical data analysis report promising results for automated skill assessment and action recognition. The contributions of many of these techniques, however, are limited to study-specific data and validation metrics, making assessment of progress across the field extremely challenging.
METHODS: In this paper, we address two major problems for surgical data analysis: First, lack of uniform-shared datasets and benchmarks, and second, lack of consistent validation processes. We address the former by presenting the JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set (JIGSAWS), a public dataset that we have created to support comparative research benchmarking. JIGSAWS contains synchronized video and kinematic data from multiple performances of robotic surgical tasks by operators of varying skill. We address the latter by presenting a well-documented evaluation methodology and reporting results for six techniques for automated segmentation and classification of time-series data on JIGSAWS. These techniques comprise four temporal approaches for joint segmentation and classification: hidden Markov model, sparse hidden Markov model (HMM), Markov semi-Markov conditional random field, and skip-chain conditional random field; and two feature-based ones that aim to classify fixed segments: bag of spatiotemporal features and linear dynamical systems.
RESULTS: Most methods recognize gesture activities with approximately 80% overall accuracy under both leave-one-super-trial-out and leave-one-user-out cross-validation settings.
CONCLUSION: Current methods show promising results on this shared dataset, but room for significant progress remains, particularly for consistent prediction of gesture activities across different surgeons. SIGNIFICANCE: The results reported in this paper provide the first systematic and uniform evaluation of surgical activity recognition techniques on the benchmark database.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28060703      PMCID: PMC5559351          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2647680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  35 in total

1.  The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model.

Authors:  V Datta; S Mackay; M Mandalia; A Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Assessment of surgical competence.

Authors:  A Darzi; S Mackay
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

3.  Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills.

Authors:  Alvin C Goh; David W Goldfarb; James C Sander; Brian J Miles; Brian J Dunkin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic surgery: a human factors approach to investigating the operating room environment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.442

5.  Towards automatic skill evaluation: detection and segmentation of robot-assisted surgical motions.

Authors:  Henry C Lin; Izhak Shafran; David Yuh; Gregory D Hager
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2006-09

6.  Automatic detection and segmentation of robot-assisted surgical motions.

Authors:  Henry C Lin; Izhak Shafran; Todd E Murphy; Allison M Okamura; David D Yuh; Gregory D Hager
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2005

7.  HMM assessment of quality of movement trajectory in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Julian J H Leong; Marios Nicolaou; Louis Atallah; George P Mylonas; Ara W Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2006

Review 8.  Objective assessment of technical performance.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks.

Authors:  Timothy N Judkins; Dmitry Oleynikov; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills.

Authors:  J Rosen; B Hannaford; C G Richards; M N Sinanan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  22 in total

1.  Novel evaluation of surgical activity recognition models using task-based efficiency metrics.

Authors:  Aneeq Zia; Liheng Guo; Linlin Zhou; Irfan Essa; Anthony Jarc
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Accurate and interpretable evaluation of surgical skills from kinematic data using fully convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Hassan Ismail Fawaz; Germain Forestier; Jonathan Weber; Lhassane Idoumghar; Pierre-Alain Muller
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Segmenting and classifying activities in robot-assisted surgery with recurrent neural networks.

Authors:  Robert DiPietro; Narges Ahmidi; Anand Malpani; Madeleine Waldram; Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee; S Swaroop Vedula; Gregory D Hager
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Deep learning with convolutional neural network for objective skill evaluation in robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Ziheng Wang; Ann Majewicz Fey
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Automated surgical skill assessment in RMIS training.

Authors:  Aneeq Zia; Irfan Essa
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Laparoscopic training using a quantitative assessment and instructional system.

Authors:  T Yamaguchi; R Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  Objective Assessment of Surgical Technical Skill and Competency in the Operating Room.

Authors:  S Swaroop Vedula; Masaru Ishii; Gregory D Hager
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 9.590

8.  An Intelligent Augmented Reality Training Framework for Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation.

Authors:  Shang Zhao; Xiao Xiao; Qiyue Wang; Xiaoke Zhang; Wei Li; Lamia Soghier; James Hahn
Journal:  Int Symp Mix Augment Real       Date:  2020-12-14

Review 9.  Computer Vision in the Surgical Operating Room.

Authors:  François Chadebecq; Francisco Vasconcelos; Evangelos Mazomenos; Danail Stoyanov
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-10-15

10.  Analysis of executional and procedural errors in dry-lab robotic surgery experiments.

Authors:  Kay Hutchinson; Zongyu Li; Leigh A Cantrell; Noah S Schenkman; Homa Alemzadeh
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.