Literature DB >> 20309658

Outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty after methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Dann J Laudermilch1, Catherine J Fedorka, Alma Heyl, Nalini Rao, Richard L McGough.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming a more frequent concern, as increased morbidity following TKA has been reported for infections by resistant organisms. This study investigates whether MRSA infections are associated with decreased functional scores. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore compared the functional scores, operative times, and rates of reinfection of revision TKA following MRSA infection versus other indications for revision.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts of 101 patients (103 knees) who underwent mobile bearing TKA revision from January 2003 to September 2006, with a minimum clinical followup of 2 years in 45 knees (44%). We obtained the following indices: WOMAC, Activities of Daily Living Score (ADLS), SF-36, and Knee Society scores (KSS). Three groups of revisions were compared: MRSA infection (n = 6), non-MRSA infection (n = 9), and aseptic failure (n = 30). The three groups were similar in demographics and comorbidities.
RESULTS: The MRSA (166 minutes) and non-MRSA groups (149 minutes) had longer operative times than the aseptic group (121 minutes). With numbers available, there were no differences in ROM, WOMAC, ADLS, KSS, and SF-36, with MRSA separate or combined with all infections. Infection recurrence between MRSA-infected knees and non-MRSA-infected knees was similar.
CONCLUSIONS: While our study was underpowered to detect functional differences between MRSA-infected knees and non-MRSA-infected knees it does add data to the literature. Knees revised for infection have longer operative times and more frequent infection after revision. The reason for increased operative times is unclear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20309658      PMCID: PMC2895853          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1304-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  34 in total

Review 1.  Infection and musculoskeletal conditions: Prosthetic-joint-associated infections.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.098

2.  Results of direct exchange or debridement of the infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mauricio Silva; Ravi Tharani; Thomas P Schmalzried
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Results of periprosthetic hip and knee infections caused by resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Douglas J Kilgus; David J Howe; Andrew Strang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Patient satisfaction and outcome after septic versus aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack; G Engh; C Rorabeck; J Sawhney; M Woolfrey
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection.

Authors:  John J Engemann; Yehuda Carmeli; Sara E Cosgrove; Vance G Fowler; Melissa Z Bronstein; Sharon L Trivette; Jane P Briggs; Daniel J Sexton; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  The often poor clinical outcome of infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ching-Jen Wang; Ting-Wen Huang; Jun-Wen Wang; Han-Shiang Chen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Prophylactic cefazolin versus placebo in total hip replacement. Report of a multicentre double-blind randomised trial.

Authors:  C Hill; R Flamant; F Mazas; J Evrard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-04-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Total joint arthroplasty in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients: an alarming rate of early failure.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Thomas A Sullivan; Mark W Pagnano; Robert T Trousdale; Mark E Bolander
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Limited success with open debridement and retention of components in the treatment of acute Staphylococcus aureus infections after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carl Deirmengian; Jordan Greenbaum; Paul A Lotke; Robert E Booth; Jess H Lonner
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J N Insall; F M Thompson; B D Brause
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  8 in total

1.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Addition of Vancomycin to Cefazolin Prophylaxis Is Associated With Acute Kidney Injury After Primary Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Daniel Wongworawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Emerging technologies for long-term antimicrobial device coatings: advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Erika L Cyphert; Horst A von Recum
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-01-01

3.  Affinity interactions drive post-implantation drug filling, even in the presence of bacterial biofilm.

Authors:  Erika L Cyphert; Sean T Zuckerman; Julius N Korley; Horst A von Recum
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Prosthetic knee infection by resistant bacteria: the worst-case scenario.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Ivan De Martino; Giorgio Gasparini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Prophylaxis with nasal decolonization in patients submitted to total knee and hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David Sadigursky; Henrique Santos Pires; Saulo Américo Caldas Rios; Francisco Luiz Borja Rodrigues Filho; Gustavo Castro de Queiroz; Mateus Lemos Azi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-10-27

6.  Periprosthetic Joint Infection Does Not Preclude Good Outcomes after a Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 144 Retrospective Cases.

Authors:  Du Hyun Ro; Jong-Keun Kim; Sunghwan Kim; Hyuk-Soo Han; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Active remote-site musculoskeletal infection as a risk factor for periprosthetic infection in a new joint implant: A case series.

Authors:  Bassem I Haddad; Jihad Alajlouni; Mohammad Hamdan; Ala' Hawa; Elsiddig E Mahmoud
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-11

Review 8.  Low-grade periprosthetic knee infection: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.