Literature DB >> 2805468

Long-term results of various treatment options for infected total knee arthroplasty.

B F Morrey1, F Westholm, S Schoifet, J A Rand, R S Bryan.   

Abstract

Of 73 infected total knee arthroplasties treated from 1973 through 1984, the outcome of various management options revealed that solid arthrodesis was obtained in 70%. Fifteen percent of those with a solid fusion had residual pain or even recurrence of infection. Aggressive debridement was successful in eight of ten (80%). Long-term follow-up results show reimplantations were successful in eight of 15 (53%) but were functionally successful in only five of 15 (33%). A treatment plan based on functional considerations follows. For acute infections a very aggressive initial debridement followed by primary closure over an antibiotic-soaked pack is carried out. The prosthesis is left in place if at all possible and if the bone-cement interface has not demonstrated loosening. The knee is debrided every two or three days until negative cultures are obtained. Antibiotic beads are then inserted, with reexploration at three weeks with new cultures. Parenteral antibiotics are given for a three-week period initially. If two successive surgical debridements fail to reveal a positive culture, the knee is closed and rehabilitation is begun. For chronic infections, the recommendations of Wilde and Ruth are followed, employing antibiotic-impregnated beads and spacers with staged debridements similar to the method described above. Finally, an accurate definition of the true value of any of these options is predicated on long-term follow-up studies, since options that seemed promising as an initial procedure have proved disappointing as more experienced and longer follow-up study is obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2805468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

1.  [Logistic requirements and biopsy of periprosthetic infections: what should be taken into consideration?].

Authors:  B Fink; P Schäfer; L Frommelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty after methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Dann J Laudermilch; Catherine J Fedorka; Alma Heyl; Nalini Rao; Richard L McGough
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Salvage of the infected arthroplasty.

Authors:  A C Ross
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  [Diagnostic strategies in cases of suspected periprosthetic infection of the knee. A review of the literature and current recommendations].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; P Diehl; L Gerdesmeyer; W Mittelmeier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  [Treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. When does implant salvage make sense?].

Authors:  T Kern; H Gollwitzer; M Militz; V Bühren
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Assessing the gold standard: a review of 253 two-stage revisions for infected TKA.

Authors:  Tahir Mahmud; Matthew C Lyons; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J Macdonald; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  [Revision of tumour endoprostheses around the knee joint. Review and own results].

Authors:  R Windhager; A Leithner; M Hochegger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Irrigation and débridement and prosthesis retention for treating acute periprosthetic infections.

Authors:  Jonathan P Van Kleunen; Denise Knox; Jonathan P Garino; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Treatment based on the type of infected TKA improves infection control.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Yoowang Choi; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Tibial tubercle osteotomy or quadriceps snip in two-stage revision for prosthetic knee infection? A randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Bharat Sharma; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.