Literature DB >> 28058795

Transplant size mismatch in restrictive lung disease.

Asvin M Ganapathi1, Michael S Mulvihill1, Brian R Englum1, Paul J Speicher1, Brian C Gulack1, Asishana A Osho1, Babatunde A Yerokun1, Laurie R Snyder2, Duane Davis1, Matthew G Hartwig1.   

Abstract

To maximize the benefit of lung transplantation, the effect of size mismatch on survival in lung transplant recipients with restrictive lung disease (RLD) was examined. All single and bilateral RLD lung transplants from 1987 to 2011 in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Database were identified. Donor predicted total lung capacity (pTLC):Recipient pTLC ratio (pTLCr) quantified mismatch. pTLCr was segregated into five strata. A Cox proportional hazards model evaluated the association of pTLCr with mortality hazard. To identify a critical pTLCr, a Cox model using a restricted cubic spline for pTLCr was used. A total of 6656 transplants for RLD were identified. Median pTLCr for single orthotopic lung transplant (SOLT) and bilateral orthotopic lung transplant (BOLT) was 1.0 (0.69-1.47) and 0.98 (0.66-1.45). Examination of pTLCr as a categorical variable revealed that undersizing (pTLCr <0.8) for SOLT and moderate oversizing (pTLCr = 1.1-1.2) for SOLT and BOLT had a harmful survival effect [for SOLT pTLC <0.8: HR 1.711 (95% CI 1.146-2.557), P = 0.01 and for BOLT pTLC 1.1-1.2: HR 1.717 (95% CI 1.112-2.651), P = 0.02]. Spline analysis revealed significant changes in SOLT mortality by variation of pTLCr between 0.8-0.9 and 1.1-1.2. RLD patients undergoing SOLT are susceptible to detriments of an undersized lung. RLD patients undergoing BOLT have higher risk of mortality when pTLCr falls between 1.1 and 1.2.
© 2017 Steunstichting ESOT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  donor assessment; lung transplant; organ allocation; size mismatch

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28058795      PMCID: PMC5352501          DOI: 10.1111/tri.12913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Int        ISSN: 0934-0874            Impact factor:   3.782


  15 in total

1.  A scale for decision making between whole lung transplantation or lobar transplantation.

Authors:  Domenico Loizzi; Clemens Aigner; Peter Jaksch; Axel Scheed; Bruno Mora; Francesco Sollitto; Walter Klepetko
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Lung size mismatch and survival after single and bilateral lung transplantation.

Authors:  Michael Eberlein; Robert M Reed; Servet Bolukbas; Kalpaj R Parekh; George J Arnaoutakis; Jonathan B Orens; Roy G Brower; Ashish S Shah; Lawrence Hunsicker; Christian A Merlo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Chest size matching in single and double lung transplantation.

Authors:  S Miyoshi; S Demertzis; F Eckstein; J Hohlfeld; H J Schaefers
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1999-04

Review 4.  Reference values for residual volume, functional residual capacity and total lung capacity. ATS Workshop on Lung Volume Measurements. Official Statement of The European Respiratory Society.

Authors:  J Stocks; P H Quanjer
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 16.671

5.  Lung size mismatch in bilateral lung transplantation is associated with allograft function and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Eberlein; Solbert Permutt; Mayy F Chahla; Servet Bolukbas; Steven D Nathan; Oksana A Shlobin; James H Shelhamer; Robert M Reed; David B Pearse; Jonathan B Orens; Roy G Brower
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Supranormal expiratory airflow after bilateral lung transplantation is associated with improved survival.

Authors:  Michael Eberlein; Solbert Permutt; Robert H Brown; Allison Brooker; Mayy F Chahla; Servet Bolukbas; Steven D Nathan; David B Pearse; Jonathan B Orens; Roy G Brower
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  An oversized allograft is associated with improved survival after lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Michael Eberlein; Evan Diehl; Servet Bolukbas; Christian A Merlo; Robert M Reed
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Matching donor to recipient in lung transplantation: How much does size matter?

Authors:  David P Mason; Lillian H Batizy; Jeffrey Wu; Edward R Nowicki; Sudish C Murthy; Ann M McNeill; Marie M Budev; Atul C Mehta; Gösta B Pettersson; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Lung size matching for double lung transplantation based on the submammary thoracic perimeter. Accuracy and functional results. The Joint Marseille-Montreal Lung Transplant Program.

Authors:  G Massard; M Badier; C Guillot; M Reynaud; P Thomas; R Giudicelli; M Noirclerc
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Size matching in lung transplantation using predicted total lung capacity.

Authors:  J P Ouwens; T W van der Mark; W van der Bij; A Geertsma; W J de Boer; G H Koëter
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 16.671

View more
  2 in total

1.  Uncertainty analysis of chest X-ray lung height measurements and size matching for lung transplantation.

Authors:  Rodrigo Vazquez Guillamet; Maria C Vazquez Guillamet; Ashraf Rjob; Andrew Bierhals; Irene Bello; Alberto Jauregui Abularach; Laneshia Tague; Michael Wallendorf; Gary F Marklin; Chad Witt; Derek E Byers; Daniel Kreisel; Ruben Nava; Varun Puri; Ramsey Hachem; Elbert P Trulock
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.005

2.  Early Graft Dysfunction after Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Justin Rosenheck; Colleen Pietras; Edward Cantu
Journal:  Curr Pulmonol Rep       Date:  2018-10-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.