Literature DB >> 25563864

Early Drain Removal--The Middle Ground Between the Drain Versus No Drain Debate in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Validation Study.

Zhi Ven Fong1, Camilo Correa-Gallego, Cristina R Ferrone, Gregory R Veillette, Andrew L Warshaw, Keith D Lillemoe, Carlos Fernández-del Castillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To perform an unbiased assessment of first postoperative day (POD 1) drain amylase level and pancreatic fistula (PF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
BACKGROUND: Recent evidence demonstrated that drain abandonment in PD is unsafe. Early drain amylase levels have been proposed as predictors of PF after PD, allowing for selection of patients for early drain removal.
METHODS: Daily drain amylase levels were correlated with the development of PF in 2 independent cohorts of patients undergoing PD: training cohort (n = 126; year 2008) and validation cohort (n = 369; years 2009-2012).
RESULTS: POD 1 drain amylase level had the highest predictive ability (concordance index: 0.911) for PF in the training cohort. An amylase level of 612 U/L or higher showed the best accuracy (86%), sensitivity (93%), and specificity (79%). Thus, a cutoff value of 600 U/L was utilized. In the validation cohort, 229 (62.1%) patients had a POD 1 drain amylase level of lower than 600 U/L, and PF developed in only 2 (0.9%) cases; whereas in patients with POD 1 drain amylase level of 600 U/L or higher (n = 140) the PF rate was 31.4% (odds ratio [OR] = 52, P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, POD 1 drain amylase level of lower than 600 U/L (OR = 0.0192, P < 0.0001) was a stronger predictor of the absence of PF than pancreatic gland texture (OR = 0.193, P = 0.002) and duct diameter (OR = 0.861, P = 0.835).
CONCLUSIONS: After PD, the risk of PF is less than 1% if POD 1 drain amylase level is lower than 600 U/L. We propose that in this group, which comprise more than 60% of patients, drains should be removed on POD 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25563864     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  23 in total

1.  Evolving the Paradigm of Early Drain Removal Following Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Thomas F Seykora; Laura Maggino; Giuseppe Malleo; Major K Lee; Robert Roses; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Adherence to ERAS elements in major visceral surgery-an observational pilot study.

Authors:  Steffen Wolk; Marius Distler; Benjamin Müssle; Susanne Söthje; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Intra-operative amylase in peri-pancreatic fluid independently predicts for pancreatic fistula post pancreaticoduodectomy.

Authors:  Philip R de Reuver; Justin Gundara; Thomas J Hugh; Jaswinder S Samra; Anubhav Mittal
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Outcomes Improvement Is Not Continuous Along the Learning Curve for Pancreaticoduodenectomy at the Hospital Level.

Authors:  Taylor M Coe; Zhi Ven Fong; Samuel E Wilson; Mark A Talamini; Keith D Lillemoe; David C Chang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Intra-Operative Amylase Concentration in Peri-Pancreatic Fluid Predicts Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Christopher B Nahm; Philip R de Reuver; Thomas J Hugh; Andrew Pearson; Anthony J Gill; Jaswinder S Samra; Anubhav Mittal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Amylase in drain fluid for the diagnosis of pancreatic leak in post-pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Tsetsegdemberel Bat-Ulzii Davidson; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-07

Review 7.  [Evidence-based supportive measures to secure pancreatic anastomoses].

Authors:  O Belyaev; W Uhl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  What are the predictors that can help identify safe removal of drains following pancreatectomy?

Authors:  Emanuel Eguia; Ann E Hwalek; Brendan Martin; Gerard Abood; Gerard V Aranha
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Predictive nomogram for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jian Shen; Feng Guo; Yan Sun; Jingyuan Zhao; Jin Hu; Zunxiang Ke; Yushun Zhang; Xin Jin; Heshui Wu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Oliver Strobel; John Neoptolemos; Dirk Jäger; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.