Literature DB >> 28057860

Contribution of canonical nonhomologous end joining to chromosomal rearrangements is enhanced by ATM kinase deficiency.

Ragini Bhargava1,2, Caree R Carson1, Gabriella Lee1, Jeremy M Stark3,2.   

Abstract

A likely mechanism of chromosomal rearrangement formation involves joining the ends from two different chromosomal double-strand breaks (DSBs). These events could potentially be mediated by either of two end-joining (EJ) repair pathways [canonical nonhomologous end joining (C-NHEJ) or alternative end joining (ALT-EJ)], which cause distinct rearrangement junction patterns. The relative role of these EJ pathways during rearrangement formation has remained controversial. Along these lines, we have tested whether the DNA damage response mediated by the Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) kinase may affect the relative influence of C-NHEJ vs. ALT-EJ on rearrangement formation. We developed a reporter in mouse cells for a 0.4-Mbp deletion rearrangement that is formed by EJ between two DSBs induced by the Cas9 endonuclease. We found that disruption of the ATM kinase causes an increase in the frequency of the rearrangement as well as a shift toward rearrangement junctions that show hallmarks of C-NHEJ. Furthermore, ATM suppresses rearrangement formation in an experimental condition, in which C-NHEJ is the predominant EJ repair event (i.e., expression of the 3' exonuclease Trex2). Finally, several C-NHEJ factors are required for the increase in rearrangement frequency caused by inhibition of the ATM kinase. We also examined ATM effectors and found that H2AX shows a similar influence as ATM, whereas the influence of ATM on this rearrangement seems independent of 53BP1. We suggest that the contribution of the C-NHEJ pathway to the formation of a 0.4-Mbp deletion rearrangement is enhanced in ATM-deficient cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALT-EJ; ATM; C-NHEJ; chromosomal rearrangement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28057860      PMCID: PMC5278456          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1612204114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

Review 1.  The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more.

Authors:  Yosef Shiloh; Yael Ziv
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  A critical role for DNA end-joining proteins in both lymphogenesis and neurogenesis.

Authors:  Y Gao; Y Sun; K M Frank; P Dikkes; Y Fujiwara; K J Seidl; J M Sekiguchi; G A Rathbun; W Swat; J Wang; R T Bronson; B A Malynn; M Bryans; C Zhu; J Chaudhuri; L Davidson; R Ferrini; T Stamato; S H Orkin; M E Greenberg; F W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Defects in XRCC4 and KU80 differentially affect the joining of distal nonhomologous ends.

Authors:  Josée Guirouilh-Barbat; Emilie Rass; Isabelle Plo; Pascale Bertrand; Bernard S Lopez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Irreversible chromosome damage accumulates rapidly in the absence of ATM kinase activity.

Authors:  Jason S White; Serah Choi; Christopher J Bakkenist
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATM orthologue suppresses break-induced chromosome translocations.

Authors:  Kihoon Lee; Yu Zhang; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  I-SceI-based assays to examine distinct repair outcomes of mammalian chromosomal double strand breaks.

Authors:  Amanda Gunn; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

7.  ATM limits incorrect end utilization during non-homologous end joining of multiple chromosome breaks.

Authors:  Nicole Bennardo; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  A human XRCC4-XLF complex bridges DNA.

Authors:  Sara N Andres; Alexandra Vergnes; Dejan Ristic; Claire Wyman; Mauro Modesti; Murray Junop
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  DNA damage response factors from diverse pathways, including DNA crosslink repair, mediate alternative end joining.

Authors:  Sean M Howard; Diana A Yanez; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Limiting the persistence of a chromosome break diminishes its mutagenic potential.

Authors:  Nicole Bennardo; Amanda Gunn; Anita Cheng; Paul Hasty; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  20 in total

1.  Predicting the mutations generated by repair of Cas9-induced double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Felicity Allen; Luca Crepaldi; Clara Alsinet; Alexander J Strong; Vitalii Kleshchevnikov; Pietro De Angeli; Petra Páleníková; Anton Khodak; Vladimir Kiselev; Michael Kosicki; Andrew R Bassett; Heather Harding; Yaron Galanty; Francisco Muñoz-Martínez; Emmanouil Metzakopian; Stephen P Jackson; Leopold Parts
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Microhomology-mediated end joining: Good, bad and ugly.

Authors:  Ja-Hwan Seol; Eun Yong Shim; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Howard H Y Chang; Nicholas R Pannunzio; Noritaka Adachi; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  Kinase-dependent structural role of DNA-PKcs during immunoglobulin class switch recombination.

Authors:  Jennifer L Crowe; Zhengping Shao; Xiaobin S Wang; Pei-Chi Wei; Wenxia Jiang; Brian J Lee; Verna M Estes; Frederick W Alt; Shan Zha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The canonical non-homologous end joining factor XLF promotes chromosomal deletion rearrangements in human cells.

Authors:  Ragini Bhargava; Felicia Wednesday Lopezcolorado; L Jillianne Tsai; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Can Designer Indels Be Tailored by Gene Editing?: Can Indels Be Customized?

Authors:  Sara G Trimidal; Ronald Benjamin; Ji Eun Bae; Mira V Han; Elizabeth Kong; Aaron Singer; Tyler S Williams; Bing Yang; Martin R Schiller
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 7.  Reconsidering pathway choice: a sequential model of mammalian DNA double-strand break pathway decisions.

Authors:  Tanya T Paull
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 5.578

8.  Repeat-mediated deletions can be induced by a chromosomal break far from a repeat, but multiple pathways suppress such rearrangements.

Authors:  Carlos Mendez-Dorantes; Ragini Bhargava; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Analysis of NHEJ-Based DNA Repair after CRISPR-Mediated DNA Cleavage.

Authors:  Beomjong Song; Soyeon Yang; Gue-Ho Hwang; Jihyeon Yu; Sangsu Bae
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The RAD52 S346X variant reduces risk of developing breast cancer in carriers of pathogenic germline BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Aaron W Adamson; Yuan Chun Ding; Carlos Mendez-Dorantes; Adam M Bailis; Jeremy M Stark; Susan L Neuhausen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 6.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.