Melanie Brasch1, Rindia M Putri1, Mark V de Ruiter1, Daniel Luque2,3, Melissa S T Koay1, José R Castón2, Jeroen J L M Cornelissen1. 1. Department of Biomolecular Nanotechnology, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente , 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Structure of Macromolecules, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología/CSIC , Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. 3. Centro Nacional de Microbiología/Instituto de Salud Carlos III , Majadahonda, 28220 Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
The packaging of proteins into discrete compartments is an essential feature for cellular efficiency. Inspired by Nature, we harness virus-like assemblies as artificial nanocompartments for enzyme-catalyzed cascade reactions. Using the negative charges of nucleic acid tags, we develop a versatile strategy to promote an efficient noncovalent co-encapsulation of enzymes within a single protein cage of cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV) at neutral pH. The encapsulation results in stable 21-22 nm sized CCMV-like particles, which is characteristic of an icosahedral T = 1 symmetry. Cryo-EM reconstruction was used to demonstrate the structure of T = 1 assemblies templated by biological soft materials as well as the extra-swelling capacity of these T = 1 capsids. Furthermore, the specific sequence of the DNA tag is capable of operating as a secondary biocatalyst as well as bridging two enzymes for co-encapsulation in a single capsid while maintaining their enzymatic activity. Using CCMV-like particles to mimic nanocompartments can provide valuable insight on the role of biological compartments in enhancing metabolic efficiency.
The packaging of proteins into discrete compartments is an essential feature for cellular efficiency. Inspired by Nature, we harness virus-like assemblies as artificial nanocompartments for enzyme-catalyzed cascade reactions. Using the negative charges of nucleic acid tags, we develop a versatile strategy to promote an efficient noncovalent co-encapsulation of enzymes within a single protein cage of cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV) at neutral pH. The encapsulation results in stable 21-22 nm sized CCMV-like particles, which is characteristic of an icosahedral T = 1 symmetry. Cryo-EM reconstruction was used to demonstrate the structure of T = 1 assemblies templated by biological soft materials as well as the extra-swelling capacity of these T = 1 capsids. Furthermore, the specific sequence of the DNA tag is capable of operating as a secondary biocatalyst as well as bridging two enzymes for co-encapsulation in a single capsid while maintaining their enzymatic activity. Using CCMV-like particles to mimic nanocompartments can provide valuable insight on the role of biological compartments in enhancing metabolic efficiency.
In recent years, there
is increasing evidence to suggest that prokaryotes
adopt primitive organelle-like structures called bacterial microcompartments
or nanocompartments, depending on their size. Such assemblies localize
and compartmentalize multiple enzymes and substrates involved in specific
metabolic pathways.[1] The ability to mimic
and understand enzymatic activity in confinement would provide ground-breaking
insight into these assemblies and in organelles in general.[2]One of the main challenges is to controllably
package and coencapsulate
different enzymes noncovalently within the same compartment as exemplified
by Nature. There has been some success using coiled-coil helices,[3] peptide tags,[4] and
protein–protein fusion constructs[5] to direct enzymatic cargo encapsulation into protein cages. However,
such approaches often lead to covalently connected protein cargo or
inefficient loading (i.e., formation of empty cage assemblies). To
circumvent these problems, we seek a versatile approach that would
promote a noncovalent co-encapsulation of enzymes within a single
protein cage in vitro.The cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV)
is an ideal candidate
to mimic bacterial nanocompartments, owing to its size and biocompatibility.
The CCMV capsid is 28 nm in diameter and is based on a T = 3 lattice (T, triangulation number), with 12
pentamers and 20 hexamers of identical monomers of capsid protein
(CP) organized as 90 dimers.[6] Similar to
bacterial compartments,[1c] it has multiple
pores in the capsid shell (around 2 nm),[7] which allows molecules and substrates to diffuse in and out. The
CP N-terminal region is enriched in positively charged residues, termed
the arginine-rich motif (ARM), that face the capsid inner surface.
After removal of native single-strand (ss) RNA cargo, the ARM can
trigger reassembly of capsid protein dimers in the presence of an
appropriate negatively charged template, resulting in the formation
of monodisperse virus-like particles (VLP).[3,8] Encapsulation
of enzymes in VLPs has been shown to stabilize and protect the enzymes,
and its ease of modification enables new applications.[2d]In this contribution, single- and complementary-stranded
DNA tags
are chemically attached to the exterior of chosen enzymes, resulting
in negatively charged complexes that induce the co-encapsulation inside
CCMV capsids. Unlike covalent interactions, electrostatic interactions
between the DNA tags and the interior of the capsid provide a tunable
system, enabled, for instance, by changing the salt concentration
or by varying the length of the DNA chains. Hence, this makes our
system a model for natural bacterial compartments (e.g., the encapsulins)
where the confined enzymes are not covalently bound but rather included
in the protein cage by noncovalent, multivalent interactions.[2e] Noncovalent encapsulation mediated by nucleic
acid tags has been reported with the use of genetic engineering[9] and/or only focused on a single enzyme.[10] Using this strategy, we were able to confine
two separate cascade systems in vitro, for which the glucose oxidase
(GOx), a 160 kDa dimeric enzyme, is chosen as the primary enzyme for
both encapsulated cascades.[11] GOx catalyzes
the oxidation of glucose into gluconolactone (which undergoes spontaneous
hydrolysis into gluconic acid)[12] and produces
hydrogen peroxide as the side product.[11]In the first cascade system, hydrogen peroxide produced by
GOx
is consumed by the so-called DNAzyme, a peroxidase-mimic formed in
situ by a specific sequence of ssDNA in the presence of hemin (Figure A).[13] In the second cascade system, in the presence of ATP and
NADP+, gluconic acid produced by GOx is consumed by a secondary
enzyme, gluconokinase (GCK) that is coencapsulated inside the CCMV-like
particles, followed by a nonencapsulated tertiary enzyme, 6-phosphogluconate
dehydrogenase (6-PGDH), to form ribulose-5-phosphate and NADPH,[14] the latter of which can be monitored spectroscopically
(Figure B). Therefore,
the nucleic acid tags in this work are useful both as a secondary
biocatalyst (in cascade system I) and as negatively charged tags to
trigger the encapsulation of the enzyme(s) (in cascade systems I and
II).
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the enzyme pathways (encapsulated processes
shown in gray boxes). (A) Cascade reaction by GOx–DNAzyme.
GOx oxidizes glucose to gluconic acid and produces H2O2, which DNAzyme uses for subsequent reaction with ABTS inside
CCMV capsid. (B) Cascade reaction performed by co-encapsulated GOx
and GCK. The conversion of glucose to d-gluconate-6-P occurs
at the interior of the CCMV capsids, whereas the conversion of d-gluconate-6-P into ribulose-5-P occurs at the exterior of
the CCMV capsid catalyzed by tertiary enzyme, 6-PGDH.
Schematic representation of the enzyme pathways (encapsulated processes
shown in gray boxes). (A) Cascade reaction by GOx–DNAzyme.
GOx oxidizes glucose to gluconic acid and produces H2O2, which DNAzyme uses for subsequent reaction with ABTS inside
CCMV capsid. (B) Cascade reaction performed by co-encapsulated GOx
and GCK. The conversion of glucose to d-gluconate-6-P occurs
at the interior of the CCMV capsids, whereas the conversion of d-gluconate-6-P into ribulose-5-P occurs at the exterior of
the CCMV capsid catalyzed by tertiary enzyme, 6-PGDH.
Results and Discussion
Encapsulation of Enzymes
Promoted by DNA Anchor
We
anticipated that functionalization and subsequent hybridization of
GOx and GCK with (complementary) single-stranded DNA strands should
promote their co-encapsulation into CCMV capsids (Figure ). We suspect that the size
of the enzyme cargo as well as the number and spatial distribution
of negative charges anchored to the enzyme surface might play a role
in determining the efficiency of the encapsulation. To modify and
hybridize the relevant enzymes, the lysine residues of GOx and GCK
were functionalized with a heterobifunctional linker using sulfo-NHS
coupling followed by maleimide–thiol chemistry on the single
stranded DNA (ssDNA) or its complementary sequence (csDNA), respectively
(see Figures S1 and S2). All hybridized
complexes were purified initially by spin-filtration to remove excess
DNA. Furthermore, size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) was used for
the GOx–GCK dual-enzyme complex to remove nonhybridized GCK
and GOx prior to encapsulation (Figure S3).
Figure 2
Encapsulation of different enzyme–DNA hybrids inside CCMV
capsids (gray) at pH 7.5. Encapsulation of (A) ssDNA in yellow, (B)
GOx, in blue, functionalized with ssDNA, (C) GCK, in green, functionalized
with the complementary ssDNA in red, (D) GOx conjugated to GCK. The
specific sequence of ssDNA is catalytically active in the presence
of hemin.
Encapsulation of different enzyme–DNA hybrids inside CCMV
capsids (gray) at pH 7.5. Encapsulation of (A) ssDNA in yellow, (B)
GOx, in blue, functionalized with ssDNA, (C) GCK, in green, functionalized
with the complementary ssDNA in red, (D) GOx conjugated to GCK. The
specific sequence of ssDNA is catalytically active in the presence
of hemin.Encapsulation of GOx–ssDNA,
GCK–csDNA, or hybridized
GOx–GCK in CCMV at pH 7.5 led to the formation of stable capsid-like
assemblies, which were purified by SEC (Figure A–D). The elution volume (12 mL),
together with the relative absorbance ratio (260 nm/280 nm) > 1,
are
characteristic features of intact CCMV capsids containing DNA-based
cargo. Control experiments with no DNA tags (i.e., nonfunctionalized
GOx and/or GCK) confirmed that enzymes lacking ssDNA or csDNA cannot
be encapsulated (Figure S4). As anticipated,
the DNA strands provide the required negative charges for reassembly
into virus-like particles. This further ensures that no empty particles
are obtained with this strategy and that formed particles always contain
a negatively charged cargo.
Figure 3
Purification and characterization of enzyme-filled
CCMV capsids.
Size-exclusion chromatograms for CCMV containing (A) ssDNA, (B) GOx–ssDNA,
(C) GCK–csDNA, and (D) GOx–GCK, with monitoring at λ
= 260 (red), 280 (blue), and 450 nm (black), for DNA, CCMV, and flavin
(GOx), respectively. The schematic cartoons above each peak represent
the corresponding particles. Negatively stained transmission electron
microscopy of (E) ssDNA, (F) GOx–ssDNA, (G) GCK–csDNA,
and (H) GOx–GCK encapsulated CCMV assemblies.
Purification and characterization of enzyme-filled
CCMV capsids.
Size-exclusion chromatograms for CCMV containing (A) ssDNA, (B) GOx–ssDNA,
(C) GCK–csDNA, and (D) GOx–GCK, with monitoring at λ
= 260 (red), 280 (blue), and 450 nm (black), for DNA, CCMV, and flavin
(GOx), respectively. The schematic cartoons above each peak represent
the corresponding particles. Negatively stained transmission electron
microscopy of (E) ssDNA, (F) GOx–ssDNA, (G) GCK–csDNA,
and (H) GOx–GCK encapsulated CCMV assemblies.The assembled CCMV-like particles were characterized
by negative
staining transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure E–H)[15] and dynamic light scattering (DLS, Figure S5), showing spherical structures of around 20 nm in
diameter. The size of around 20 nm indicates the formation of T = 1 icosahedral symmetry that is composed of 60 identical
capsid subunits.[16] Furthermore, co-encapsulation
of GOx and GCK in a single particle was confirmed with SDS-PAGE and
Western blot analyses (Figures S6 and S7). Additionally, their concentrations and relative ratios were estimated
by gel densitometry, which suggested a GOx/GCK/capsid protein ratio
of approximately 1:1.4:60. Since the capsid protein is composed of
60 identical subunits, we estimate that only a single GOx–ssDNA
is confined inside CCMV-like particles for cascade system I and a
hybrid of 1 GOx–DNA and 1 or 2 GCK–csDNA is confined
for cascade system II.
Cryo-EM Reconstruction of Enzyme-Filled Particles
To
confirm the assembly of CCMV-like particles with T = 1 icosahedral symmetry, we analyzed the GOx–ssDNA-loaded
CCMV-like particles with cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to calculate
their native three-dimensional reconstruction (3DR) (Figure A). The sample contained particles
with spherical and elongated profiles as well as irregular assemblies
(Figure A, inset).
Two-dimensional classification followed by a three-dimensional classification
using Relion software resulted in two sizes of icosahedral capsids
with T = 1 architecture.[16c] Whereas class I capsids were 214 Å in diameter (Figure B), class II capsids were 226
Å (Figure C).
Figure 4
Three-dimensional
cryo-EM reconstructions of GOx–ssDNA-loaded
CCMV capsids. (A) Cryo-electron micrograph of GOx–ssDNA-loaded
CCMV capsids. Black arrows indicate elongated particles, and red arrowheads
indicate irregular particles. Two-dimensional class averages derived
from the final 15481 particle data set (inset). Bar, 50 nm. (B) Surface-shaded
representation of the outer surface of the class I T = 1 capsid (diameter 21.4 nm) viewed along a 2-, 3-, and 5-fold
axis of icosahedral symmetry (top to bottom). Models of the class
I T = 1 capsid, with the front half of the cargo
and protein shell removed (right). Protein shell is white, cargo is
yellow. Arrow indicates a 2-fold axis of icosahedral symmetry. (C)
Surface-shaded representations of the outer surface of the class II T = 1 capsid (diameter 22.6 nm) (as in B).
Three-dimensional
cryo-EM reconstructions of GOx–ssDNA-loaded
CCMV capsids. (A) Cryo-electron micrograph of GOx–ssDNA-loaded
CCMV capsids. Black arrows indicate elongated particles, and red arrowheads
indicate irregular particles. Two-dimensional class averages derived
from the final 15481 particle data set (inset). Bar, 50 nm. (B) Surface-shaded
representation of the outer surface of the class I T = 1 capsid (diameter 21.4 nm) viewed along a 2-, 3-, and 5-fold
axis of icosahedral symmetry (top to bottom). Models of the class
I T = 1 capsid, with the front half of the cargo
and protein shell removed (right). Protein shell is white, cargo is
yellow. Arrow indicates a 2-fold axis of icosahedral symmetry. (C)
Surface-shaded representations of the outer surface of the class II T = 1 capsid (diameter 22.6 nm) (as in B).Capsids I and II made up 50% of the total particles
in the sample
(70% class I, 30% class II). Both capsids were built of 12 pentamers,
with different compacting levels. The cryo-EM images analyzed for
processing are in fact snapshots of the dynamic states of the sample;
the ratio observed could be due to displacement of dynamic equilibrium
toward class I T = 1 capsids (70% class I, 30% class
II). The two particle sizes might be related to the reported dynamic
swelling of the T = 3 CCMV native capsid, as the
size difference of 5% involves a ∼7 Å outward radial expansion
and widening of the pores, hinting at possible structural breathing.
In both T = 1 capsids, the pentamer bases were strongly
connected to the underlying GOx–ssDNA cargo, although the capsid
surface pores were distinct. Whereas class I capsid pentamers barely
left any space between their lateral contacts, those of class II capsids
were clearly separated and left large pores, especially at the icosahedral
2-fold axes (Figure B, C, arrows).Docking of CCMV capsid protein (CP) dimer into
the cryo-EM density
maps of GOx-ssDNA-loaded T = 1 VLP showed major structural differences
of the two classes (Figure A,B). Connecting densities between pentamers and cargo were
mediated by residues 42–50 of the CP N-terminal region (Figure C, dark blue), although
the preceding region (residues 27–41) could also be involved
(Figure C, pink).
The CP C-terminal ends were responsible for CP dimer assembly in class
I CCMV T = 1 capsids (Figure A, arrows; Figure D, red). The hinge angle formed between CP
dimers in GOx–ssDNA-loaded T = 1 class I capsids
was ∼60° (Figure D); it resembles that found at the quasi-2-fold axes of the
swollen T = 3 CCMV capsid[17] and in other CP dimers such as the phthalocyanine-loaded T = 1 VLP.[18] CCMV CP dimers are
the building blocks of native T = 3 virion capsids
as well as of in vitro assembled structures such as tubes[19] and icosahedral capsids with T = 1 (containing 30 CP dimers), T = 2 (60 dimers),
and T = 3 (90 dimers) architecture.[20] The outward expansion of the class II capsid pentamer entailed
the disappearance of or a great reduction in dimeric contacts (Figure B, arrows) and indicated
that these interactions contribute much less to class II capsid stability
than to that of class I capsids. Assuming the same building block
is involved, the class II capsids are based on pentamers bound weakly
by the CP C-terminal ends (Figure E, red), which adhere strongly to the polyanionic cargo.
Figure 5
Pseudoatomic
model of GOx–ssDNA-loaded CCMV capsids. (A) T = 1 class I capsid viewed down a 3-fold axis from outside,
with docked CCMV CP atomic coordinates. A pentamer is depicted in
dark blue. Arrows indicate three dimeric contacts. (B) Class II T = 1 capsid viewed down a 3-fold axis from outside (as
in B). (C) Pentamer contacts with the cargo mediated by residues 42–50
in the N-terminal region (dark blue, bottom view). The N-terminal
region residues 27–41 might also contribute to cargo–pentamer
contacts (pink). (D, E) CP dimers in class I (D) and class II T = 1 capsids (E). Side view (top), top view (bottom). The
hinge dihedral angle is indicated. CP monomers in the class II dimer
are 6.5 Å further apart than class I dimers (N-terminal 27–32
region is omitted).
Pseudoatomic
model of GOx–ssDNA-loaded CCMV capsids. (A) T = 1 class I capsid viewed down a 3-fold axis from outside,
with docked CCMV CP atomic coordinates. A pentamer is depicted in
dark blue. Arrows indicate three dimeric contacts. (B) Class II T = 1 capsid viewed down a 3-fold axis from outside (as
in B). (C) Pentamer contacts with the cargo mediated by residues 42–50
in the N-terminal region (dark blue, bottom view). The N-terminal
region residues 27–41 might also contribute to cargo–pentamer
contacts (pink). (D, E) CP dimers in class I (D) and class II T = 1 capsids (E). Side view (top), top view (bottom). The
hinge dihedral angle is indicated. CP monomers in the class II dimer
are 6.5 Å further apart than class I dimers (N-terminal 27–32
region is omitted).After imposing icosahedral
symmetry in class I and II capsids,
we observed the packed cargo as a hollow sphere (9.6 × 105 and 1.2 × 106 Å3, respectively),
with numerous connections to the T = 1 capsid inner
surface. A significant difference in cargo packing between these two
classes is therefore unlikely. Based on the atomic model of GOx (PDB 1GAL), several copies
of GOx could be encapsulated in the capsid, although our biochemical
analyses indicated the presence of a GOx dimer only. This discrepancy
is probably due to the chemical modification of accessible Lys residues
of GOx that are covalently bound to ssDNA. The cargo–capsid
connections observed in the 3D cryo-EM maps probably represent the
interaction of the ARM region with negatively charged DNA strands.
GOx–ssDNA packaging resulted in a slightly disordered icosahedral
capsid (also reflected in a limited map resolution), but this cargo
enabled structural polymorphism with weak CP interactions in the dimer.
Both T = 1 capsids coexist in dynamic equilibrium,
probably enabled because the CP–ssDNA interactions are more
flexible (or less well-defined) than the CP–ssRNA interactions.
To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of the formation
of a T = 1 CCMV-like structure templated by a biological
soft material that also displays an extreme capsid swelling.
Confined
Catalysis by Enzymatic Pathways
Following
structural characterization of enzyme–DNA complexes inside T = 1 CCMV-like particles, we proceeded to monitor the enzymatic
activity of both cascade systems to examine whether the encapsulated
complexes were still catalytically active. For cascade system I (Figure A and Figure A), we deliberately chose the
ssDNA sequence coupled to the GOx to be that of a hemin-binding DNA
quadruplex, the so-called DNAzyme. In the presence of hemin, the ssDNA
spontaneously forms a scaffold that mimics the catalytic properties
of horseradish peroxidase (HRP).[13] The
catalytic activity of GOx–DNAzyme was monitored via the production
of ABTS+• at λ = 410 nm upon addition of glucose
to the system.[21] The activity plot obtained
for encapsulated GOx–DNAzyme shows that both GOx and DNAzyme
remained catalytically active after encapsulation (Figure B and Figure S8A). Furthermore, both systems displayed catalytic activity
profiles that seem to follow Michaelis–Menten kinetics.[22] An increase in both Km values (2.2-fold) and kcat values (1.7-fold)
is observed when the system is encapsulated (summarized in Table S1).
Figure 6
Enzymatic activity in CCMV confinement.
(A) Schematic representation
of cascade system I in the presence of a competing enzyme, catalase
(encapsulated processes shown in gray boxes). (B) Kinetic measurements
of cascade system I; the production of ABTS•+ was
monitored at λ = 410 nm at different glucose concentrations.
(C) Kinetic measurements of cascade system II; the production of NADPH
was monitored at λ = 340 nm at different glucose concentrations.
(D) Kinetic measurements for the production of ABTS+· in the presence of and after pH inactivation of the competing enzyme,
catalase.
Enzymatic activity in CCMV confinement.
(A) Schematic representation
of cascade system I in the presence of a competing enzyme, catalase
(encapsulated processes shown in gray boxes). (B) Kinetic measurements
of cascade system I; the production of ABTS•+ was
monitored at λ = 410 nm at different glucose concentrations.
(C) Kinetic measurements of cascade system II; the production of NADPH
was monitored at λ = 340 nm at different glucose concentrations.
(D) Kinetic measurements for the production of ABTS+· in the presence of and after pH inactivation of the competing enzyme,
catalase.For cascade system II consisting
of GOx, GCK, and 6-PGDH (Figure B), we monitored
the formation of the end product, NADPH at λ = 340 nm, upon
addition of glucose to the system.[14] Both
enzymes (GOx and GCK) are therefore required for the reaction and
its visualization at 340 nm. The activity profile in Figure C and Figure S8B confirms that both enzymes were present in the system and
still active upon hybridization and subsequent encapsulation. Comparable
to system I, the catalytic profiles of both systems also follow Michaelis–Menten
kinetics. While the Km values remain similar
for both systems, the kcat values show
a 2-fold increase for the encapsulated system (summarized in Table S1).Based on the recurring trends,
a slightly higher turnover number
(kcat) upon pathway encapsulation is estimated,
although the protein concentration determination by gel densitometry
is expected to have a large deviation and consequently also the kcat. An eventual increase might be the result
of a local enhancement in effective molarity due to confinement[23] or of the channeling effect when multiple enzymes
in a cascade pathway are brought to a close proximity inside a confined
system.[5a]The enzymatic activities
observed for both cascade pathways indicated
that the substrate glucose was able to diffuse into the capsid shell.
We further investigated whether the intermediate of the cascade could
also diffuse freely or was trapped inside the cagelike structure during
the reaction. In order to confirm the state of the intermediate, we
added a catalase enzyme to the bulk solution of encapsulated GOx–DNAzyme
(Figure A). In a competitive
pathway, H2O2 is broken down to water and oxygen
by the enzyme catalase, and it can therefore act as an external competitor
with the DNAzyme.[24] In contrast, if the
H2O2 intermediate is trapped inside CCMV (as
proposed for the bacterial microcompartments),[25] the kinetics of ABTS•+ production should
remain unaltered. Instead, we observed almost complete suppression
of ABTS•+ production in the presence of catalase
(Figure D). Only upon
lowering the buffer to pH 4 and hence inactivating catalase (t = 60 min) could the H2O2 conversion
by DNAzyme be restored while maintaining the stability of the particles,
as confirmed by SEC and TEM analyses in Figure S9. This strongly suggested that H2O2 can diffuse out of the CCMV capsid. Taken together, in agreement
with a previous report,[26] we also observed
that the CCMV capsid shell is permeable to small molecules such as
H2O2, which can diffuse out of the capsid shell
and react with the competing enzyme. Nevertheless, it should be noted
that the DNAzyme is likely to exhibit lower catalytic efficiency and
lower affinity to H2O2 compared to catalase,[27] which could also lead to the diffusion of H2O2 out of the CCMV capsid.
Conclusions
We have presented a highly effective strategy of using single-stranded
DNA for the controlled noncovalent packing of enzyme cascades in a
single protein capsid assembly. To demonstrate the versatility of
this strategy, two different cascade systems based on glucose oxidase
were assembled inside the protein shell of CCMV at pH 7.5 and were
both shown to be catalytically active. This encapsulation strategy
resulted in icosahedral structures of approximately 20 nm, which were
further analyzed with 3D cryo-EM. The resulting 3D reconstruction
provides the first-time demonstration of T = 1 structured
assemblies of CCMV around a biological soft matter template. In addition,
an extra-swelling phenomenon was indicated on the basis of the coexistence
of two differently sized particles of similar structure and origin.
The method presented for assembling virus-like particles can provide
a structural and functional basis to analyze bacterial protein organelles
and will further improve our understanding of their containment properties
and biochemical function.
Experimental Section
Materials
Chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
unless stated otherwise. The ssDNA (5′-HS-(CH2)6-GGGTAGGGCGGGTTGGGTTTT-3′)
and csDNA (5′-HS-(CH2)6-AAAACCCAACCCGCCCTACCC-3′)
oligonucleotide sequences were synthesized by Eurofins MWG Operon.
For the coupling of DNA to enzymes, the bifunctional cross-linker
sulfo-EMCS (N-[ε-maleimidocaproyloxy] sulfosuccinimide
ester) was purchased from Pierce. d-Gluconate/d-glucono-δ-lactone
assay kit was purchased from Megazyme and used as provided. All other
reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich or Fluka unless stated
otherwise and were used without further purification. A stock solution
of hemin (5 mM) was prepared in DMSO and stored in the dark at 4 °C.
Glucose was dissolved in 50 mM Tris–HCl, 100 mM KCl buffer
at pH 7.5. All reactions were carried out at room temperature unless
stated otherwise.
Encapsulation of ssDNA, GOx–ssDNA,
csDNA–GCK,
and GOx–GCK in CCMV Virus-like Particles
CCMV was
dialyzed against assembly buffer (250 mM Tris–HCl, 500 mM NaCl,
50 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.5) to obtain CCMV dimer coat
proteins (CCMV-CP) (500 μM). ssDNA, GOx–ssDNA, csDNA–GCK,
and GOx–GCK were buffer exchanged against Milli-Q water using
Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters (30 kDa or 10 kDa MWCO). For the
encapsulation, ssDNA, GOx–ssDNA, csDNA–GCK, and GOx–GCK
and CCMV–CP (in assembly buffer) were mixed in a 4:1 (v/v)
ratio and incubated for 2 h at 4 °C before purification by size-exclusion
chromatography (SEC) using a Superose 6 10/100 GL column, eluting
with 50 mM Tris–HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5
mM DTT at pH 7.5. Protein fractions were collected and analyzed by
SDS–PAGE, agarose gel, and Western blot analysis. For the complete
procedure, see theSI.
Transmission
Electron Microscopy Analysis
Samples (5
μL) were applied onto Formvar–carbon-coated grids. After
1 min, the excess liquid was drained. Uranyl acetate (5 μL,
1% w/v) was added and the excess liquid was drained after 20 s and
dried for 30 min at room temperature. The samples were examined on
a FEG-TEM (Phillips CM 30) operated at 300 kV acceleration voltages.
Cryo-electron Microscopy and Image Processing
GOx–ssDNA-loaded
VLP (5 μL) were applied to one side of Quantifoil R 2/2 holey
grids, blotted, and plunged into liquid ethane in a Leica EM CPC cryofixation
unit. The grids were analyzed in a Tecnai G2 electron microscope equipped
with a field emission gun operating at 200 kV, and images were recorded
under low-dose conditions with a FEI Eagle CCD at a detector magnification
of 69,444X (2.16 Å/pixel sampling rate). Image processing operations
were performed using Xmipp[28] and Relion,[29] and graphic representations were produced with
UCSF Chimera.[30] The Xmipp automatic picking
routine was used to select 15481 particles, and defocus was determined
with CTFfind.[31] Images were 2D-classified
using the appropriate Relion routine and 7932 isometric particles
were selected. The structure of phthalocyanine-loaded CCMV T = 1 capsid[18] was filtered out to 30 Å, and the cargo
density was masked. This map was used as an initial model for 3D classification
of spherical particles, using Relion to select 5572 (class I) and
2318 (class II) particles; these data sets were used to obtain the
final 3DRs using the Relion autorefinement routine. Resolution was
assessed by gold standard FSC between two independently processed
half-data sets. Applying a correlation limit of 0.5 (0.3), the resolution
for class I and II 3D maps was 22.7 (22.2) and 25.6 (21.3) Å,
respectively. The Chimera fitting tool was used to dock the atomic
structure of a whole pentamer from the X-ray structure of CCMV[17a] (PDB entry 1CWP) into the cryoEM maps.
Kinetic Measurements
of GOx–GCK: NADPH Assay
Substrate solutions containing
various glucose concentrations (0–1
M, 180 μL) were prepared. An enzyme solution containing either
(1) free GOx–GCK (60 μL) or (2) encapsulated GOx–GCK
(60 μL) was used in these studies. 6-PGDH (55 U/mL, 2 μL)
and 16.1 mM NADP+ containing 69.4 mM ATP were added to each reaction
mixture at pH 7.5, according to the manufacturer’s instructions
(Megazyme kit). The reaction was started upon addition of glucose
(120 μL) to enzyme (82 μL), and formation of reduced NADPH
was monitored at λ = 340 nm in 100 s time intervals over 2 h
at 27 °C.
Kinetic Measurements of GOx–DNAzyme:
ABTS Assay
Stock solutions containing both substrates glucose
(ranging from
0–1 M) and 4 mM ABTS were freshly prepared at room temperature.
Individual solutions containing either (1) free GOx–DNAzyme
(30 μL) and hemin (30 μL, 5 μM) or (2) encapsulated
GOx–DNAzyme (30 μL) and hemin (30 μL, 5 μM)
were prepared and incubated at rt for 2 h. To each enzyme containing
solution (60 μL) was added the substrate solution containing
both glucose and ABTS (120 μL), and the reaction was monitored
immediately at λ = 410 nm for the conversion of ABTS to ABTS•+ at 27 °C in 100 s time intervals over 2 h. Control
experiments containing hemin, glucose, and ABTS were performed under
the same reaction conditions.
Data Analysis
Experimental data were corrected for
background absorbance (using the control experiment as a reference).
The concentration of ABTS•+ or NADPH was determined
using the Lambert–Beer law, assuming extinction coefficients
of ABTS•+ (ε410 nm = 36000
M–1 cm–1) or NADPH (ε340 nm = 6300 M–1 cm–1) before plotting concentration (μM) vs time (min) curves,
from which the velocity (v) was determined (μM/min). A dilution
factor (DF) relative to the enzyme (GOx) and a proportionality factor
of ABTS to substrate consumption (p = 1/2) were used
to correct the velocity values as described in eq .
Authors: Friso D Sikkema; Marta Comellas-Aragonès; Remco G Fokkink; Benedictus J M Verduin; Jeroen J L M Cornelissen; Roeland J M Nolte Journal: Org Biomol Chem Date: 2006-11-17 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Marta Comellas-Aragonès; Hans Engelkamp; Victor I Claessen; Nico A J M Sommerdijk; Alan E Rowan; Peter C M Christianen; Jan C Maan; Benedictus J M Verduin; Jeroen J L M Cornelissen; Roeland J M Nolte Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2007-09-23 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: L Lavelle; M Gingery; M Phillips; W M Gelbart; C M Knobler; R D Cadena-Nava; J R Vega-Acosta; L A Pinedo-Torres; J Ruiz-Garcia Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2009-03-26 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Sourabh Shukla; He Hu; Hui Cai; Soo-Khim Chan; Christine E Boone; Veronique Beiss; Paul L Chariou; Nicole F Steinmetz Journal: Annu Rev Virol Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 10.431
Authors: Lise Schoonen; Selma Eising; Mark B van Eldijk; Jaleesa Bresseleers; Margo van der Pijl; Roeland J M Nolte; Kimberly M Bonger; Jan C M van Hest Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 4.774