| Literature DB >> 28056826 |
Rashmirani Senapati1, Bhagyalaxmi Nayak2, Shantanu Kumar Kar3, Bhagirathi Dwibedi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Considering the limited cross protection offered by the current HPV vaccines, understanding the HPV genotype distribution among the different population is essential in predicting the efficacy of current vaccine and devising new vaccine strategy. The present work aimed at investigating the HPV genotypes distribution among women with and without cervical carcinoma in Odisha, Eastern India.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Eastern India; HPV genotype distribution; Impact of HPV vaccine; Odisha
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28056826 PMCID: PMC5216564 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-2136-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Enrollment of cases and outcomes
Sociodemographic and personal characteristics of the population(n = 595) as risk factors for HPV infection (n = 595)
| Factors | HPV + ve | HPV –ve | OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age > 45 | 236 | 133 | 1.4 (1.06-2.08) | .02 |
| Age ≤ 45 | 123 | 103 | ||
| Parity >3 | 136 | 58 | 1.87 (1.29-2.69) | .0008 |
| Parity ≤ 3 | 223 | 178 | ||
| Contraceptive Yes | 335 | 222 | 0.88 (.44-1.73) | .71 |
| No | 24 | 14 | ||
| Age of marriage ≤ 18 | 153 | 81 | 1.42 (1.01- 1.99) | .043 |
| Age of marriage > 18 | 206 | 155 | ||
| Tobacco/betel Yes | 179 | 110 | 1.13 (0.81- 1.58) | .43 |
| No | 180 | 126 | ||
| Education No | 304 | 193 | 1.18 (0.76- 1.83) | 0.4567 |
| Yes | 56 | 42 | ||
| Low socioeconomic condition | 245 | 114 | 1.62 (1.13- 2.31) | 0.0081 |
| High socioeconomic condition | 114 | 86 | ||
| Rural | 322 | 39 | 20.97 (12.65-34.76) | <0.0001 |
| Urban | 37 | 94 | ||
| Poor Menstrual hygiene | 306 | 186 | 1.55 (1.01-2..37) | 0.0437 |
| Good Menstrual hygiene | 53 | 50 | ||
| Post menopause | 170 | 97 | 1.85 (1.33 to 2.57) | 0.0002 |
| Pre menopause | 165 | 175 |
Fig. 2Age wise prevalence of HPV infection in women without cancer (inflammatory and normal cytology)
Fig. 3Trends of Multiple infections among different age group in normal and cervical cancer
Impact of 2v, 4v and 9v vaccine based on the ICC cases infected with vaccine targeted genotype
| Lowest estimation | Highest estimation | (LE + HE/2)% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cases infected with genotypes targeted by 2v vaccine(HPV16/18) | 152 (82.16%) | 181 (97.83%) | 89.99% |
| Cases infected with genotypes targeted by 4v vaccine(HPV16/18/6/11) | 152 (82.6%) | 183 (98.91%) | 91.65% |
| Cases infected with genotypes targeted by 9v vaccine(HPV16/18/6/11/31/33/45/52/58) | 156 (84.32%) | 185 (100%) | 92.16% |
| Absolute additional impact of 4v vaccine (compared with 2v vaccine) | - | 1.08% | 1.08% |
| Relative additional impact of 4v vaccine (compared with 2v vaccine) | - | 1.09% | 1.09% |
| Absolute additional impact of 9v vaccine(compared with 2v vaccine) | 2.1% | 2.16% | 2.16% |
| Relative additional impact of 9v (compared with 2v vaccine) | 2.4% | 2.16% | 2.28% |
| Absolute additional impact of 9v vaccine (compared with 4v vaccine) | 2.1% | 2.16% | 2.16% |
| Relative additional impact of 9v vaccine (compared with 4v vaccine) | 1.08% | 1.09% | 1.085% |
LE Low estimate, HE High estimate
Fig. 4Potential Impact of different HPV vaccines to prevent cervical cancer in Odisha