Juliet Haarbauer-Krupa1, Angela Ciccia, Jonathan Dodd, Deborah Ettel, Brad Kurowski, Angela Lumba-Brown, Stacy Suskauer. 1. Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Haarbauer-Krupa); Department of Psychological Sciences, Program in Communication Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Ciccia); Department of Psychology, St Louis Children's Hospital, and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri (Dr Dodd); Education Support Services, Eugene School District #4J, Oregon (Dr Ettel); Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics and Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio (Dr Kurowski); Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis Children's Hospital, Missouri (Dr Lumba-Brown); and Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Dr Suskauer).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of evidence and consensus-based description of healthcare and educational service delivery and related recommendations for children with traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Literature review and group discussion of best practices in management of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) was performed to facilitate consensus-based recommendations from the American Congress on Rehabilitation Medicine's Pediatric and Adolescent Task Force on Brain Injury. This group represented pediatric researchers in public health, medicine, psychology, rehabilitation, and education. RESULTS: Care for children with TBI in healthcare and educational systems is not well coordinated or integrated, resulting in increased risk for poor outcomes. Potential solutions include identifying at-risk children following TBI, evaluating their need for rehabilitation and transitional services, and improving utilization of educational services that support children across the lifespan. CONCLUSION: Children with TBI are at risk for long-term consequences requiring management as well as monitoring following the injury. Current systems of care have challenges and inconsistencies leading to gaps in service delivery. Further efforts to improve knowledge of the long-term TBI effects in children, child and family needs, and identify best practices in pathways of care are essential for optimal care of children following TBI.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of evidence and consensus-based description of healthcare and educational service delivery and related recommendations for children with traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Literature review and group discussion of best practices in management of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) was performed to facilitate consensus-based recommendations from the American Congress on Rehabilitation Medicine's Pediatric and Adolescent Task Force on Brain Injury. This group represented pediatric researchers in public health, medicine, psychology, rehabilitation, and education. RESULTS: Care for children with TBI in healthcare and educational systems is not well coordinated or integrated, resulting in increased risk for poor outcomes. Potential solutions include identifying at-risk children following TBI, evaluating their need for rehabilitation and transitional services, and improving utilization of educational services that support children across the lifespan. CONCLUSION:Children with TBI are at risk for long-term consequences requiring management as well as monitoring following the injury. Current systems of care have challenges and inconsistencies leading to gaps in service delivery. Further efforts to improve knowledge of the long-term TBI effects in children, child and family needs, and identify best practices in pathways of care are essential for optimal care of children following TBI.
Authors: Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Shari L Wade; Dennis Drotar; Terry Stancin; Nori Minich Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Michael W Kirkwood; Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Christopher Randolph; Michael McCrea; Vicki A Anderson Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2007-09-01 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: J E Max; S L Koele; C C Castillo; S D Lindgren; S Arndt; H Bokura; D A Robin; W L Smith; Y Sato Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: J E Max; C S Castillo; D A Robin; S D Lindgren; W L Smith; Y Sato; P J Mattheis; J A Stierwalt Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Megan Moore; Nathalia Jimenez; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; Margaret Willis; Kate Baron; Jessica Giordano; Deborah Crawley; Frederick P Rivara; Kenneth M Jaffe; Beth E Ebel Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Richard E Nelson; Junjie Ma; Yan Cheng; Linda Ewing-Cobbs; Amy Clark; Heather Keenan Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2019 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Daniel Anderson; Jeff M Gau; Laura Beck; Deanne Unruh; Gerard Gioia; Melissa McCart; Susan C Davies; Jody Slocumb; Doug Gomez; Ann E Glang Journal: Int J Educ Res Date: 2021
Authors: Paula W Tucker; Rachel Bull; Alex Hall; Tim P Moran; Shabnam Jain; Usha Sathian; Harold K Simon; Gerard A Gioia; Jonathan J Ratcliff; David W Wright Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-02-17