Literature DB >> 12503698

Size matching in lung transplantation using predicted total lung capacity.

J P Ouwens1, T W van der Mark, W van der Bij, A Geertsma, W J de Boer, G H Koëter.   

Abstract

Height is used in allocation of donor lungs as an indirect estimate of thoracic size. Total lung capacity (TLC), determined by both height and sex, could be a more accurate functional estimation of thoracic size. Size-matching criteria based on height versus predicted TLC was retrospectively evaluated, and, furthermore, whether a TLC mismatch was related to clinical and functional complications. The ratio of donor and recipient height, as well as the ratio of predicted TLC in donors and recipients, were calculated in 80 patients after bilateral lung transplantation. Complications evaluated included persistent atelectasis, persistent pneumothorax and increased number of days in intensive care, occurrence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and limitation of exercise capacity. Median height donor/recipient ratio was 1.01 (0.93-1.12). Median predicted TLC donor/recipient ratio was 1.01 (with a clearly broader range 0.72-1.41). Neither sex mismatch nor TLC mismatch were related to clinical or functional complications. Allocation of donor lungs based upon height alone leads to a substantial mismatch in total lung capacity caused by sex mismatch. The absence of complications suggests that a greater height donor/recipient discrepancy can be accepted for allocation than previously assumed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12503698     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.02.00294402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  7 in total

1.  Lung size mismatch in bilateral lung transplantation is associated with allograft function and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Eberlein; Solbert Permutt; Mayy F Chahla; Servet Bolukbas; Steven D Nathan; Oksana A Shlobin; James H Shelhamer; Robert M Reed; David B Pearse; Jonathan B Orens; Roy G Brower
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Transplant size mismatch in restrictive lung disease.

Authors:  Asvin M Ganapathi; Michael S Mulvihill; Brian R Englum; Paul J Speicher; Brian C Gulack; Asishana A Osho; Babatunde A Yerokun; Laurie R Snyder; Duane Davis; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.782

3.  Changes in Thoracic Cavity Volume After Bilateral Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Woo Sik Yu; Chul Hwan Park; Hyo Chae Paik; Jin Gu Lee; Seulgi You; Jaeyong Shin; Junho Jung; Seokjin Haam
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  The feasibility of CT lung volume as a surrogate marker of donor-recipient size matching in lung transplantation.

Authors:  Woo Sang Jung; Seokjin Haam; Jae Min Shin; Kyunghwa Han; Chul Hwan Park; Min Kwang Byun; Yoon Soo Chang; Hyung Jung Kim; Tae Hoon Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Donor Selection, Management, and Procurement for Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Woo Sik Yu; JeongA Son
Journal:  J Chest Surg       Date:  2022-08-05

6.  Comparison of Predicted Total Lung Capacity and Total Lung Capacity by Computed Tomography in Lung Transplantation Candidates.

Authors:  Sung Ho Hwang; Jin Gu Lee; Tae Hoon Kim; Hyo Chae Paik; Chul Hwan Park; Seokjin Haam
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Lung protective ventilation based on donor size is associated with a lower risk of severe primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

Authors:  Laneshia K Tague; Bahaa Bedair; Chad Witt; Derek E Byers; Rodrigo Vazquez-Guillamet; Hrishikesh Kulkarni; Jennifer Alexander-Brett; Ruben Nava; Varun Puri; Daniel Kreisel; Elbert P Trulock; Andrew Gelman; Ramsey R Hachem
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 13.569

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.