Literature DB >> 31753920

The canonical non-homologous end joining factor XLF promotes chromosomal deletion rearrangements in human cells.

Ragini Bhargava1,2, Felicia Wednesday Lopezcolorado1, L Jillianne Tsai1,2, Jeremy M Stark3,2.   

Abstract

Clastogen exposure can result in chromosomal rearrangements, including large deletions and inversions that are associated with cancer development. To examine such rearrangements in human cells, here we developed a reporter assay based on endogenous genes on chromosome 12. Using the RNA-guided nuclease Cas9, we induced two DNA double-strand breaks, one each in the GAPDH and CD4 genes, that caused a deletion rearrangement leading to CD4 expression from the GAPDH promoter. We observed that this GAPDH-CD4 deletion rearrangement activates CD4+ cells that can be readily detected by flow cytometry. Similarly, double-strand breaks in the LPCAT3 and CD4 genes induced an LPCAT3-CD4 inversion rearrangement resulting in CD4 expression. Studying the GAPDH-CD4 deletion rearrangement in multiple cell lines, we found that the canonical non-homologous end joining (C-NHEJ) factor XLF promotes these rearrangements. Junction analysis uncovered that the relative contribution of C-NHEJ appears lower in U2OS than in HEK293 and A549 cells. Furthermore, an ATM kinase inhibitor increased C-NHEJ-mediated rearrangements only in U2OS cells. We also found that an XLF residue that is critical for an interaction with the C-NHEJ factor X-ray repair cross-complementing 4 (XRCC4), and XRCC4 itself are each important for promoting both this deletion rearrangement and end joining without insertion/deletion mutations. In summary, a reporter assay based on endogenous genes on chromosome 12 reveals that XLF-dependent C-NHEJ promotes deletion rearrangements in human cells and that cell type-specific differences in the contribution of C-NHEJ and ATM kinase inhibition influence these rearrangements.
© 2020 Bhargava et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATM kinase; CRISPR/Cas; DNA damage; DNA damage response; DNA repair; XRCC4-like factor (XLF); canonical non-homologous end joining; chromosomal rearrangement; genomic instability; reporter gene assay

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31753920      PMCID: PMC6952595          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.010421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  56 in total

1.  Unrepaired DNA breaks in p53-deficient cells lead to oncogenic gene amplification subsequent to translocations.

Authors:  Chengming Zhu; Kevin D Mills; David O Ferguson; Charles Lee; John Manis; James Fleming; Yijie Gao; Cynthia C Morton; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Alternative endings.

Authors:  James E Haber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Plugged into the Ku-DNA hub: The NHEJ network.

Authors:  Philippe Frit; Virginie Ropars; Mauro Modesti; Jean Baptiste Charbonnier; Patrick Calsou
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 4.  Microhomology-mediated end joining: Good, bad and ugly.

Authors:  Ja-Hwan Seol; Eun Yong Shim; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 5.  Non-homologous end joining often uses microhomology: implications for alternative end joining.

Authors:  Nicholas R Pannunzio; Sicong Li; Go Watanabe; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-03-07

6.  A DNA damage response screen identifies RHINO, a 9-1-1 and TopBP1 interacting protein required for ATR signaling.

Authors:  Cecilia Cotta-Ramusino; E Robert McDonald; Kristen Hurov; Mathew E Sowa; J Wade Harper; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences.

Authors:  Jeremy M Stark; Andrew J Pierce; Jin Oh; Albert Pastink; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Chromosomal translocations in human cells are generated by canonical nonhomologous end-joining.

Authors:  Hind Ghezraoui; Marion Piganeau; Benjamin Renouf; Jean-Baptiste Renaud; Annahita Sallmyr; Brian Ruis; Sehyun Oh; Alan E Tomkinson; Eric A Hendrickson; Carine Giovannangeli; Maria Jasin; Erika Brunet
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  DNA damage response factors from diverse pathways, including DNA crosslink repair, mediate alternative end joining.

Authors:  Sean M Howard; Diana A Yanez; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair.

Authors:  Nicole Bennardo; Anita Cheng; Nick Huang; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 6.020

View more
  6 in total

1.  The importance of DNAPKcs for blunt DNA end joining is magnified when XLF is weakened.

Authors:  Metztli Cisneros-Aguirre; Felicia Wednesday Lopezcolorado; Linda Jillianne Tsai; Ragini Bhargava; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Microarray screening reveals two non-conventional SUMO-binding modules linked to DNA repair by non-homologous end-joining.

Authors:  Maria Jose Cabello-Lobato; Matthew Jenner; Metztli Cisneros-Aguirre; Kira Brüninghoff; Zac Sandy; Isabelle C da Costa; Thomas A Jowitt; Christian M Loch; Stephen P Jackson; Qian Wu; Henning D Mootz; Jeremy M Stark; Matthew J Cliff; Christine K Schmidt
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 19.160

Review 3.  Beta HPV Deregulates Double-Strand Break Repair.

Authors:  Changkun Hu; Nicholas Wallace
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 5.818

4.  Beta human papillomavirus 8 E6 allows colocalization of non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination repair factors.

Authors:  Changkun Hu; Taylor Bugbee; Dalton Dacus; Rachel Palinski; Nicholas Wallace
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 6.823

5.  Frequency and mechanisms of LINE-1 retrotransposon insertions at CRISPR/Cas9 sites.

Authors:  Jianli Tao; Qi Wang; Carlos Mendez-Dorantes; Kathleen H Burns; Roberto Chiarle
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Epidemiology of Δ8THC-Related Carcinogenesis in USA: A Panel Regression and Causal Inferential Study.

Authors:  Albert Stuart Reece; Gary Kenneth Hulse
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.